Dataset Information

Is age more than manual material handling associated with lumbar vertebral body and disc changes? A cross-sectional multicentre MRI study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Conflicting evidence exists to what extent manual material handling (MMH) causes lumbar disc disease, lack of evidence exist that this effect takes place especially at L5-S1 level, where the greatest moment occurs. The aim was to assess if lumbar vertebral body and disc changes are more common in people whose job involves significant MMH and, if so, to evaluate if lumbar vertebral body and disc changes are more prevalent in the lower part of the lumbar spine (L4-L5 and L5-S1).

Design

Observational, cross-sectional, with quasi-random recruitment.

Setting

Outpatient radiology units of three large hospitals in northern (Bologna and Brescia) and southern (Bari) Italy.

Participants

183 consecutive adult subjects (89 males, 94 females) aged 20-70 years referred by the general practitioner or a specialist for MRI of the lumbar spine.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Neuroradiologists (blind to clinical assessment) evaluated the prevalence of intervertebral disc and vertebral body changes in standardised MRI examinations. History of personal and family musculoskeletal diseases and injuries, current and previous MMH at work and during leisure time were assessed by interview and self-administered questionnaire.

Results

Participants were classified according their occupational exposure to MMH. No association was found between MMH and vertebral body and intervertebral disc changes, whereas age over 45 years was consistently associated with more disc extension beyond the interspace changes, Pfirrmann changes, osteophytes and Modic changes: the association was statistically significant at the conventional 5% level.

Conclusions

Age, and not MMH, seems to primarily affect the presence of intervertebral disc changes; prospective studies are needed to better explore the relationship between MMH and the possible presence (and level) of lumbar vertebral body and/or disc changes.

SUBMITTER: Violante FS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6756319 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is age more than manual material handling associated with lumbar vertebral body and disc changes? A cross-sectional multicentre MRI study.

Violante Francesco S FS Zompatori Maurizio M Lovreglio Piero P Apostoli Pietro P Marinelli Francesco F Bonfiglioli Roberta R

BMJ open 20190918 9

<h4>Objective</h4>Conflicting evidence exists to what extent manual material handling (MMH) causes lumbar disc disease, lack of evidence exist that this effect takes place especially at L5-S1 level, where the greatest moment occurs. The aim was to assess if lumbar vertebral body and disc changes are more common in people whose job involves significant MMH and, if so, to evaluate if lumbar vertebral body and disc changes are more prevalent in the lower part of the lumbar spine (L4-L5 and L5-S1).< ...[more]

PMID: 31537567

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLumbar spine disorders are one of the common causes of low back pain (LBP). Objective and reliable measurement of anatomical parameters of the lumbar spine is essential in the clinical diagnosis and evaluation of lumbar disorders. However, manual measurements are time-consuming and laborious, with poor consistency and repeatability. Here, we aim to develop and evaluate an automatic measurement model for measuring the anatomical parameters of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc based on lateral lumbar radiographs and deep learning (DL).MethodsA model based on DL was developed with a dataset consisting of 1,318 lateral lumbar radiographs for the prediction of anatomical parameters, including vertebral body heights (VBH), intervertebral disc heights (IDH), and intervertebral disc angles (IDA). The mean of the values obtained by 3 radiologists was used as a reference standard. Statistical analysis was performed in terms of standard deviation (SD), mean absolute error (MAE), Percentage of correct keypoints (PCK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), regression analysis, and Bland-Altman plot to evaluate the performance of the model compared with the reference standard.ResultsThe percentage of intra-observer landmark distance within the 3 mm threshold was 96%. The percentage of inter-observer landmark distance within the 3 mm threshold was 94% (R1 and R2), 92% (R1 and R3), and 93% (R2 and R3), respectively. The PCK of the model within the 3 mm distance threshold was 94-99%. The model-predicted values were 30.22±3.01 mm, 10.40±3.91 mm, and 10.63°±4.74° for VBH, IDH, and IDA, respectively. There were good correlation and consistency in anatomical parameters of the lumbar vertebral body and disc between the model and the reference standard in most cases (R2=0.89-0.95, ICC =0.93-0.98, MAE =0.61-1.15, and SD =0.89-1.64).ConclusionsThe newly proposed model based on a DL algorithm can accurately measure various anatomical parameters on lateral lumbar radiographs. This could provide an accurate and efficient measurement tool for the quantitative evaluation of spinal disorders.

Project description:Adverse clinical outcomes for total disc arthroplasty (TDA), including subsidence, heterotopic ossification, and adjacent-level vertebral fracture, suggest problems with the underlying biomechanics. To gain insight, we investigated the role of size and stiffness of TDA implants on load-transfer within a vertebral body. Uniquely, we accounted for the realistic multi-scale geometric features of the trabecular micro-architecture and cortical shell. Using voxel-based finite element analysis derived from a micro-computed tomography scan of one human L1 vertebral body (74-μm-sized elements), a series of generic elliptically shaped implants were analyzed. We parametrically modeled three implant sizes (small, medium [a typical clinical size], and large) and three implant materials (metallic, E = 100 GPa; polymeric, E = 1 GPa; and tissue-engineered, E = 0.01 GPa). Analyses were run for two load cases: 800 N in uniform compression and flexion-induced anterior impingement. Results were compared to those of an intact model without an implant and loaded instead via a disc-like material. We found that TDA implantation increased stress in the bone tissue by over 50% in large portions of the vertebra. These changes depended more on implant size than material, and there was an interaction between implant size and loading condition. For the small implant, flexion increased the 98th-percentile of stress by 32 ± 24% relative to compression, but the overall stress distribution and trabecular-cortical load-sharing were relatively insensitive to loading mode. In contrast, for the medium and large implants, flexion increased the 98th-percentile of stress by 42 ± 9% and 87 ± 29%, respectively, and substantially re-distributed stress within the vertebra; in particular overloading the anterior trabecular centrum and cortex. We conclude that TDA implants can substantially alter stress deep within the lumbar vertebra, depending primarily on implant size. For implants of typical clinical size, bending-induced impingement can substantially increase stress in local regions and may therefore be one factor driving subsidence in vivo.

Project description:(1) Background: Low back disorders are a leading cause of missed work and physical disability in manual material handling due to repetitive lumbar loading and overexertion. Ergonomic assessments are often performed to understand and mitigate the risk of musculoskeletal overexertion injuries. Wearable sensor solutions for monitoring low back loading have the potential to improve the quality, quantity, and efficiency of ergonomic assessments and to expand opportunities for the personalized, continuous monitoring of overexertion injury risk. However, existing wearable solutions using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) are limited in how accurately they can estimate back loading when objects of varying mass are handled, and alternative solutions in the scientific literature require so many distributed sensors that they are impractical for widespread workplace implementation. We therefore explored new ways to accurately monitor low back loading using a small number of wearable sensors. (2) Methods: We synchronously collected data from laboratory instrumentation and wearable sensors to analyze 10 individuals each performing about 400 different material handling tasks. We explored dozens of candidate solutions that used IMUs on various body locations and/or pressure insoles. (3) Results: We found that the two key sensors for accurately monitoring low back loading are a trunk IMU and pressure insoles. Using signals from these two sensors together with a Gradient Boosted Decision Tree algorithm has the potential to provide a practical (relatively few sensors), accurate (up to r2 = 0.89), and automated way (using wearables) to monitor time series lumbar moments across a broad range of material handling tasks. The trunk IMU could be replaced by thigh IMUs, or a pelvis IMU, without sacrificing much accuracy, but there was no practical substitute for the pressure insoles. The key to realizing accurate lumbar load estimates with this approach in the real world will be optimizing force estimates from pressure insoles. (4) Conclusions: Here, we present a promising wearable solution for the practical, automated, and accurate monitoring of low back loading during manual material handling.

Dataset Information

Is age more than manual material handling associated with lumbar vertebral body and disc changes? A cross-sectional multicentre MRI study.

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Is age more than manual material handling associated with lumbar vertebral body and disc changes? A cross-sectional multicentre MRI study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets