Dataset Information

Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The optimal analgesic technique after pancreatoduodenectomy remains under debate. This study aimed to see whether epidural analgesia (EA) has superior clinical outcomes compared with non-epidural alternatives (N-EA) in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. On 28 August 2018, relevant literature databases were searched. Primary outcomes were pain scores. Secondary outcomes were treatment failure of initial analgesia, complications, duration of hospital stay and mortality.

Results

Three RCTs and eight cohort studies (25 089 patients) were included. N-EA treatments studied were: intravenous morphine, continuous wound infiltration, bilateral paravertebral thoracic catheters and intrathecal morphine. Patients receiving EA had a marginally lower pain score on days 0-3 after surgery than those receiving intravenous morphine (mean difference (MD) -0·50, 95 per cent c.i. -0·80 to -0·21; P?P?P?P?=?0·02) compared with intravenous morphine.

Conclusion

EA provides marginally lower pain scores in the first postoperative days than intravenous morphine, and appears to be associated with fewer complications, shorter duration of hospital stay and less mortality.

SUBMITTER: Groen JV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6773638 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Groen J V JV Khawar A A J AAJ Bauer P A PA Bonsing B A BA Martini C H CH Mungroop T H TH Vahrmeijer A L AL Vuijk J J Dahan A A Mieog J S D JSD

BJS open 20190429 5

<h4>Background</h4>The optimal analgesic technique after pancreatoduodenectomy remains under debate. This study aimed to see whether epidural analgesia (EA) has superior clinical outcomes compared with non-epidural alternatives (N-EA) in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. On 28 August 2018, relevant literature databases were searched. Primary outcomes were pain scores. Secondary outcomes w ...[more]

PMID: 31592509

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceMorbidity is still high in pancreatic surgery, driven mainly by gastrointestinal complications such as pancreatic fistula. Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (EDA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) are frequently used for pain control after pancreatic surgery. Evidence from a post hoc analysis suggests that PCIA is associated with fewer gastrointestinal complications.ObjectiveTo determine whether postoperative PCIA decreases the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications after pancreatic surgery compared with EDA.Design, setting, and participantsIn this adaptive, pragmatic, international, multicenter, superiority randomized clinical trial conducted from June 30, 2015, to October 1, 2017, 371 patients at 9 European pancreatic surgery centers who were scheduled for elective pancreatoduodenectomy were randomized to receive PCIA (n = 185) or EDA (n = 186); 248 patients (124 in each group) were analyzed. Data were analyzed from February 22 to April 25, 2019, using modified intention to treat and per protocol.InterventionsPatients in the PCIA group received general anesthesia and postoperative PCIA with intravenous opioids with the help of a patient-controlled analgesia device. In the EDA group, patients received general anesthesia and intraoperative and postoperative EDA.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was a composite of pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal bleeding, or postoperative ileus within 30 days after surgery. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, other complications, postoperative pain levels, intraoperative or postoperative use of vasopressor therapy, and fluid substitution.ResultsAmong the 248 patients analyzed (147 men; mean [SD] age, 64.9 [10.7] years), the primary composite end point did not differ between the PCIA group (61 [49.2%]) and EDA group (57 [46.0%]) (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.71-1.95 P = .54). Neither individual components of the primary end point nor 30-day mortality, postoperative pain levels, or intraoperative and postoperative substitution of fluids differed significantly between groups. Patients receiving EDA gained more weight by postoperative day 4 than patients receiving PCIA (mean [SD], 4.6 [3.8] vs 3.4 [3.6] kg; P = .03) and received more vasopressors (46 [37.1%] vs 31 [25.0%]; P = .04). Failure of EDA occurred in 23 patients (18.5%).Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that the choice between PCIA and EDA for pain control after pancreatic surgery should not be based on concerns regarding gastrointestinal complications because the 2 procedures are comparable with regard to effectiveness and safety. However, EDA was associated with several shortcomings.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00007784.

Project description:AimWomen during the postpartum period are at risk for psychiatric disorders such as postpartum depression (PPD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anxiety. It is controversial whether labour epidural analgesia have a protective role on PPD, PTSD, and anxiety or not. This study is a meta-analysis of previously published observational studies to investigate the association between epidural analgesia and PPD, PTSD, and anxiety.MethodsWe searched Cochran Library, PubMed, ProQuest, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception until December 2022. The outcome measures were positive screen of PPD, PTSD, and anxiety among women who received labour epidural analgesia. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the observational studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. The mean differences or odds ratios were pooled based on random effect.ResultsWe included 31 studies (12,064 women) in the review. The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported mean (standard deviation) showed no significant association between epidural analgesia and PPD (Mean Difference = 0.01; 95% Confidence Interval = -0.14 to 0.16; p-value = 0.88). The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported percentage showed no statistically significant difference in terms of the chance of depression between the exposed and non-exposed groups (Log Odds Ratio = -0.61; 95% CI = -1.48 to 0.26; p-value = 0.17). The meta-analysis of PPD studies reported OR showed indicate a lower chance of depression in the epidural group compared to the non-epidural group (Effect size = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.38; P-value = 0.00). In the case of PTSD, due to the heterogeneity of the tools and the methodology of the studies, it was impossible to reach a definitive conclusion and measure the studies in a meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of anxiety studies showed that no significant association between epidural analgesia and anxiety (MD = -1.36; 95% CI = -3.38 to 1.14; p-value = 0.29).ConclusionBased on the meta-analysis of observational studies, epidural analgesia for labour pain relief has no protective effect on postpartum psychiatric disorders.

Dataset Information

Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets