Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The use of epidural analgesia (EA) in pancreatic surgery remains under debate. This study compares patients treated with EA versus non-EA after open pancreatectomy in a tertiary referral center.Methods
All patients undergoing open pancreatectomy from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. (Non-)EA was terminated on postoperative day (POD) 3 or earlier if required.Results
In total, 190 (72.5%) patients received EA and 72 (27.5%) patients received non-EA (mostly intravenous morphine). EA was terminated prematurely in 32.6% of patients and non-EA in 10.5% of patients. Compared with non-EA patients, EA patients had significantly lower pain scores on POD 0 (1.10 (0-3.00) versus 3.00 (1.67-5.00), P?ConclusionsIn our cohort, patients with EA experienced significantly lower pain scores in the first PODs compared with non-EA, yet higher pain scores after EA had been terminated. Although EA patients required more vasoactive medication and fluid therapy, the complication rate was similar.
SUBMITTER: Groen JV
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6877489 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Groen Jesse V JV Slotboom David E F DEF Vuyk Jaap J Martini Chris H CH Dahan Albert A Vahrmeijer Alexander L AL Bonsing Bert A BA Mieog J Sven D JSD
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 20190226 12
<h4>Background</h4>The use of epidural analgesia (EA) in pancreatic surgery remains under debate. This study compares patients treated with EA versus non-EA after open pancreatectomy in a tertiary referral center.<h4>Methods</h4>All patients undergoing open pancreatectomy from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. (Non-)EA was terminated on postoperative day (POD) 3 or earlier if required.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 190 (72.5%) patients received EA and 72 (27.5%) patients received non-EA (mo ...[more]