Dataset Information

Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.

ABSTRACT: Genotypes are often used to assign parentage in agricultural and ecological settings. Sequencing can be used to obtain genotypes but does not provide unambiguous genotype calls, especially when sequencing depth is low in order to reduce costs. In that case, standard parentage analysis methods no longer apply. A strategy for using low-depth sequencing data for parentage assignment is developed here. It entails the use of relatedness estimates along with a metric termed excess mismatch rate which, for parent-offspring pairs or trios, is the difference between the observed mismatch rate and the rate expected under a model of inheritance and allele reads without error. When more than one putative parent has similar statistics, bootstrapping can provide a measure of the relatedness similarity. Putative parent-offspring trios can be further checked for consistency by comparing the offspring's estimated inbreeding to half the parent relatedness. Suitable thresholds are required for each metric. These methods were applied to a deer breeding operation consisting of two herds of different breeds. Relatedness estimates were more in line with expectation when the herds were analyzed separately than when combined, although this did not alter which parents were the best matches with each offspring. Parentage results were largely consistent with those based on a microsatellite parentage panel with three discordant parent assignments out of 1561. Two models are investigated to allow the parentage metrics to be calculated with non-random selection of alleles. The tools and strategies given here allow parentage to be assigned from low-depth sequencing data.

SUBMITTER: Dodds KG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6778805 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.

Dodds Ken G KG McEwan John C JC Brauning Rudiger R van Stijn Tracey C TC Rowe Suzanne J SJ McEwan K Mary KM Clarke Shannon M SM

G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 20191007 10

Genotypes are often used to assign parentage in agricultural and ecological settings. Sequencing can be used to obtain genotypes but does not provide unambiguous genotype calls, especially when sequencing depth is low in order to reduce costs. In that case, standard parentage analysis methods no longer apply. A strategy for using low-depth sequencing data for parentage assignment is developed here. It entails the use of relatedness estimates along with a metric termed excess mismatch rate which, ...[more]

PMID: 31383721

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Parentage assignment is usually based on a limited number of unlinked, independent genomic markers (microsatellites, low-density single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), etc.). Classical methods for parentage assignment are exclusion-based (i.e. based on loci that violate Mendelian inheritance) or likelihood-based, assuming independent inheritance of loci. For true parent-offspring relations, genotyping errors cause apparent violations of Mendelian inheritance. Thus, the maximum proportion of such violations must be determined, which is complicated by variable call- and genotype error rates among loci and individuals. Recently, genotyping using high-density SNP chips has become available at lower cost and is increasingly used in genetics research and breeding programs. However, dense SNPs are not independently inherited, violating the assumptions of the likelihood-based methods. Hence, parentage assignment usually assumes a maximum proportion of exclusions, or applies likelihood-based methods on a smaller subset of independent markers. Our aim was to develop a fast and accurate trio parentage assignment method for dense SNP data without prior genotyping error- or call rate knowledge among loci and individuals. This genomic relationship likelihood (GRL) method infers parentage by using genomic relationships, which are typically used in genomic prediction models. RESULTS:Using 50 simulated datasets with 53,427 to 55,517 SNPs, genotyping error rates of 1-3% and call rates of?~?80 to 98%, GRL was found to be fast and highly (~?99%) accurate for parentage assignment. An iterative approach was developed for training using the evaluation data, giving similar accuracy. For comparison, we used the Colony2 software that assigns parentage and sibship simultaneously to increase the power of the likelihood-based method and found that it has considerably lower accuracy than GRL. We also compared GRL with an exclusion-based method in which one of the parameters was estimated using GRL assignments.This method was slightly more accurate than GRL. CONCLUSIONS:We show that GRL is a fast and accurate method of parentage assignment that can use dense, non-independent SNPs, with variable call rates and unknown genotyping error rates. By offering an alternative way of assigning parents, GRL is also suitable for estimating the expected proportion of inconsistent parent-offspring genotypes for exclusion-based models.

Project description:The development of high-throughput sequencing technologies is dramatically increasing the use of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the field of genetics, but most parentage studies of wild populations still rely on microsatellites. We developed a bioinformatic pipeline for identifying SNP panels that are informative for parentage analysis from restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) data. This pipeline includes options for analysis with or without a reference genome, and provides methods to maximize genotyping accuracy and select sets of unlinked loci that have high statistical power. We test this pipeline on small populations of Mexican gray wolf and bighorn sheep, for which parentage analyses are expected to be challenging due to low genetic diversity and the presence of many closely related individuals. We compare the results of parentage analysis across SNP panels generated with or without the use of a reference genome, and between SNPs and microsatellites. For Mexican gray wolf, we conducted parentage analyses for 30 pups from a single cohort where samples were available from 64% of possible mothers and 53% of possible fathers, and the accuracy of parentage assignments could be estimated because true identities of parents were known a priori based on field data. For bighorn sheep, we conducted maternity analyses for 39 lambs from five cohorts where 77% of possible mothers were sampled, but true identities of parents were unknown. Analyses with and without a reference genome produced SNP panels with ≥95% parentage assignment accuracy for Mexican gray wolf, outperforming microsatellites at 78% accuracy. Maternity assignments were completely consistent across all SNP panels for the bighorn sheep, and were 74.4% consistent with assignments from microsatellites. Accuracy and consistency of parentage analysis were not reduced when using as few as 284 SNPs for Mexican gray wolf and 142 SNPs for bighorn sheep, indicating our pipeline can be used to develop SNP genotyping assays for parentage analysis with relatively small numbers of loci.

Dataset Information

Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.

Publications

Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets