Two may be better than one: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade combination approaches in metastatic breast cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Page DB
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6783471 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Oncolytic viruses are lytic for many types of cancers but are attenuated or replication-defective in normal tissues. Aside from tumor lysis, oncolytic viruses can induce host immune responses against cancer cells and may thus be viewed as a form of immunotherapy. Although recent successes with checkpoint inhibitors have shown that enhancing antitumor immunity can be effective, the dynamic nature of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment presents significant hurdles to the broader application of these therapies. Targeting one immune-suppressive pathway may not be sufficient to eliminate tumors. Here we focus on the development of the combination of oncolytic virotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors designed to target the programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 signaling axis. We also discuss future directions for the clinical application of this novel combination therapy.
| S-EPMC6074764 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its receptor programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) modulate antitumor immunity and are major targets of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. However, clinical trials of anti-PD-L1 and anti-PD-1 antibodies in breast cancer demonstrate only modest efficacy. Furthermore, specific PD-L1 contributions in various tissue and cell compartments to antitumor immunity remain incompletely elucidated. Here we show that PD-L1 expression is markedly elevated in mature adipocytes versus preadipocytes. Adipocyte PD-L1 prevents anti-PD-L1 antibody from activating important antitumor functions of CD8+ T cells in vitro. Adipocyte PD-L1 ablation obliterates, whereas forced preadipocyte PD-L1 expression confers, these inhibitory effects. Pharmacologic inhibition of adipogenesis selectively reduces PD-L1 expression in mouse adipose tissue and enhances the antitumor efficacy of anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 antibodies in syngeneic mammary tumor models. Our findings provide a previously unappreciated approach to bolster anticancer immunotherapy efficacy and suggest a mechanism for the role of adipose tissue in breast cancer progression.
| S-EPMC6209395 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Expression of immune checkpoint ligands (ICLs) is necessary to trigger the inhibitory signal via immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs) in exhausted T cells under tumor immune microenvironment. Nevertheless,to our knowledge, ICL expression profile in cancer patients has not been investigated. Using previously reported RNA-seq data sets, we found that expression of ICLs was patient specific but their coexpression can be patterned in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Since the expression of PD-L1 and poliovirus receptor (PVR) among various ICLs was independently regulated, we could stratify the patients who were treated with anti-PD-1 later into 4 groups according to the expression level of PD-L1 and PVR. Of interest, high PVR and low PVR expressions in PD-L1-expressing patients enriched nonresponders and responders to PD-1 blockade, respectively, helping in further selection of responders. Using a genetically engineered cancer model, we also found that PVR-deficient and PD-L1-sufficient tumor-bearing mice were highly sensitive to anti-PD-1 therapy, whereas PVR-sufficient and PD-L1-deficient tumor-bearing mice were resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy. Taken together, our study provides a concept that combinatorial expression patterns of PVR and PD-L1 are key determinants for PD-1 blockade and furthermore suggest a better therapeutic usage of immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs).
| S-EPMC7453903 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 rescue T cells from exhausted status and revive immune response against cancer cells. Based on the immense success in clinical trials, ten α-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, zimberelimab, prolgolimab, and dostarlimab) and three α-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for various types of cancers. Nevertheless, the low response rate of α-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy remains to be resolved. For most cancer patients, PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is not the sole speed-limiting factor of antitumor immunity, and it is insufficient to motivate effective antitumor immune response by blocking PD-1/PD-L1 axis. It has been validated that some combination therapies, including α-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, targeted therapy, other immune checkpoint inhibitors, agonists of the co-stimulatory molecule, stimulator of interferon genes agonists, fecal microbiota transplantation, epigenetic modulators, or metabolic modulators, have superior antitumor efficacies and higher response rates. Moreover, bifunctional or bispecific antibodies containing α-PD-1/PD-L1 moiety also elicited more potent antitumor activity. These combination strategies simultaneously boost multiple processes in cancer-immunity cycle, remove immunosuppressive brakes, and orchestrate an immunosupportive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we summarized the synergistic antitumor efficacies and mechanisms of α-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with other therapies. Moreover, we focused on the advances of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies in clinical studies. Given the heterogeneity across patients and cancer types, individualized combination selection could improve the effects of α-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunomodulatory strategies and relieve treatment resistance.
| S-EPMC8780712 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immune checkpoint inhibition represents a major recent breakthrough in the treatment of malignant diseases including breast cancer. Blocking the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, has shown impressive antitumor activity and may lead to durable long-term disease control, especially in the triple-negative subtypes of breast cancer (TNBC). Although immune checkpoint blockade is generally well tolerated, specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may occur. This review summarizes the clinical efficacy, perspectives, and future challenges of using PD-1/PD-L1-directed antibodies in the treatment of breast cancer.
| S-EPMC5290437 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block the programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) receptors are the most clinically advanced tumor immunotherapies. Given the broad antitumor efficacy and novel mechanism of action, numerous combinatorial approaches incorporating PD-1/PD-L1 blockade have been suggested; herein we present a comprehensive analysis of these clinical trials. We queried clinicaltrials.gov for all PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs administered for cancer therapy with an end date of 4/30/2017. A total of 1,218 clinical trials met our search criteria. These trials have a planned enrollment of 227,190 patients, and approximately half (493) were initiated in 2016 alone. Of these over 1,200 trials, 916 combine PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with at least one additional therapy, ranging from traditional treatment modalities like surgery and chemoradiation to newer therapies like small molecule inhibitors and other immunotherapies. The staggering proliferation of clinical trials combining PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with disparate treatments necessitates careful accounting to maximize efficiency and highlight areas of unmet needs. We believe our analysis provides this data and expect it will facilitate the design of future clinical trials in this burgeoning area of oncology research.
| S-EPMC5889289 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osteosarcoma is one of the most common bone cancers in children. Most patients with metastatic osteosarcoma die of pulmonary disease and limited curative therapeutic options exist for such patients. We have previously shown that PD-1 limits the efficacy of CTL to mediate immune control of metastatic osteosarcoma in the K7M2 mouse model of pulmonary metastatic disease and that blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions can partially improve survival outcomes by enhancing the function of osteosarcoma-specific CTL. However, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade-treated mice eventually succumb to disease due to selection of PD-L1 mAb-resistant tumor cells. We investigated the mechanism of tumor cell resistance after blockade, and additional combinational therapies to combat resistance.We used an implantable model of metastatic osteosarcoma, and evaluated survival using a Log-rank test. Cellular analysis of the tumor was done post-mortem with flow cytometry staining, and evaluated using a T-test to compare treatment groups.We show here that T cells infiltrating PD-L1 antibody-resistant tumors upregulate additional inhibitory receptors, notably CTLA-4, which impair their ability to mediate tumor rejection. Based on these results we have tested combination immunotherapy with ?-CTLA-4 and ?-PD-L1 antibody blockade in the K7M2 mouse model of metastatic osteosarcoma and show that this results in complete control of tumors in a majority of mice as well as immunity to further tumor inoculation.Thus, combinational immunotherapy approaches to block additional inhibitory pathways in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma may provide new strategies to enhance tumor clearance and resistance to disease.
| S-EPMC4437699 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, as a treatment for many tumors, has shown good efficacy. However, responses to immunotherapy did not always occur or last long., i.e. primary or acquired resistance, even tumors were PD-L1 positive. Several oncogenic pathways, including PI3K/AKT activation by PTEN loss and NF-κB activation, induce PD-L1 expression and PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance. They also induce expression of CCL2, an inhibitory chemokine that blocks T cell tracking into the tumor by binding to CCR2 on the T cell surface. In this study, we showed that transglutaminase 2 (TG2), a post-translational modification enzyme, induced ubiquitin-proteasome dependent degradation of tumor suppressors including PTEN and IκBα by peptide cross-linking, inducing CCL2 as well as PD-L1 expression via PI3K/AKT and NF-κB activation. It also induced PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance because CCL2 was expressed despite increased PD-L1, which was blocked by PD-L1 inhibitor. We also revealed that inhibition of TG2, instead of PD-L1, restored T cell-dependent killing effect by blocking expression of both PD-L1 and CCL2 in PD-L1(+) triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. In addition, the TG2-expressing TNBC patient group showed higher PD-L1 expression incidence than did the TG2-negative TNBC patient group. In conclusion, TG2 induces primary PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance by inducing CCL2 expression. TG2 blockade can be utilized as an excellent therapeutic strategy to overcome PD-L1 inhibitor-resistance in PD-L1(+) TNBC patients. Our study suggested that PD-L1 expression alone might not always be a predictive biomarker for PD-L1(+) TNBC, but TG2 could be a useful predictive marker to select PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant TNBC patients.
| S-EPMC7539780 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis completely changed anticancer treatment strategies. However, despite the significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients undergoing these immunotherapy treatments, the only clinically accepted biomarker with some prediction capabilities for the outcome of the treatment is PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsies. Nevertheless, even when having PD-L1-positive tumors, numerous patients do not respond to these treatments. Considering the high cost of these therapies and the risk of immune-related adverse events during therapy, it is necessary to identify additional biomarkers that would facilitate stratifying patients in potential responders and non-responders before the start of immunotherapies. Here, we review the utility of PD-L1 expression not only in tumor cells but in immune system cells and their influence on the antitumor activity of immune cell subsets.
| S-EPMC7460585 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors is providing significant benefit to patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), both in overall survival and tolerability of treatment. Given the recent approval of the first checkpoint inhibitor in RCC, this review discusses the background and clinical data for checkpoint inhibition in RCC. Areas covered: This review introduces and discusses the basic biologic mechanisms of checkpoint inhibitor function and focuses on the current evidence in clinical trials for the use of immunotherapy in RCC. Expert commentary: Immunotherapy has been a mainstay of therapy in RCC, but the recent approval of nivolumab with ORR of 25% and durable responses has provided a transformative new therapeutic option.
| S-EPMC5555220 | biostudies-literature