Dataset Information

Comparison of a simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques for HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:We aimed to compare HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping results obtained by a simple-probe real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique with the multiplex PCR technique. METHODS:Five hundred DNA samples from the Thai National Stem Cell Donor Registry (TSCDR) of the National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society were included. Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping was performed by simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques. RESULTS:HPA-1, HPA-2, HPA-3, and HPA-4 genotyping results obtained by both techniques were in agreement. The misinterpretation of HPA-5, HPA-6, and HPA-15 genotypes was found in eight samples by simple-probe real-time PCR and HPA genotypes were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Two samples of HPA-5 were misinterpreted as HPA-5a5a instead of HPA-5a5b due to an NM_002203.3:c.1594A>C mutation (rs199808499) near the HPA-5 polymorphism (5' side). Five samples of HPA-6a6b were misinterpreted as HPA-6b6b because of an NM_000212.2:c.1545G>A mutation (rs4634) adjacent to the HPA-6 polymorphism (3' side). Interestingly, one sample of HPA-15a15b was misinterpreted as HPA-15b15b due to an NM_133493.1:c.2118C>A mutation near the HPA-15 polymorphism (3' side). CONCLUSIONS:HPA genotyping results by two PCR techniques were compared. Incorrect assignments were found due to genetic variations near each HPA single nucleotide polymorphism. Therefore, to avoid false assignation, the use of two genotyping techniques is recommended.

SUBMITTER: Kengkate M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6807192 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of a simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques for HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping.

Kengkate Mayuree M Butthep Punnee P Kupatawintu Pawinee P Srisuddee Atthapol A Chantratita Wasun W Nathalang Oytip O

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 20140328 2

<h4>Background</h4>We aimed to compare HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping results obtained by a simple-probe real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique with the multiplex PCR technique.<h4>Methods</h4>Five hundred DNA samples from the Thai National Stem Cell Donor Registry (TSCDR) of the National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society were included. Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping was performed by simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques.<h4>Results</h4>HPA-1, HPA ...[more]

PMID: 24687514

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPneumococcal serotype identification is essential to monitor pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness and serotype replacement. Serotyping by conventional serological methods are costly, labour-intensive, and require significant technical expertise. We compared two different molecular methods to serotype pneumococci isolated from the nasopharynx of South African infants participating in a birth cohort study, the Drakenstein Child Health Study, in an area with high 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) coverage.MethodsA real-time multiplex PCR (rmPCR) assay detecting 21 different serotypes/-groups and a sequetyping assay, based on the sequence of the wzh gene within the pneumococcal capsular locus, were compared. Forty pneumococcal control isolates, with serotypes determined by the Quellung reaction, were tested. In addition, 135 pneumococcal isolates obtained from the nasopharynx of healthy children were tested by both serotyping assays and confirmed by Quellung testing. Discordant results were further investigated by whole genome sequencing of four isolates.ResultsOf the 40 control isolates tested, 25 had a serotype covered by the rmPCR assay. These were all correctly serotyped/-grouped. Sequetyping PCR failed in 7/40 (18%) isolates. For the remaining isolates, sequetyping assigned the correct serotype/-group to 29/33 (88%) control isolates. Of the 132/135 (98%) nasopharyngeal pneumococcal isolates that could be typed, 69/132 (52%) and 112/132 (85%) were assigned the correct serotype/-group by rmPCR and sequetyping respectively. The serotypes of 63/132 (48%) isolates were not included in the rmPCR panel. All except three isolates (serotype 25A and 38) were theoretically amplified and differentiated into the correct serotype/-group with some strains giving ambigous results (serotype 13/20, 17F/33C, and 11A/D/1818F). Of the pneumococcal serotypes detected in this study, 69/91 (76%) were not included in the current PCV13. The most frequently identified serotypes were 11A, 13, 15B/15C, 16F and 10A.ConclusionThe rmPCR assay performed well for the 21 serotypes/-groups included in the assay. However, in our study setting, a large proportion of serotypes were not detected by rmPCR. The sequetyping assay performed well, but did misassign specific serotypes. It may be useful for regions where vaccine serotypes are less common, however confirmatory testing is advisable.

Dataset Information

Comparison of a simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques for HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping.

Publications

Comparison of a simple-probe real-time PCR and multiplex PCR techniques for HPA-1 to HPA-6 and HPA-15 genotyping.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets