Dataset Information

Different free prostate-specific antigen to total prostate-specific antigen ratios using three detecting systems.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used as an indicative marker of a pathologic condition of the prostate, and the ratio of free PSA (fPSA) to total PSA (tPSA) helps to distinguish benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we present some reversed ratios of fPSA to tPSA and analyze the possible mechanism.

Methods

Using the UniCel DxI800 Access Immunoassay System, eight reversed fPSA to tPSA ratios were obtained, and then these samples were retested with an Abbott Architect i2000 Immunoassay Analyser and Cobas e602.

Results

Four of the eight reversed ratios kept a ratio >1 using Abbott Architect i2000, and seven of them turned into a ratio <1 using Cobas e602.

Conclusion

In consideration of the assay these three detecting systems apply, the possible reason of the reversed ratios can be heterophile antibodies. To get accurate reason, further study is required.

SUBMITTER: Huang HQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6817054 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Different free prostate-specific antigen to total prostate-specific antigen ratios using three detecting systems.

Huang Hui-Qing HQ Zhang Yan Y Xu Hua-Guo HG

Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 20170406 2

<h4>Background</h4>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used as an indicative marker of a pathologic condition of the prostate, and the ratio of free PSA (fPSA) to total PSA (tPSA) helps to distinguish benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, we present some reversed ratios of fPSA to tPSA and analyze the possible mechanism.<h4>Methods</h4>Using the UniCel DxI800 Access Immunoassay System, eight reversed fPSA to tPSA ratios were obtained, and then these samples ...[more]

PMID: 28383168

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe lack of interchangeability among prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays causes difficulties in clinical interpretation. The currently available mainstream assays for PSA were based on Western populations, but it is not clear whether these assays yield different results in prostate cancer (PCa) screening in Chinese populations.MethodsA total of 163 men with a total PSA (tPSA) level of 2-10 µg/L scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled in this study. The levels of the tPSA and free PSA (fPSA) were detected by the Beckman (using the Hybritech calibration), Roche, Abbott, and Mindray (using the World Health Organization's calibration). Methodological comparison were performed according to EP9-A3 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA. With pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, the predictive accuracy of the biomarkers was quantified as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each of the four methods.ResultsA total of 32 PCa patients and 131 patients with benign prostate disease were included in this study. The tPSA levels detected by the Roche, Abbott, and Mindray showed good consistency with Beckman but not of the fPSA levels. Compared to the Beckman tPSA values, the measured values were 1.1% higher for Roche, 2.1% higher for Abbott, and 6.7% higher for Mindray. The fPSA levels measured by Roche, Abbott, and Mindray were 5.4% lower, 22.1% higher, and 4.6% higher than Beckman, respectively. When the tPSA was 4 ng/mL, the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and missed diagnosis rate) was similar among these 4 assays. When the %fPSA was 16%, Abbott had the highest missed diagnosis rate (37.50%), while Mindray had a sensitivity of 81.25%, the highest negative predictive value (93.88%), and the lowest missed diagnosis rate (18.75%).ConclusionsWhen the tPSA level is 2-10 ng/mL, the Mindray, like the Roche and Abbott, has good consistency with the Beckman in detecting tPSA, which makes it possible to relieve the pressure of clinical interpretation. However, 4 assays using the same %fPSA cut-off may lead to diverse missed diagnosis rates for PCa screening in China.

Project description:Late-stage prostate cancer often acquires resistance to conventional chemotherapies and transforms into a hormone-refractory, drug-resistant, and non-curative disease. Developing non-invasive tools to detect the biochemical changes that correlate with drug efficacy and reveal the onset of drug resistance would have important ramifications in managing the treatment regimen for individual patients. Here, we report the selection of new Designed Ankyrin Repeat Proteins (DARPins) that show high affinity toward prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a biomarker used in clinical monitoring of prostate cancer. Ribosome display and in vitro screening tools were used to select PSA-binding DARPins based on their binding affinity, selectivity, and chemical constitution. Surface plasmon resonance measurements demonstrated that the four lead candidates bind to PSA with nanomolar affinity. DARPins were site-specifically functionalised at a unique C-terminal cysteine with a hexadentate aza-nonamacrocyclic chelate (NODAGA) for subsequent radiolabelling with the positron-emitting radionuclide 68Ga. [68Ga]GaNODAGA-DARPins showed high stability toward transchelation and were stable in human serum for >2 h. Radioactive binding assays using streptavidin-loaded magnetic beads confirmed that the functionalisation and radiolabelling did not compromise the specificity of [68Ga]GaNODAGA-DARPins toward PSA. Biodistribution experiments in athymic nude mice bearing subcutaneous prostate cancer xenografts derived from the LNCaP cell line revealed that three of the four [68Ga]GaNODAGA-DARPins displayed specific tumour-binding in vivo. For DARPin-6, tumour-uptake in the normal group reached 4.16 ± 0.58% ID g-1 (n = 3; 2 h post-administration) and was reduced by ∼50% by competitive binding with a low molar activity formulation (blocking group: 2.47 ± 0.42% ID g-1; n = 3; P value = 0.018). Collectively, the experimental results support the future development of new PSA-specific imaging agents for potential use in monitoring the efficacy of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies.

Project description:Background and objectiveProstate-specific antigen (PSA) remains a critical marker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and monitoring. Recognising historical variability in PSA assays and the evolution of assay technology and calibration, this study aims to reassess interassay variability using the latest generation of five assays in a contemporary cohort of men undergoing prostate biopsy.MethodsFive different commercially available PSA assays were tested in a blood sample of 76 men before undergoing a prostate biopsy. Total PSA (tPSA) and free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA) were compared across assays, using Roche (Basel, Switzerland) as the benchmark, and correlated with biopsy outcome to analyse the impact on PCa diagnosis. The statistical analysis included Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots, with a p value threshold of <0.05 for significance.Key findings and limitationsAmong the 76 men, 28 (36.8%) were diagnosed with significant PCa (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≥2). A high correlation was observed between tPSA and %fPSA values among the different PSA assays tested (r2 ≥ 0.9). The Passing-Bablok analysis showed that tPSA results varied substantially among the assays, with slopes ranging between 0.78 and 1.04. Compared with the tPSA of Roche, tPSA values were on average 20.7% lower by Beckman (Oststeinbeck, Germany), 15.2% lower by Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA), 6.1% lower by Diasorin (Saluggia, Italy), and 9.6% higher by Brahms (Hennigsdorf, Germany; p < 0.001 for all). The %fPSA values by Abbott and Brahms were higher at 15.7% and 10.6%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the Beckman and Diasorin values had minimal differences of -0.3% and 2.3%, respectively (p > 0.05). The variability across assays would have resulted in discrepancies in both the sensitivity and the specificity for tPSA and %fPSA by at least 14%, depending on the cut-offs applied.Conclusions and clinical implicationsDespite the use of the latest PSA assays, relevant variability of tPSA and %fPSA results can be observed among different assays. There is an urgent need for standardised calibration methods and greater awareness among practitioners concerning interassay variability. Clinicians should acknowledge that clinically relevant thresholds may depend on the specific PSA assay and that ideally the same assay is applied over time for better clinical decision-making.Patient summaryProstate-specific antigen (PSA) is a critical marker for prostate cancer (PCa) detection and monitoring. However, significant variations were observed in the results of the latest PSA assays. Thus, standardised calibration methods and greater awareness among practitioners concerning interassay variability are needed.

Project description:BackgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has limited accuracy for the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa).ObjectiveTo assess the value added by percentage of free to total PSA (%fPSA), prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), and a kallikrein panel (4k-panel) to the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) multivariable prediction models: risk calculator (RC) 4, including transrectal ultrasound, and RC 4 plus digital rectal examination (4+DRE) for prescreened men.Design, setting, and participantsParticipants were invited for rescreening between October 2007 and February 2009 within the Dutch part of the ERSPC study. Biopsies were taken in men with a PSA level ≥3.0 ng/ml or a PCA3 score ≥10. Additional analyses of the 4k-panel were done on serum samples.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisOutcome was defined as PCa detectable by sextant biopsy. Receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analyses were performed to compare the predictive capabilities of %fPSA, PCA3, 4k-panel, the ERSPC RCs, and their combinations in logistic regression models.Results and limitationsPCa was detected in 119 of 708 men. The %fPSA did not perform better univariately or added to the RCs compared with the RCs alone. In 202 men with an elevated PSA, the 4k-panel discriminated better than PCA3 when modelled univariately (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.78 vs. 0.62; p=0.01). The multivariable models with PCA3 or the 4k-panel were equivalent (AUC: 0.80 for RC 4+DRE). In the total population, PCA3 discriminated better than the 4k-panel (univariate AUC: 0.63 vs. 0.56; p=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the multivariable model with PCA3 (AUC: 0.73) versus the model with the 4k-panel (AUC: 0.71; p=0.18). The multivariable model with PCA3 performed better than the reference model (0.73 vs. 0.70; p=0.02). Decision curves confirmed these patterns, although numbers were small.ConclusionsBoth PCA3 and, to a lesser extent, a 4k-panel have added value to the DRE-based ERSPC RC in detecting PCa in prescreened men.Patient summaryWe studied the added value of novel biomarkers to previously developed risk prediction models for prostate cancer. We found that inclusion of these biomarkers resulted in an increase in predictive ability.

Dataset Information

Different free prostate-specific antigen to total prostate-specific antigen ratios using three detecting systems.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Different free prostate-specific antigen to total prostate-specific antigen ratios using three detecting systems.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets