Dataset Information

Cell mechanosensing is regulated by substrate strain energy rather than stiffness.

ABSTRACT: The ability of cells to perceive the mechanical identity of extracellular matrix, generally known as mechanosensing, is generally depicted as a consequence of an intricate balance between pulling forces actuated by the actin fibers on the adhesion plaques and the mechanical reaction of the supporting material. However, whether the cell is sensitive to the stiffness or to the energy required to deform the material remains unclear. To address this important issue, here the cytoskeleton mechanics of BALB/3T3 and MC3T3 cells seeded on linearly elastic substrates under different levels of deformation were studied. In particular, the effect of prestrain on cell mechanics was evaluated by seeding cells both on substrates with no prestrain and on substrates with different levels of prestrain. Results indicated that cells recognize the existence of prestrain, exhibiting a stiffer cytoskeleton on stretched material compared to cells seeded on unstretched substrate. Cytoskeleton mechanics of cells seeded on stretched material were, in addition, comparable to those measured after the stretching of the substrate and cells together to the same level of deformation. This observation clearly suggests that cell mechanosensing is not mediated only by the stiffness of the substrate, as widely assumed in the literature, but also by the deformation energy associated with the substrate. Indeed, the clutch model, based on the exclusive dependence of cell mechanics upon substrate stiffness, fails to describe our experimental results. By modifying the clutch model equations to incorporate the dependence on the strain energy, we were able to correctly interpret the experimental evidence.

SUBMITTER: Panzetta V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6825315 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cell mechanosensing is regulated by substrate strain energy rather than stiffness.

Panzetta Valeria V Fusco Sabato S Netti Paolo A PA

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20190930 44

The ability of cells to perceive the mechanical identity of extracellular matrix, generally known as mechanosensing, is generally depicted as a consequence of an intricate balance between pulling forces actuated by the actin fibers on the adhesion plaques and the mechanical reaction of the supporting material. However, whether the cell is sensitive to the stiffness or to the energy required to deform the material remains unclear. To address this important issue, here the cytoskeleton mechanics o ...[more]

PMID: 31570575

Similar Datasets

Project description:Extracellular matrix stiffness has a profound effect on the behavior of many cell types. Adherent cells apply contractile forces to the material on which they adhere and sense the resistance of the material to deformation-its stiffness. This is dependent on both the elastic modulus and the thickness of the material, with the corollary that single cells are able to sense underlying stiff materials through soft hydrogel materials at low (<10 μm) thicknesses. Here, we hypothesized that cohesive colonies of cells exert more force and create more hydrogel deformation than single cells, therefore enabling them to mechanosense more deeply into underlying materials than single cells. To test this, we modulated the thickness of soft (1 kPa) elastic extracellular-matrix-functionalized polyacrylamide hydrogels adhered to glass substrates and allowed colonies of MG63 cells to form on their surfaces. Cell morphology and deformations of fluorescent fiducial-marker-labeled hydrogels were quantified by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy imaging. Single-cell spreading increased with respect to decreasing hydrogel thickness, with data fitting to an exponential model with half-maximal response at a thickness of 3.2 μm. By quantifying cell area within colonies of defined area, we similarly found that colony-cell spreading increased with decreasing hydrogel thickness but with a greater half-maximal response at 54 μm. Depth-sensing was dependent on Rho-associated protein kinase-mediated cellular contractility. Surface hydrogel deformations were significantly greater on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. In addition, deformations extended greater distances from the periphery of colonies on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. Our data suggest that by acting collectively, cells mechanosense rigid materials beneath elastic hydrogels at greater depths than individual cells. This raises the possibility that the collective action of cells in colonies or sheets may allow cells to sense structures of differing material properties at comparatively large distances.

Project description:Treating recurrent GBM is a clinical challenge due to its highly resistant and aggressive nature. In order to develop new therapeutic targets for recurrent GBM a better understanding of its molecular landscape is necessary. Here we used a cellular model, developed in our lab which generates paired primary and recurrent samples from GBM cell lines and primary patient samples hence allowing us to compare the molecular differences between the two populations. Total RNA seq analysis of parent and recurrent population of two cell lines and one patient sample revealed a significant upregulation of Extracellular matrix interaction in recurrent population. Since matrix stiffness plays a pivotal role in cell-ECM interaction and downstream signaling, we developed a system that mimicked the brain like substrate stiffness by using collagen coated polyacrylamide-based substrate whose stiffness can be modified from normal brain (0.5kPa) to tumorigenic (10kPa). Using these substrates, we were able to capture the morphological and physiological differences between parent and recurrent GBM which were not evident on plastic surfaces (~1 GPa). On 0.5kPa, unlike circular parent cells, recurrent GBM cells showed two morphologies (circular and elongated). The recurrent cells growing on 0.5kPa also showed higher proliferation, invasion, migration and in-vivo tumorigenicity in orthotropic GBM mouse model, compared to parent cells. Furthermore, recurrent cells exhibited elevated velocity irrespective of substrate stiffness, which indicated that recurrent cells may possess inherent differential mechanosignalling ability which was reflected by higher expression of ECM proteins like Collagen IVA, MMP2 and MMP9. Moreover, mice brain injected with recurrent cells grown on 0.5kPa substrate showed higher Young’s modulus values suggesting that recurrent cells conditioned on 0.5kPa make the surrounding ECM stiffer. Importantly, inhibition of EGFR signaling, that is amplified with tissue stiffening in GBM resulted in decreased invasion, migration and proliferation in 0.5kPa recurrent cells, but interestingly survival remained unaffected, highlighting the importance of mimicking the physiological stiffness of the brain mimicking clinical scenario. Total RNA seq analysis of parent and recurrent cells grown on plastic and 0.5kPa substrate identified PLEKHA7 as significantly upregulated gene specifically in 0.5kPa recurrent sample. Higher protein expression of PLEKHA7 in recurrent GBM as compared to primary GBM was validated in patient biopsies. Accordingly, PLEKHA7 knockdown reduced invasion and survival of recurrent GBM cells. Together, these data provides a model system that captures the differential mechanosensing signals of primary and recurrent GBM cells and identifies a novel potential target specific for recurrent GBM.

Dataset Information

Cell mechanosensing is regulated by substrate strain energy rather than stiffness.

Publications

Cell mechanosensing is regulated by substrate strain energy rather than stiffness.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets