Dataset Information

Qinwen Baidu decoction for sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Sepsis is the most common critical illness in the clinic, with a high incidence and mortality. Qingwen Baidu decoction (QWBDD) has been widely applied in the treatment of sepsis, however, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. Hence, we provide a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis.

Methods

The databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Clinical Trial Database, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and WanFang Database will be searched from the time when the respective databases were established to January 2019. All randomized controlled trials (RTCs) published in Chinese and English assessing QWBDD for sepsis will be included. Continuity data are expressed as mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous data is expressed as relative risk. Analyses will be performed by using RevMan V.5.3.5 software.

Results

This study will provide high-quality synthesis of current evidence of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis from the following aspects, including 28-day mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood lactate, procalcitonin (PCT), tumor necrosis factor-? (TNF-?), interleukin-6 (IL-6), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), acute physiology and chronic health score (APACHE-II), intensive care unit stay, mean hospital stay, mechanical ventilation time, etc. CONCLUSION:: Our systematic review will provide evidence for judging whether QWBDD is an effective intervention for sepsis.

Prospero registration number

PROSPERO CRD 42019123078.

SUBMITTER: Wang P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6831360 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Qinwen Baidu decoction for sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Ping P Huang Hefei H Zhong Jingya J Cai Hairong H Huang Yonglian Y Chen Dongjie D Huang Yaxiu Y Li Shaoping S Cao Qifeng Q Peng Xiaohong X

Medicine 20190301 9

<h4>Background</h4>Sepsis is the most common critical illness in the clinic, with a high incidence and mortality. Qingwen Baidu decoction (QWBDD) has been widely applied in the treatment of sepsis, however, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis. Hence, we provide a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of QWBDD in the treatment of sepsis.<h4>Methods</h4>The databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Emb ...[more]

PMID: 30817635

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInsomnia is a widespread complaint in the general population. Wendan decoction has been widely applied in the treatment of primary insomnia. However, to our knowledge, there has been no systematic review or meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails regarding the effectiveness of this treatment. Here, we provide a protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Wendan decoction for primary insomnia.Methods and analysisRelevant randomized controlled trials in 5 English databases [EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library), PubMed, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases (AMED), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)], 4 Chinese databases [Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Medical Current Content (CMCC), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database] will be comprehensively searched by 2 researchers in October 2017. The therapeutic effects according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) will be accepted as the primary outcomes. We will use RevMan V.5.3 software as well to compute the data synthesis carefully when a metaanalysis is allowed.ResultsThis study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of Wendan decoction for primary insomnia from several aspects including PSQI, the total scores of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), syndrome according to standards for assessing Traditional Chinese medicine and adverse events.ConclusionThe conclusion of our systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether Wendan decoction is an effective intervention for patient with primary insomnia.Ethics and disseminationThe outcomes of this systematic review will offer implications of the use of Wendan decoction treatment for primary insomnia patients. This knowledge informing recommendations will be provided by researchers who are interested in the treatment of primary insomnia. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at a conference and publication of the data in a peer-reviewed journal.Prospero registration numberPROSPERO CRD 42017065664.

Project description:IntroductionSepsis is associated with a dysregulated host response to infection and impaired endogenous corticosteroid metabolism. As such, therapeutic use of exogenous corticosteroids is a promising adjunctive intervention. Despite a large number of trials examining this research question, uncertainty persists regarding the effect of corticosteroids on survival in sepsis. Several large randomised controlled trials have been published recently prompting a re-evaluation of the available literature.Methods and analysisA rigorous and reproducible search and screening process from a Cochrane review on the same topic was comprehensive to October 2014. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the Cochrane trial registry and clinicaltrials.gov for eligible randomised controlled trials investigating the use of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis from September 2014. Outcomes have been chosen by a semi-independent guideline panel, created in the context of a parallel BMJ Rapid Recommendation on the topic. This panel includes clinicians, content experts, methodologists and patient representatives, who will help identify patient-important outcomes that are critical for deciding whether to use or not use corticosteroids in sepsis. Two reviewers will independently screen and identify eligible studies; a third reviewer will resolve any disagreements. We will use RevMan to pool effect estimates from included studies for each outcome using a random-effect model. We will present the results as relative risk with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes and as mean difference or standardised mean difference for continuous outcomes with 95% CI. We will assess the certainty of evidence at the outcome level using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We will conduct a priori subgroup analyses, which have been chosen by the parallel BMJ Rapid Recommendation panel.Ethics and disseminationThe aim of this systematic review is to summarise the updated evidence on the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis.Trial registration numberCRD42017058537.

Dataset Information

Qinwen Baidu decoction for sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Prospero registration number

Publications

Qinwen Baidu decoction for sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets