Dataset Information

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

ABSTRACT: To assess the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients and the various factors which affect the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients was the main aim of the study. A prospective longitudinal study with a sample size of 130 patients was done within the time period of one and a half years. Patients with biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated as per their treatment protocol either by combined modality or single modality. Follow up at the completion of treatment was done and the quality of life questionnaire was filled out. QoL was assessed pre-treatment and at 4 times at different stages of follow up period. Demographic data was also taken into consideration for comparison which showed that head and neck cancer is more common in the males (80%) between the age group of 35-50 years, chronic tobacco chewers (45%) with most common site of cancer being the oral cavity (61%). Majority of the patients presented at Stage IV of their disease (35%) with largest HRQoL changes seen within the first three months after commencement of treatment. The most debilitating modality of treatment was Surgery + CTRT. Detailed assessment of the various factors which hamper the QoL in head and neck cancer patients should be done by which we can provide quality care and a completely new view into the health care experience and improving patient satisfaction.

SUBMITTER: Sharma Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6848337 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Sharma Yojana Y Mishra Girish G Parikh Vibhuti V

Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India 20190225 Suppl 1

To assess the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients and the various factors which affect the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients was the main aim of the study. A prospective longitudinal study with a sample size of 130 patients was done within the time period of one and a half years. Patients with biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated as per their treatment protocol either by combined modality or single modality. Follow up at the completi ...[more]

PMID: 31742096

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeEpigenetic age acceleration (EAA) is robustly linked with mortality and morbidity. This study examined risk factors of EAA and its association with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy.Methods and materialsPatients without distant metastasis were enrolled and followed before and at the end of radiation therapy and at 6 and 12 months after radiation therapy. EAA was calculated with DNAmPhenoAge at all 4 time points. Risk factors included demographic characteristics, lifestyle, clinical characteristics, treatment-related symptoms, and blood biomarkers. Survival data were collected until August 2020, and QOL was measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-HNC.ResultsIncreased comorbidity, symptoms unrelated to human papilloma virus, and more severe treatment-related symptoms were associated with higher EAA (P = .03 to P < .001). A nonlinear association (quadratic) between body mass index (BMI) and EAA was observed: decreased BMI (<35 kg/m2; P = .04) and increased BMI (≥35 kg/m2; P = .01) were linked to higher EAA. Increased EAA (per year) was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.18; P = .004]; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .02] for EAA at 6 and 12 months after treatment, respectively) and PFS (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.02-1.19; P = .02]; HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P < .001]; and HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = .01]) for EAA before, immediately after, and 6 months after radiation therapy, respectively) and QOL over time (β = -0.61; P = .001). An average of 3.25 to 3.33 years of age acceleration across time, which was responsible for 33% to 44% higher HRs of OS and PFS, was observed in those who died or developed recurrence compared with those who did not (all P < .001).ConclusionsCompared with demographic and lifestyle factors, clinical characteristics were more likely to contribute to faster biological aging in patients with HNC. Acceleration in epigenetic age resulted in more aggressive adverse events, including OS and PFS. EAA could be considered as a marker for cancer outcomes, and decelerating aging could improve survival and QOL.

Project description:(1) Background: Head and neck cancer treatment, including advanced techniques like Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), presents challenges for maintaining patient quality of life (QoL). Thus, thoroughly investigating how radiation therapy (RT) affects patients has been proved essential. Derived by that, this study aims to understand the complex interactions between not only RT and QoL but also symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in three distinct time points of patient's treatment; (2) Methods: To achieve that, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires were used in combination with EORTC_RTOG scoring criteria and Spearman's rho statistical analysis for 74 patients with cancer undergoing VMAT radiation therapy; (3) Results: The results revealed a significant improvement in the Overall Health Index post-treatment, indicating a temporary decline during therapy followed by subsequent recovery, often surpassing pre-treatment QoL levels. Concurrently a reduction in symptomatology was observed, notably in pain, swallowing difficulties, and dry mouth, aligning with prior research indicating decreased symptom burden post-treatment. However, Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis at two distinct time points during therapy uncovered varying degrees of correlation between dosimetric data at Organs at Risk (OARs) and reported symptoms, highlighting potential limitations in using QoL questionnaires as sole indicators of treatment efficacy. Our investigation into the correlation between dosimetric data, toxicity, and symptoms focused on the relationship between radiation doses and oral mucositis levels, a common toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. Significant associations were identified between toxicity levels and dosimetric parameters, particularly with OARs such as the parotid glands, oral cavity, and swallowing muscles, underlining the utility of the EORTC method as a reliable toxicity assessment tool; (4) Conclusions: To summarize, current research attempts to underscore the importance of refining QoL assessments for enhanced patient care. The integration of dosimetric data, symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in the QoL outcomes of head and neck cancer patients undergoing VMAT radiation therapy, can lead towards the optimization of treatment strategies and the improvement of patient outcomes in future patient-centered radiation therapy practices.

Dataset Information

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Publications

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets