Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

With several options available for patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), rapidity of symptom resolution could be an important differentiator. We compared the efficacy and speed of onset of action of infliximab vs golimumab induction therapy using patient-level data from phase 3 trials (ACT-1, ACT-2, and PURSUIT-SC).

Methods

We compared differences in proportions of patients who achieved the composite outcome of a rectal bleeding score=0 and stool frequency score ?1 (patient-reported outcome 2 remission) at weeks 2 and 6 of treatment with standard-dose infliximab vs golimumab using logistic generalized estimating equation. Overall efficacy for inducing clinical remission (Mayo clinic score <3) was compared using logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for sex, disease extent, baseline clinical and endoscopic severity, C-reactive protein, albumin, body weight and concomitant medications (immunomosuppressives, corticosteroids, and 5-aminsalicylates).

Results

Trial populations were similar and no differences were observed among the placebo groups in the studies. A significantly higher proportion patients treated with infliximab than golimumab achieved patient-reported outcome 2 remission at week 2 (35% vs 30%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.15-2.55) and at week 6 (50.0% vs 38.9%; adjusted OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94). Infliximab-treated patients were also significantly more likely to achieve clinical remission than golimumab-treated patients (adjusted OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.95-4.70), with consistent findings in patients with moderate or severe UC.

Conclusions

Based on a patient-level analysis of data from phase 3 trials, infliximab resolves symptoms more rapidly and has greater efficacy for inducing remission than golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

SUBMITTER: Singh S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6858937 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Singh Siddharth S Proudfoot James A JA Dulai Parambir S PS Xu Ronghui R Feagan Brian G BG Sandborn William J WJ Jairath Vipul V

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 20190518 2

<h4>Background & aims</h4>With several options available for patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), rapidity of symptom resolution could be an important differentiator. We compared the efficacy and speed of onset of action of infliximab vs golimumab induction therapy using patient-level data from phase 3 trials (ACT-1, ACT-2, and PURSUIT-SC).<h4>Methods</h4>We compared differences in proportions of patients who achieved the composite outcome of a rectal bleeding score=0 and stool ...[more]

PMID: 31108227

Similar Datasets

Project description:The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous golimumab through 2 years of maintenance therapy was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).Patients completing treatment through week 52 (placebo, golimumab 50, 100, every-4-weeks (q4w)) and evaluations at week 54 were eligible for this long-term extension (LTE) trial. Patients receiving placebo or golimumab 50?mg with worsening disease during the LTE could receive golimumab 100?mg. Efficacy assessments included the Mayo physician's global assessment (PGA) subscore, inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ), and corticosteroid use. Patients who were randomized to golimumab at PURSUIT-Maintenance baseline and continued receiving golimumab during the LTE were analyzed for efficacy (using intention-to-treat and "as observed" analyses; N=195) and safety (N=200). Patients treated with golimumab at any time from induction baseline through week 104 (N=1240) constituted the overall safety population.Baseline demographics and disease characteristics of patients entering the LTE receiving golimumab were similar to those of all patients randomized to golimumab maintenance at baseline. At week 104, 80.5% (157/195) of patients had a PGA=0/1 (range weeks 56-104: 80.5-91.8%) and 56.4% (110/195) had a PGA=0 (weeks 56-104: range: 53.8-58.5%). Through week 104, 86% of patients maintained inactive or mild disease activity. Among 174 corticosteroid-free patients at week 54, 88.5% remained corticosteroid-free at week 104. At week 104, 62.2% (120/193) had an IBDQ score ?170. Tuberculosis, opportunistic infection, and malignancy rates were low, and the overall safety profile was similar to that reported through week 54. Two non-melanoma skin cancers, one metastatic colon cancer, and two deaths (biventricular heart dysfunction, sepsis) occurred between weeks 54 and 104.Subcutaneous golimumab q4w through 2 years maintained clinical benefit and reduced corticosteroid use among patients who did well in the maintenance study. No new safety signals were observed.

Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure