Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

With several options available for patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), rapidity of symptom resolution could be an important differentiator. We compared the efficacy and speed of onset of action of infliximab vs golimumab induction therapy using patient-level data from phase 3 trials (ACT-1, ACT-2, and PURSUIT-SC).

Methods

We compared differences in proportions of patients who achieved the composite outcome of a rectal bleeding score=0 and stool frequency score ?1 (patient-reported outcome 2 remission) at weeks 2 and 6 of treatment with standard-dose infliximab vs golimumab using logistic generalized estimating equation. Overall efficacy for inducing clinical remission (Mayo clinic score <3) was compared using logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for sex, disease extent, baseline clinical and endoscopic severity, C-reactive protein, albumin, body weight and concomitant medications (immunomosuppressives, corticosteroids, and 5-aminsalicylates).

Results

Trial populations were similar and no differences were observed among the placebo groups in the studies. A significantly higher proportion patients treated with infliximab than golimumab achieved patient-reported outcome 2 remission at week 2 (35% vs 30%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.15-2.55) and at week 6 (50.0% vs 38.9%; adjusted OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.40-2.94). Infliximab-treated patients were also significantly more likely to achieve clinical remission than golimumab-treated patients (adjusted OR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.95-4.70), with consistent findings in patients with moderate or severe UC.

Conclusions

Based on a patient-level analysis of data from phase 3 trials, infliximab resolves symptoms more rapidly and has greater efficacy for inducing remission than golimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

SUBMITTER: Singh S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6858937 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Singh Siddharth S Proudfoot James A JA Dulai Parambir S PS Xu Ronghui R Feagan Brian G BG Sandborn William J WJ Jairath Vipul V

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 20190518 2

<h4>Background & aims</h4>With several options available for patients with moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), rapidity of symptom resolution could be an important differentiator. We compared the efficacy and speed of onset of action of infliximab vs golimumab induction therapy using patient-level data from phase 3 trials (ACT-1, ACT-2, and PURSUIT-SC).<h4>Methods</h4>We compared differences in proportions of patients who achieved the composite outcome of a rectal bleeding score=0 and stool ...[more]

PMID: 31108227

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhile indirect comparison of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) shows that IFX has better effectiveness during induction, and comparable efficacy during maintenance treatment, comparative data specific to subcutaneous (SC) IFX (i.e., CT-P13 SC) versus VDZ are limited.AimPooled analysis of randomised studies to compare efficacy and safety with IFX SC and VDZ in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.MethodsParallel-group, randomised studies evaluating IFX SC and VDZ in patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC were identified. Eligible studies reported ≥ 1 prespecified outcome of interest at Week 6 (reflecting treatment during the induction phase) and/or at 1 year (Weeks 50-54; reflecting treatment during the maintenance phase). Prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes considered in this pooled analysis included the proportions of patients achieving disease-specific clinical responses, clinical remission, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, or discontinuing due to AEs. Data from multiple studies or study arms were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model; comparative analyses were performed separately for patients with CD and UC.ResultsWe identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ. In patients with CD, intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy (overlapping 95% CIs) than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In patients with UC, efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year.ConclusionIFX SC demonstrated better efficacy than VDZ in patients with CD, and similar efficacy to VDZ in patients with UC; 1-year safety was comparable with IFX SC and VDZ.

Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, but there are few reports comparing elderly UC patients undergoing colectomy for elderly-onset UC (EO) and nonelderly-onset UC (NEO). The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between EO and NEO patients who underwent UC-related surgery.MethodsWe identified 1973 patients with UC who underwent colectomy at Hyogo College of Medicine between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 2018. Only patients aged 65 years old and older who underwent colectomy were enrolled in this study (n = 221, 11.2%), and their clinical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age at disease onset: those with onset at younger than 60 years old (NEO) and at 60 years old or older (EO).ResultsIn the 221 UC patients who underwent colectomy at 65 years old or older, there were 155 cases of EO and 66 cases of NEO. The main surgical indication in NEO patients was colitis-associated cancer/dysplasia (32/66, 47%). In contrast, refractory to medical treatment was the leading cause of surgery in EO patients (80/155, 52%). The distributions of surgical indications were different between the two groups (p < 0.01). The preoperative daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the EO group than in the NEOgroup (0 mg vs. 10 mg, p < 0.01). The rates of immunosuppressant, infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab use did not differ significantly between the groups. Significantly more patients underwent emergency surgery in the EO group than in the NEO group (14% vs. 35%, p < 0.01). The proportions of patients with postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) were 17.4% (27/155) in the EO group and 13.6% (9/66) in the NEO group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.48). The prognosis of the EO patients who underwent UC-related emergency surgery was worse than that of the NEO patients (p < 0.01). In the EO group, 8 (14.8%) of 54 patients died within 30 postoperative days, while there were no deaths in the NEO group.ConclusionAmong elderly UC patients undergoing UC-related surgery, EO patients undergoing emergency surgery had very poor outcomes, and the mortality rate was 14.8%. In such cases, it is important for physicians and surgeons to begin communication at an early stage so that the optimal surgical timeframe is not missed.

Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparative Efficacy and Speed of Onset of Action of Infliximab vs Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets