Dataset Information

Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

ABSTRACT: A quasi-experimental field study was undertaken to examine whether the source credibility of point-of-decision (POD) prompts would affect their effectiveness in increasing stair use. POD prompts attributed either to a more credible source, a less credible source, or nothing were randomly installed in three student halls of residence at a public university in Hong Kong (plus a control). The stair and elevator use of residents were recorded by view-from-top surveillance cameras and counted using motion-detection software, resulting in 14,189 observations. The findings show that all the POD prompts can yield, as hypothesized, a significant positive effect on stair use. The relative increase in stair use was 2.49% on average. However, contrary to our second hypothesis, the POD prompt attributed to the more credible source was not the most effective intervention. The implications of these findings are discussed in conclusion.

SUBMITTER: Lee IP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6872137 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

Lee Ivan P IP Walker Richard M RM

PloS one 20191121 11

A quasi-experimental field study was undertaken to examine whether the source credibility of point-of-decision (POD) prompts would affect their effectiveness in increasing stair use. POD prompts attributed either to a more credible source, a less credible source, or nothing were randomly installed in three student halls of residence at a public university in Hong Kong (plus a control). The stair and elevator use of residents were recorded by view-from-top surveillance cameras and counted using m ...[more]

PMID: 31751401

Similar Datasets

Project description:For a continuous healthcare or environmental monitoring system, it is essential to reliably sense the analyte concentration reported by electrochemical sensors. However, environmental perturbation, sensor drift, and power-constraint make reliable sensing with wearable and implantable sensors difficult. While most studies focus on improving sensor stability and precision by increasing the system's complexity and cost, we aim to address this challenge using low-cost sensors. To obtain the desired accuracy from low-cost sensors, we borrow two fundamental concepts from communication theory and computer science. First, inspired by reliable data transmission over a noisy communication channel by incorporating redundancy, we propose to measure the same quantity (i.e., analyte concentration) with multiple sensors. Second, we estimate the true signal by aggregating the output of the sensors based on their credibility, a technique originally developed for "truth discovery" in social sensing applications. We use the Maximum Likelihood Estimation to estimate the true signal and the credibility index of the sensors over time. Using the estimated signal, we develop an on-the-fly drift-correction method to make unreliable sensors reliable by correcting any systematic drifts during operation. Our approach can determine solution pH within 0.09 pH for more than three months by detecting and correcting the gradual drift of pH sensors as a function of gamma-ray irradiation. In the field study, we validate our method by measuring nitrate levels in an agricultural field onsite over 22 days within 0.06 mM of a high-precision laboratory-based sensor. We theoretically demonstrate and numerically validate that our approach can estimate the true signal even when the majority (~ 80%) of the sensors are unreliable. Moreover, by restricting wireless transmission to high-credible sensors, we achieve near-perfect information transfer at a fraction of the energy cost. The high-precision sensing with low-cost sensors at reduced transmission cost will pave the way for pervasive in-field sensing with electrochemical sensors. The approach is general and can improve the accuracy of any field-deployed sensors undergoing drift and degradation during operation.

Project description:IntroductionStair falls can be caused by inconsistent stair dimensions. During ascent, inconsistently taller stair risers lead to reduced foot clearances as the inconsistency goes unnoticed. A stair horizontal-vertical illusion increases perceived riser heights and foot clearance and could offset reduced foot clearances over inconsistently taller risers, though this might impact other stair safety measures.MethodTwelve participants (age: 22 (3) years) ascended a seven-step staircase under three conditions: i) all steps consistent in riser height (consistent), ii) a 1cm increase in step 5 riser height (inconsistent) and iii) a 1cm increase in step 5 riser height, superimposed with a stair horizontal-vertical illusion (illusion). Vertical foot clearance, foot overhang, and margins of stability were assessed over step 4, 5 and 6. Perceived riser height due to the illusion was determined through a computer perception test. A One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA compared biomechanical variables between conditions. A One Sample t test compared perceived riser height to the true height.ResultsOver the inconsistent step 5, foot clearance reduced by 0.8cm compared to consistent. Illusion increased foot clearance by 1.1cm and decreased foot overhang by 4% compared to inconsistent. On step 4 the illusion led to more anterior instability compared to inconsistent. Illusion and inconsistent led to more mediolateral stability compared to consistent. The illusion increased perceived riser height by 12%.DiscussionFoot clearance reductions over inconsistently taller risers can be offset by a stair horizontal-vertical illusion. Additional benefits included a safer foot overhang and unaffected stability over the inconsistent riser. Changes to step 4 stability might have resulted from leaning forward to look at the step 5 illusion. The stair horizontal-vertical illusion could be a practical solution for inconsistently taller stair risers, where a rebuild is usually the only solution.

Dataset Information

Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

Publications

Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets