Dataset Information

Study of indications for cardiac device implantation and utilisation in Fabry cardiomyopathy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Fabry disease is a treatable X-linked condition leading to progressive cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia and premature death. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias contribute significantly to adverse prognosis; however, guidance to determine which patients require cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is sparse. We aimed to evaluate indications for implantation practice in the UK and quantify device utilisation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we included demographic, clinical and imaging data from patients in four of the largest UK Fabry centres. Ninety patients with Fabry disease were identified with CIEDs implanted between June 2001 and February 2018 (FD-CIED group). To investigate differences in clinical and imaging markers between those with and without devices, these patients were compared with 276 patients without a CIED (FD-control).

Results

In the FD-CIED group, 92% of patients with permanent pacemakers but only 28% with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators had a class 1 indication for implantation. A further 44% of patients had defibrillators inserted for primary prevention outside of current guidance. The burden of arrhythmia requiring treatment in the FD-CIED group was high (asymptomatic atrial fibrillation:29%; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring medical therapy alone: 26%; sustained ventricular tachycardia needing anti-tachycardia pacing/defibrillation: 28%). Those with devices were older, had greater LV mass, more scar tissue and larger atrial size.

Conclusions

Arrhythmias are common in Fabry patients. Those with cardiac devices had high rates of atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation and ventricular arrhythmia needing device treatment. These are as high as those in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, supporting the need for Fabry-specific indications for device implantation.

SUBMITTER: Vijapurapu R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6900228 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The incidence and predictive factors of arrhythmias and/or conduction abnormalities (ACAs) requiring cardiac device (CD) implantation are poorly characterized in Fabry disease (FD). The aim of our retrospective study was to determine the prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with ACA requiring CD implantation in a monocentric cohort of patients with confirmed FD who were followed up in a department of internal medicine and reference center for FD.Forty-nine patients (20M, 29F) were included. Nine patients (4M, 5F; 18%) had at least one episode of ACA leading to device therapy. Six patients (4M/2F) required a pacemaker (PM) for sinus node dysfunction (n?=?4) or atrioventricular disease (n?=?2). One female patient required an internal cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) to prevent sudden cardiac death because of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (nSVT). One female patient required PM-ICD for sinus node dysfunction and nSVT. One patient underwent CD implantation before the diagnosis of FD. The annual rate of CD implantation was estimated at 1.90 per 100 person years. On univariate analysis at the end of the follow-up period, the factors associated with ACAs requiring CD implantation were as follows: delayed diagnosis of FD, delayed initiation of enzyme replacement therapy, age at the last follow-up visit, and severe multiorgan phenotype (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, chronic kidney disease, and/or sensorineural hearing loss). On multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis of FD and age at the last follow-up visit were independently associated with an increased risk of ACAs requiring CD (P?<?0.05).Considering the high frequency of ACAs requiring CD implantation and the risk of sudden death in patients with FD, regular monitoring is mandatory, especially in patients with a late diagnosis of FD and/or with a severe phenotype. Regular Holter ECGs, therapeutic education of patients, and deliverance of an emergency card including a phenotype summary are crucial in the care of FD patients.Available guidelines for device therapy and the efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy for arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities are discussed.

Project description:BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response assessment relies on the QRS complex narrowing criterion. Yet one third of patients do not improve despite narrowed QRS after implantation. Electromechanical wave imaging (EWI) is a quantitative echocardiography-based technique capable of noninvasively mapping cardiac electromechanical activation in three dimensions. The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the EWI technique, sensitive to ventricular dyssynchrony, for informing CRT response on the day of implantation.MethodsForty-four patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block or right ventricular (RV) paced rhythm and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; mean, 25.3 ± 9.6%) underwent EWI without and with CRT within 24 hours of device implantation. Of those, 16 were also scanned while in left ventricular (LV) pacing. Improvement in LVEF at 3-, 6-, or 9-month follow-up defined (1) super-responders (ΔLVEF ≥ 20%), (2) responders (10% ≤ ΔLVEF < 20%), and (3) nonresponders (ΔLVEF ≤ 5%). Three-dimensionally rendered electromechanical maps were obtained under RV, LV, and biventricular CRT pacing conditions. Mean RV free wall and LV lateral wall activation times were computed. The percentage of resynchronized myocardium was measured by quantifying the percentage of the left ventricle activated within 120 msec of QRS onset. Correlations between percentage of resynchronized myocardium and type of CRT response were assessed.ResultsLV lateral wall activation time was significantly different (P ≤ .05) among all three pacing conditions in the 16 patients: LV lateral wall activation time with CRT in biventricular pacing (73.1 ± 17.6 msec) was lower compared with LV pacing (89.5 ± 21.5 msec) and RV pacing (120.3 ± 17.8 msec). Retrospective analysis showed that the percentage of resynchronized myocardium with CRT was a reliable response predictor within 24 hours of implantation for significantly (P ≤ .05) identifying super-responders (n = 7; 97.7 ± 1.9%) from nonresponders (n = 17; 89.9 ± 9.9%).ConclusionElectromechanical activation mapping constitutes a valuable three-dimensional visualization tool within 24 hours of implantation and could potentially aid in the timely assessment of CRT response rates, including during implantation for adjustment of lead placement and pacing outcomes.