Dataset Information

Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset).

ABSTRACT: This article presents dataset of network meta-analysis (NMA) and systemic review, entitled, Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries: A network meta-analysis Yoon SW et al., 2019. The data tables demonstrate numeric values for endpoints: oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, and gastric tube insertion success rate for each supraglottic airway device (SAD). All relevant randomized controlled trials published up to 31 March 2018 were collected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar databases. 26 studies with a total of 2142 patients that included eight different SADs were included. The data described in this article are available as a supplementary file.

SUBMITTER: Yoon SW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6909156 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset).

Yoon Sang Won SW Kang Hyun H Choi Geun Joo GJ Ryu Choongun C Park Yong Hee YH Baek Chong Wha CW Jung Yong Hun YH Woo Young Cheol YC

Data in brief 20191121

This article presents dataset of network meta-analysis (NMA) and systemic review, entitled, <i>Comparison of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries: A network meta-analysis</i> Yoon SW et al., 2019. The data tables demonstrate numeric values for endpoints: oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) before and after pneumoperitoneum, and gastric tube insertion success rate for each supraglottic airway device (SAD). All relev ...[more]

PMID: 31871993

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNasopharyngeal tubes are useful in pediatric anesthesia for insufflating oxygen and anesthetics. During nasopharyngeal tube-anesthesia, gas insufflation provides some positive oropharyngeal pressure that differs from the proximal airway pressure owing to the flow-dependent pressure drop across the nasopharyngeal tube (ΔPNPT ).AimsThis study aimed to investigate whether ΔPNPT could be used for calculating oropharyngeal pressure during nasopharyngeal tube-assisted anesthesia.MethodsIn a physical model of nasopharyngeal tube-anesthesia, using Rohrer's equation, we calculated ΔPNPT for three nasopharyngeal tubes (3.5, 4.0, and 5.0 mm inner diameter) under oxygen and several sevoflurane in oxygen combinations in two ventilatory scenarios (continuous positive airway pressure and intermittent positive pressure ventilation). We then calculated oropharyngeal pressure as proximal airway pressure minus ΔPNPT . Calculated and measured oropharyngeal pressure couples of values were compared with the root mean square deviation to assess accuracy. We also investigated whether oropharyngeal pressure accuracy depends on the nasopharyngeal tube diameter, flow rate, gas composition, and leak size. Using ΔPNPT charts, we tested whether ΔPNPT calculation was feasible in clinical practice.ResultsWhen we tested small-diameter nasopharyngeal tubes at high-flow or high-peak inspiratory pressure, proximal airway pressure measurements markedly overestimated oropharyngeal pressure. Comparing measured and calculated maximum and minimum oropharyngeal pressure couples yielded root mean square deviations less than 0.5 cmH2 O regardless of ventilatory modality, nasopharyngeal tube diameter, flow rate, gas composition, and leak size.ConclusionDuring nasopharyngeal tube-assisted anesthesia, proximal airway pressure readings on the anesthetic monitoring machine overestimate oropharyngeal pressure especially for smaller-diameter nasopharyngeal tubes and higher flow, and to a lesser extent for large leaks. Given the importance of calculating oropharyngeal pressure in guiding nasopharyngeal tube ventilation in clinical practice, we propose an accurate calculation using Rohrer's equation method, or approximating oropharyngeal pressure from flow and pressure readings on the anesthetic machine using the ΔPNPT charts.

Project description:IntoductionIn veterinary medicine, airway management of cats under general anesthesia is performed with an endotracheal tube (ETT) or supraglottic airway device (SGAD). This study aims to describe the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to assess the velocities, pressures, and resistances of cats with ETT or SGAD.MethodsA geometrical reconstruction model of the device, trachea, and lobar bronchi was carried out from computed tomography (CT) scans that include the head, neck, and thorax. Twenty CT scans of cats under general anesthesia using ETT (n = 10) and SGAD (n = 10) were modeled and analyzed. An inspiratory flow of 2.4 L/min was imposed in each model and velocity (m/s), general and regional pressures (cmH2O) were computed. General resistance (cmH2O/L/min) was calculated using differential pressure differences between the device inlet and lobar bronchi. Additionally, regional resistances were calculated at the device's connection with the breathing circuit (region A), at the glottis area for the SGAD, and the area of the ETT exit (bevel) (region B) and the device itself (region C).ResultsRecirculatory flow and high velocities were found at the ETT's bevel and at the glottis level in the SGAD group. The pressure gradient (Δp) was more enhanced in the ETT cases compared with the SGAD cases, where the pressure change was drastic. In region A, the Δp was higher in the ETT group, while in regions B and C, it was higher in the SGAD group. The general resistance was not statistically significant between groups (p = 0.48). Higher resistances were found at the region A (p = <0.001) in the ETT group. In contrast, the resistance was higher in the SGAD cases at the region B (p = 0.001).DiscussionOverall, the provided CT-based CFD analysis demonstrated regional changes in airway pressure and resistance between ETT and SGAD during anesthetic flow conditions. Correct selection of the airway device size is recommended to avoid upper airway obstruction or changes in flow parameters.

Project description:BACKGROUND:In pressure-controlled (PC) ventilation, tidal volume (V T) and transpulmonary pressure (P L ) result from the addition of ventilator pressure and the patient's inspiratory effort. PC modes can be classified into fully, partially, and non-synchronized modes, and the degree of synchronization may result in different V T and P L despite identical ventilator settings. This study assessed the effects of three PC modes on V T, P L , inspiratory effort (esophageal pressure-time product, PTPes), and airway occlusion pressure, P 0.1. We also assessed whether P 0.1 can be used for evaluating patient effort. METHODS:Prospective, randomized, crossover physiologic study performed in 14 spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients recovering from acute respiratory failure (1 subsequently withdrew). PC modes were fully (PC-CMV), partially (PC-SIMV), and non-synchronized (PC-IMV using airway pressure release ventilation) and were applied randomly; driving pressure, inspiratory time, and set respiratory rate being similar for all modes. Airway, esophageal pressure, P 0.1, airflow, gas exchange, and hemodynamics were recorded. RESULTS:V T was significantly lower during PC-IMV as compared with PC-SIMV and PC-CMV (387 ± 105 vs 458 ± 134 vs 482 ± 108 mL, respectively; p < 0.05). Maximal P L was also significantly lower (13.3 ± 4.9 vs 15.3 ± 5.7 vs 15.5 ± 5.2 cmH2O, respectively; p < 0.05), but PTPes was significantly higher in PC-IMV (215.6 ± 154.3 vs 150.0 ± 102.4 vs 130.9 ± 101.8 cmH2O × s × min-1, respectively; p < 0.05), with no differences in gas exchange and hemodynamic variables. PTPes increased by more than 15% in 10 patients and by more than 50% in 5 patients. An increased P 0.1 could identify high levels of PTPes. CONCLUSIONS:Non-synchronized PC mode lowers V T and P L in comparison with more synchronized modes in spontaneously breathing patients but can increase patient effort and may need specific adjustments. Clinical Trial Registration Clinicaltrial.gov # NCT02071277.

Dataset Information

Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset).

Publications

Data for oropharyngeal leak pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and gastric tube insertion success rate of supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries (A network meta-analysis dataset).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets