Dataset Information

Choice of Reference Creatinine for Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Acute kidney injury (AKI) after trauma is associated with poor outcomes. According to current guidelines, a diagnosis of AKI should be made based on an increase in serum creatinine from a reference value. However, a true reference is often unknown in patients presenting with traumatic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal reference creatinine estimate for post-traumatic AKI diagnosis and staging. The optimal reference estimate was defined by a high incidence, strong prognostic ability, and incrementality at each stage. STUDY DESIGN:This was a cohort study of adult trauma patients (older than 16 years) requiring ICU admission between 2009 and 2018 (n = 8,026) at a single Level I trauma center. AKI was determined using the following 4 reference creatinine estimates: Modified Diet of Renal Diseases (MDRD), Trauma MDRD, admission creatinine, and the first-day creatinine nadir. Inclusivity was assessed by incidence of AKI diagnosed with different reference creatinine estimates; prognostic ability was assessed by multivariable modified Poisson regression; and incrementality was assessed by correlation of mortality risk by AKI stage. RESULTS:There was a wide range of AKI incidence, from 21% when using admission creatinine to 76% using the Trauma MDRD. The MDRD reference creatinine estimate resulted in an AKI incidence of 41% and a diagnosis that was both prognostic of mortality and incremental with each AKI stage. All other reference estimates resulted in AKI diagnoses that were either not prognostic or not incremental. CONCLUSIONS:Reference creatinine estimate determines the clinical importance of AKI diagnoses. In this study, the MDRD reference resulted in optimal AKI diagnoses.

SUBMITTER: Hatton GE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6909921 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Choice of Reference Creatinine for Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis.

Hatton Gabrielle E GE Du Reginald E RE Pedroza Claudia C Wei Shuyan S Harvin John A JA Finkel Kevin W KW Wade Charles E CE Kao Lillian S LS

Journal of the American College of Surgeons 20190920 6

<h4>Background</h4>Acute kidney injury (AKI) after trauma is associated with poor outcomes. According to current guidelines, a diagnosis of AKI should be made based on an increase in serum creatinine from a reference value. However, a true reference is often unknown in patients presenting with traumatic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal reference creatinine estimate for post-traumatic AKI diagnosis and staging. The optimal reference estimate was defined by a high inciden ...[more]

PMID: 31546013

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMissing preadmission serum creatinine (SCr) values are a common obstacle to assess acute kidney injury (AKI) diagnosis and outcomes. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines suggest using a SCr computed from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 75 ml/min/1.73 m2. We aimed to identify the best surrogate method for baseline SCr to assess AKI diagnosis and outcomes.MethodsWe compared the use of 1) first SCr at hospital admission 2) minimal SCr over 2 weeks after intensive care unit admission 3) MDRD computed SCr and 4) Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) computed SCr to assess AKI diagnosis and outcomes. We then performed multilinear regression models to predict preadmission SCr and imputation strategies to assess AKI diagnosis.ResultsOur one-year retrospective cohort study included 1001 critically ill adults; 498 of them had preadmission SCr values. In these patients, AKI incidence was 25.1% using preadmission SCr. First SCr had the best agreement for AKI diagnosis (22.5%; kappa?=?0.90) and staging (kappa?=?0.81). MDRD, CKD-EPI and minimal SCr overestimated AKI diagnosis (26.7%, 27.1% and 43.2%;kappa?=?0.86, 0.86 and 0.60, respectively). However, MDRD and CKD-EPI computed SCr had a better sensitivity than first SCr for AKI (93% and 94% vs. 87%). Eighty-eight percent of patients experienced renal recovery at least 3 months after hospital discharge. All methods except the first SCr significantly underestimated the percentage of renal recovery. In a multivariate model, age, male gender, hypertension, heart failure, undergoing surgery and log first SCr best predicted preadmission SCr (adjusted R2?=?0.56). Imputation methods with first SCr increased AKI incidence to 23.9% (kappa?=?0.92) but not with MDRD computed SCr (26.7%;kappa?=?0.89).ConclusionIn our cohort, first SCr performed better for AKI diagnosis and staging, as well as for renal recovery after hospital discharge than MDRD, CKD-EPI or minimal SCr. However, MDRD SCr and CKD-EPI SCr improved AKI diagnosis sensitivity. Imputation methods minimally increased agreement for AKI diagnosis.

Project description:The diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI), which is currently defined as an increase in serum creatinine (Scr) concentration, provides little information on the condition's actual cause. To improve phenotyping of AKI, many urinary biomarkers of tubular injury are being investigated. Because AKI cases are not frequently biopsied, the diagnostic accuracy of concentrations of Scr and urinary biomarkers for histologic acute tubular injury is unknown.Cross-sectional analysis from multicenter prospective cohort.Hospitalized deceased kidney donors on whom kidney biopsies were performed at the time of organ procurement for histologic evaluation.(1) AKI diagnosed by change in Scr concentration during donor hospitalization and (2) concentrations of urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], liver-type fatty acid-binding protein [L-FABP], interleukin 18 [IL-18], and kidney injury molecule 1 [KIM-1]) measured at organ procurement.Histologic acute tubular injury.Of 581 donors, 98 (17%) had mild acute tubular injury and 57 (10%) had severe acute tubular injury. Overall, Scr-based AKI had poor diagnostic performance for identifying histologic acute tubular injury and 49% of donors with severe acute tubular injury did not have AKI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of change in Scr concentration for diagnosing severe acute tubular injury was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.49-0.67) and for any acute tubular injury was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.45-0.58). Compared with Scr concentration, NGAL concentration demonstrated higher AUROC for diagnosing both severe acute tubular injury (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.74; P=0.03) and any acute tubular injury (0.60; 95% CI, 0.55-0.66; P=0.005). In donors who did not have Scr-based AKI, NGAL concentrations were higher with increasing severities of acute tubular injury (subclinical AKI). However, compared with Scr concentration, AUROCs for acute tubular injury diagnosis were not significantly higher for urinary L-FABP, IL-18, or KIM-1.The spectrum of AKI cause in deceased donors may be different from that of a general hospitalized population.Concentrations of Scr and kidney injury biomarkers (L-FABP, IL-18, and KIM-1) lack accuracy for diagnosing acute tubular injury in hospitalized deceased donors. Although urinary NGAL concentration had slightly higher discrimination for acute tubular injury than did Scr concentration, its overall AUROC was still modest.

Project description:BackgroundCreatinine is widely used to estimate renal function, but this is not practical in critical illness. Low creatinine has been associated with mortality in many clinical settings. However, the associations between predialysis creatinine level, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, fluid overload, and mortality in acute kidney injury patients receiving dialysis therapy (AKI-D) has not been fully addressed.MethodsWe extracted data for AKI-D patients in the eICU and MIMIC databases. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the eICU dataset. The study cohort was divided into the high-creatine group and the low-creatinine group by the median value (4 mg/dL). The baseline patient information included demographic data, laboratory tests, medications, and comorbid conditions. The independent association of creatinine level with 30-day mortality was examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. In sensitivity analyses, the associations between creatinine, SOFA score, and mortality were analyzed in patients with or without fluid overload. We also carried out an external validity using the MIMIC dataset.ResultsIn all 1,600 eICU participants, the 30-day mortality rate was 34.2%. The crude overall mortality rate in the low-creatinine group (44.9%) was significantly higher than that in the high-creatinine group (21.9%; P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted models, the low-creatinine group was associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.42; P < 0.001) compared with the high-creatinine group. The low-creatinine group had higher SOFA and nonrenal SOFA scores. In sensitivity analyses, the low-creatinine group had a higher 30-day mortality rate with regard to the BMI or albumin level. Fluid overloaded patients were associated with a significantly worse survival in the low-creatinine group. The results were consistent when assessing the external validity using the MIMIC dataset.ConclusionsIn patients with AKI-D, lower predialysis creatinine was associated with increased mortality risk. Moreover, the mortality rate was substantially higher in patients with lower predialysis creatinine with concomitant elevation of fluid overload status.

Project description:BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious condition encountered in hospitalized patients. The severity of kidney injury is defined by the RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO criteria which attempt to establish the degree of renal impairment. The KDIGO guidelines state that the creatinine clearance should be measured whenever possible in AKI and that the serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance remain the best clinical indicators of renal function. Neither the RIFLE, AKIN, nor KDIGO criteria estimate actual creatinine clearance. Furthermore there are no accepted methods for accurately estimating creatinine clearance (K) in AKI.Study designThe present study describes a unique method for estimating K in AKI using urine creatinine excretion over an established time interval (E), an estimate of creatinine production over the same time interval (P), and the estimated static glomerular filtration rate (sGFR), at time zero, utilizing the CKD-EPI formula. Using these variables estimated creatinine clearance (Ke)=E/P * sGFR.Setting and participantsThe method was tested for validity using simulated patients where actual creatinine clearance (Ka) was compared to Ke in several patients, both male and female, and of various ages, body weights, and degrees of renal impairment. These measurements were made at several serum creatinine concentrations in an attempt to determine the accuracy of this method in the non-steady state. In addition E/P and Ke was calculated in hospitalized patients, with AKI, and seen in nephrology consultation by the author. In these patients the accuracy of the method was determined by looking at the following metrics; E/P>1, E/P<1, E=P in an attempt to predict progressive azotemia, recovering azotemia, or stabilization in the level of azotemia respectively. In addition it was determined whether Ke<10 ml/min agreed with Ka and whether patients with AKI on renal replacement therapy could safely terminate dialysis if Ke was greater than 5 ml/min.Outcomes and resultsIn the simulated patients there were 96 measurements in six different patients where Ka was compared to Ke. The estimated proportion of Ke within 30% of Ka was 0.907 with 95% exact binomial proportion confidence limits. The predictive accuracy of E/P in the study patients was also reported as a proportion and the associated 95% confidence limits: 0.848 (0.800, 0.896) for E/P<1; 0.939 (0.904, 0.974) for E/P>1 and 0.907 (0.841, 0.973) for 0.9<E/P<1.1. Ke<10 ml/min correlated very well with Ka, while Ke>5 ml/min accurately predicted the ability to terminate renal replacement therapy in AKI.LimitationsInclude the need to measure urine volume accurately. Furthermore the precision of the method requires accurate estimates of sGFR, while a reasonable measure of P is crucial to estimating Ke.ConclusionsThe present study provides the practitioner with a new tool to estimate real time K in AKI with enough precision to predict the severity of the renal injury, including progression, stabilization, or improvement in azotemia. It is the author's belief that this simple method improves on RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO for estimating the degree of renal impairment in AKI and allows a more accurate estimate of K in AKI.

Dataset Information

Choice of Reference Creatinine for Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis.

Publications

Choice of Reference Creatinine for Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets