Dataset Information

Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

ABSTRACT: We assessed the clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses using a meta-analysis of diagnostic test. We performed a comprehensive online search in the following database including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from the inception to August 25, 2019. the following index were calculated for assessing the diagnostic ability, including sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Seventeen studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses. The overall sensitivity was 0.93 with 95% CI of 0.88-0.95. The specificity was 0.71 and the 95% CI was 0.60-0.80. The pooled AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93). The diagnostic odds ratio was 31 (95% CI: 21-45). The NLR and PLR were 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07-0.15) and 3.2(95% CI: 2.3-4.4), respectively. There is a slight heterogeneity within studies. The subgroup analysis was also performed. For retrospective and perspective, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.93, 0.92 and 0.71, 0.73; For different diameter lesions, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.93, 0.94 and 0.64, 0.74; For sample size (?median vs. >median), the sensitivity and specificity were 0.94, 0.93 and 0.67, 0.77. The Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test in indicated no publication bias. The CEUS have a high diagnostic ability in differentiating benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

SUBMITTER: Shen L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6912038 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

Shen Lin L Li Yanyan Y Li Na N Zhao Yajie Y Zhou Qin Q Li Zhanzhan Z

Cancer medicine 20191023 18

We assessed the clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses using a meta-analysis of diagnostic test. We performed a comprehensive online search in the following database including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from the inception to August 25, 2019. the following index were calculated for assessing the diagnostic ability, including sensitivity, specificity, diagno ...[more]

PMID: 31642189

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPleural disease is a prevalent condition. As precision therapy advances, noninvasive imaging modalities play even more important roles in the evaluation of pleural diseases. This study investigated the diagnostic capabilities of high-frequency B-mode ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in terms of differentiating between benign and malignant pleural diseases.MethodsPatients with unexplained thickened pleurae were prospectively analyzed via transthoracic US. High-frequency B-mode US was used to derive the pleural thickness, morphology, and echogenicity. We analyzed the high-frequency CEUS data including the enhancement mode and time intensity curve (TIC). The cause of pleural thickening was confirmed by pleural biopsy and follow-up after the biopsy. We analyzed the differences in various ultrasonic features between the malignant and benign groups. Moreover, we plotted receiver operator curves (ROCs) and obtained the area under the curves, sensitivities, and specificities of all significant continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the combined usefulness of multiple US indicators in terms of predicting malignant pleurae.ResultsThirty malignant and twenty benign thickened pleurae were finally diagnosed via pleural biopsy and at least six months of follow-up. The pleural morphology and enhancement modes significantly differed between the two groups (all P<0.05). The thickness derived from B-mode US and CEUS were significantly thicker in the malignant group (both P<0.05). Arrival time (AT) and the time to peak (TTP) of TIC were significantly shorter in the malignant group, whereas peak intensity and the area under the TIC were significantly higher in the malignant group (all P<0.05). The area under the ROC for pleural thickness derived from B-mode US was 0.819; pleural thickness derived from CEUS was 0.848; AT was 0.804; TTP was 0.750; peak intensity was 0.745; the area under the TIC was 0.743; and the combined various B-mode and CEUS parameter was 0.975.ConclusionsPleural thickness, morphology, enhancement mode, and the TIC of high-frequency US aided the differentiation of benign from malignant pleural diseases. Combined analysis of US indicators further improved the diagnostic capability.

Project description:ObjectivesTo assess the value of conventional, Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) (conventional ultrasonography (US), Doppler US and CEUS) for diagnosing ovarian cancer.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were conducted for studies published until October 2021.Eligibility criteriaStudies assessed the diagnostic value of conventional US, Doppler US or CEUS for detecting ovarian cancer, with no restrictions placed on published language and status.Data extraction and synthesisThe study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent authors. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR), diagnostic OR (DOR) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were pooled using the bivariate generalised linear mixed model and random effects model.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 72 studies and involved 9296 women who presented with ovarian masses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC for conventional US were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87 to 0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.91), 6.87 (95% CI: 4.98 to 9.49) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.15), 57.52 (95% CI: 36.64 to 90.28) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.97), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC for Doppler US were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91 to 0.95) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.89), 6.10 (95% CI: 4.59 to 8.11) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.11), 61.76 (95% CI: 39.99 to 95.37) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.97), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC for CEUS were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.95), 11.47 (95% CI: 6.52 to 20.17) and 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.09), 152.11 (95% CI: 77.77 to 297.51) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97 to 0.99), respectively. Moreover, the AUC values for conventional US (p=0.002) and Doppler US (p=0.005) were inferior to those of CEUS.ConclusionsConventional US, Doppler US and CEUS have a relatively high differential diagnostic value for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. The diagnostic performance of CEUS was superior to that of conventional US and Doppler US.

Dataset Information

Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

Publications

Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets