Dataset Information

Dietary antioxidative supplements and diabetic retinopathy; a systematic review.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:There is controversial data regarding the effects of dietary antioxidative supplements on diabetic retinopathy (DR). We conducted a systematic review of both observational and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to clarify whether they are effective or not. Methods:All observational and RCTs conducted by antioxidative supplements on DR published up to 1 January 2018 in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were included. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, and studies conducted in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), children or pregnant women. Main outcome measures were reporting the incidence or progression of DR in T2DM by assessment of visual fields, and measurements of oxidative and antioxidative biomarkers. The quality of reporting of included articles and risk of bias were assessed. Results:Finally, we reached 14 observational studies and 7 RCTs that conducted on 256,259 subjects. Due to severe methodological heterogeneity, only qualitative synthesis was carried. All studies were reported a significantly lower level of antioxidants and higher level of oxidative stress biomarkers in DR compared with others. There was an inverse significant correlation between vitamin C and malondialdehyde (MDA) (r?=?-0.81) or DNA damage (r?=?-0.41). These figures were statistically significant between vitamin E and MDA (r?=?0.77) or superoxide dismutase (r?=?0.44). Coefficient of correlation between MDA and zinc (-0.82), coenzyme Q10 (0.56), and magnesium (-0.73) was significant. Multi-oxidants trials were shown non-significant beneficial effects on DR. Conclusions:Although our study supports the positive effects of antioxidative supplements on DR, more high quality studies are needed to confirm.

SUBMITTER: Tabatabaei-Malazy O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6915253 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Dietary antioxidative supplements and diabetic retinopathy; a systematic review.

Tabatabaei-Malazy Ozra O Ardeshirlarijani Edris E Namazi Nazli N Nikfar Shekoufeh S Jalili Reza Baradar RB Larijani Bagher B

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders 20190830 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>There is controversial data regarding the effects of dietary antioxidative supplements on diabetic retinopathy (DR). We conducted a systematic review of both observational and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to clarify whether they are effective or not.<h4>Methods</h4>All observational and RCTs conducted by antioxidative supplements on DR published up to 1 January 2018 in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were included. Exclusion criteria ...[more]

PMID: 31890694

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a common microvascular complication in diabetic patients and is considered the main cause of visual loss worldwide. Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition, which compromises dental supporting tissues. The chronic bacterial challenge in periodontitis is a persistent source of inflammatory mediators that may be associated with insulin resistance, increasing the risk of complications of diabetes mellitus. This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence in the association between diabetic retinopathy and periodontitis. Methods: This review was registered under the number CRD 42019142267. A search strategy in five electronic databases and a gray literature source was performed based on the PECO acronym. After data extraction, the qualitative synthesis and risk of bias analyses were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The level of evidence of all studies taken together was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Out of the 253 citations screened, five cross-sectional studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis, in which two were judged to be of good quality, one as fair quality, and two as poor quality. Among the included studies, a significant relationship between the severity of periodontitis (CAL > 5 mm) and the severity of diabetic retinopathy (p < 0.05) was reported by four studies. Also, an association between both diseases in non-obese adults was found after adjustments [OR 2.206 (1.114-4.366); p = 0.0232). However, the analysis of evidence by GRADE assessment was rated as low. Conclusions: Although the results of individual studies suggest an association between diabetic retinopathy and periodontitis, the quality of the body of evidence was judged to be low by the GRADE approach. Further studies with larger sample sizes, adequate models of cofounders' adjustments, and prospective analysis of periodontitis and diabetes conditions ought to be conducted to clarify this association.

Project description:BackgroundThe relationship between uric acid (UA) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains ambiguous, and the results of current studies on the UA levels in patients with DR are conflicting. A meta-analysis was performed to provide a better understanding of the relationship between UA levels and DR.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until December 11, 2021 to identify eligible studies, that compared the UA levels of the case group (patients with DR) and control group (controls with diabetes and healthy participants). The weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the difference in UA levels between the case and control groups.ResultsTwenty-one studies involving 4,340 patients with DR and 8,595 controls (8,029 controls with diabetes and 566 healthy participants) were included in this meta-analysis. We found that patients with DR had significantly higher UA levels than those in the controls with diabetes (WMD = 36.28; 95% CI: 15.68, 56.89; P < 0.001) and healthy participants (WMD = 70.80; 95% CI: 19.85, 121.75; P = 0.006). There was an obvious heterogeneity among the 21 studies (I 2 = 97%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of different phases of DR showed that UA levels were significantly increased in participants with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (WMD = 46.57; 95% CI: 28.51, 64.63; P < 0.001) than in controls with diabetes; however, the difference is not statistically significant when comparing UA levels in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and controls with diabetes (WMD = 22.50; 95% CI: -6.07, 51.08; P = 0.120). In addition, UA levels were higher in participants with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25.0 kg/m2 and over 15 years of diabetes. Univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that BMI (P = 0.007, Adj R 2 = 40.12%) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) (P = 0.040, Adj R 2 = 29.72%) contributed to between-study heterogeneity.ConclusionsIn conclusion, our study provides evidence that UA levels are higher in patients with DR than those in the controls, but this difference is not statistically significant in the early phases. UA might be a potential biomarker for identifying disease severity in patients with DR, rather than predicting the onset of DR among patients with diabetes. However, more prospective and high-quality clinical evidence is required to confirm these present findings.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=297708.

Dataset Information

Dietary antioxidative supplements and diabetic retinopathy; a systematic review.

Publications

Dietary antioxidative supplements and diabetic retinopathy; a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets