Open Reduction Internal Fixation of a Traumatic Osteochondral Lesion of the Patella With Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Nuelle CW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6926324 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundOpen reduction internal fixation (ORIF) has long been the conventional procedure for managing displaced patella fracture. This surgical approach has certain drawbacks, which might affect clinical outcomes and patient prognosis. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation (MIPF) was proposed to overcome these disadvantages. Few in-depth investigations have been performed to determine the superiority of MIPF over ORIF. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of MIPF and ORIF for patella fractures.MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies from November 26 to December 17, 2020. Non-English publications and pediatric orthopedic articles were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager, version 5.4, with mean differences (MDs), standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using a random effects model. The primary outcomes were the pain score, knee range of motion, and joint functionality. The secondary outcomes were the surgical time, complications, and implant removal rate.ResultsSix articles with a total of 304 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that patients with MIPF had a significantly reduced pain score (MD = - 1.30, 95% CI = - 1.77 to -0.82; p < 0.00001) and increased knee extension angles (MD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.18 to 1.25; p = 0.009) at 3-month follow-up. Furthermore, knee flexion angles (MD = 8.96, 95% CI = 5.81 to 12.1; p < 0.00001) and joint functionality (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.86; p = 0.001) had statistically improved at 2 years. However, no difference was observed between MIPF and ORIF with regard to the surgical time. The risk of complications (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.18; p < 0.00001) and implant removal rate (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.57; p = 0.003) were significantly lower with MIPF than with ORIF.ConclusionsMIPF is more favorable than ORIF in terms of the pain score, knee range of motion, joint functionality, complications, and implant removal rate. Thus, it can be adopted as an alternative to ORIF.
| S-EPMC8369684 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:It is still unknown whether bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws provide an advantage over titanium screws in the treatment of medial malleolar (MM) fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MM fractures fixed with either bioabsorbable Mg screws or conventional titanium screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A cohort of 48 patients with MM fractures who underwent compression screw fixation was retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; mean age: 37.9?±?17.7 years) were treated with bioabsorbable Mg screws, and 25 patients (14 male, 11 female; mean age: 45.0?±?15.7 years) were treated with conventional titanium screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year, with a mean time of 24.6?±?10.5 months (12-53 months). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the clinical results. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis grading was used to evaluate posttraumatic osteoarthritis on final ankle radiographs. Fracture union, rate of implant removal, and complications were recorded. Comparative analysis of two independent groups was performed using the chi-squared test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS:The two groups were comparable concerning demographic and clinical characteristics. Age (p?=?0.146), sex (p?=?0.252), side (p?=?0.190), MM fracture type (p?=?0.500), associated fractures (p?=?0.470), and follow-up period (p?=?0.903) were similar between the groups. At final follow-up examination, AOFAS score (p?=?0.191) was similar between groups. Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Grade of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, according to KL, was equally distributed in both groups (p?=?0.074). No deep infection or osteomyelitis was seen. Five patients in the titanium screw group underwent implant removal, due to pain in three of them and difficulty in wearing shoes in the other two (p?=?0.031). Implant removal was performed after a mean of 14.2?±?3.1 months (12-19 months). CONCLUSIONS:Bioabsorbable Mg and titanium screws had similar therapeutic efficacy in MM fracture fixation regarding functional and radiological outcomes. However, the rate of implant removal was higher with titanium screws. Bioabsorbable Mg screws may be a favorable fixation option since secondary implant removal procedures can be prevented. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Level IV, Retrospective case series.
| S-EPMC7248135 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of our study was to compare the curative effect of two surgical methods for Schatzker type I to III tibia plateau fractures, arthroscopy assisted reduction percutaneous internal fixation (ARIF) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), with the intent of evaluating the quality of evidence to assist treatment selection. Searches of PubMed, Cochrane and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing ARIF and ORIF regarding the following outcomes: functional outcomes, perioperative complications and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (MDs) were pooled using either a fixed-effects model or random-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the trials included in the analysis. 19 RCTs and one quasi-RCT provided the data from 1272 patients. ARIF was associated with better functional outcomes, a lower risk of perioperative complications, and lower risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. After consideration of the quality of evidence of the included studies, the advantages provided by ARIF are not substantive over ORIF for the treatment of Schatzker type I to III tibia plateau fractures, except reducing the risk of perioperative complications.
| S-EPMC6145938 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osteochondral injuries commonly occur after lateral patellar instability events. Recognition and early intervention of displaced fragments is key to maintaining the viability of the fragment and congruency of the articular surface. Multiple fixation techniques exist for achieving stable fixation of displaced osteochondral lesions, including metal or bioabsorbable screws and all suture techniques. In this Technical Note, we describe a technique for internal fixation of a displaced osteochondral fragment of the lateral femoral condyle using knotless suture anchors. This technique affords minimally invasive restoration of the native anatomy with excellent stability of the fracture fragment, allowing early range of motion and ambulation.
| S-EPMC8626706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Distal clavicle fractures are common, and no standard treatment exists. Many different surgical modalities exist. This report describes an open reduction internal fixation technique that achieves both plate and coracoclavicular stabilization using a button device. A precontoured superior-lateral plate is secured to the clavicle. A 3.2-mm spade-tipped drill bit is drilled across the clavicle and coracoid, passing through 4 cortices. The button is loaded onto an insertion device, passed across the 4 cortices, and captured on the undersurface of the coracoid under fluoroscopic guidance. This construct is linked to the distal clavicle plate by heavy sutures using a second button that sits in the plate. The lateral locking holes are then filled to finalize fixation. This technique provides for a simplified way to achieve coracoclavicular stabilization when using a plate for fixation of distal clavicle fractures.
| S-EPMC4246360 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction The ability to treat fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) has dramatically revolutionized the approach to mandible fracture. With OR/IF, the postoperative role of rigid maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) has declined, but it is used to maintain proper occlusion until internal fixation of the fracture is achieved. Objective To assess intraoperative manual MMF during OR/IF of selected cases of mandibular fractures. Methods This prospective study was conducted on 80 patients with isolated mandibular fractures managed by OR/IF using two titanium miniplates. The patients were classified into two groups: a control group (40 patients) treated by OR/IF after intraoperative rigid MMF followed by immediate MMF removal, and a study group (40 patients) treated by rigid MMF, which was replaced by temporary intraoperative manual MMF (3MF) until plate fixation. Results There were no significant differences of the postoperative complication and dental occlusion, although a highly significant reduction of operative time was achieved in the 3MF group. Patient who received the 3MF technique had statistically significantly better average intrinsic vertical mouth opening in the early postoperative period (1 week after surgery), and normal mouth opening could be achieved in all cases in both groups 8 weeks after surgery. Conclusions Intraoperative rigid MMF is not mandatory and can be replaced in selected cases of fracture mandible by manual maintenance of proper dental occlusion until hardware fixation, gaining the advantages of shorter operative time and less risk of blood-transmitted diseases to the surgical team and the patient in addition to the benefits of immediate postoperative mandible mobilization.
| S-EPMC4593909 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the effects between computer-assisted and traditional cannulated screw internal fixation on treating femoral neck fracture.MethodsThe search was conducted in Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database from the beginning to August 2020. RevMan5.4 software, which was provided by the International Cochrane Group, was used for the meta-analysis comparing the differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, fluoroscopy frequency, fracture healing time, total drilling times, Harris score, fracture healing rate, and femoral head necrosis rate between computer-assisted and traditional methods groups.ResultsA total of 1028 patients were included in 16 studies. Primary outcome indicators: Compared with the traditional method group, the computer-assisted group had less operative time (2RCTs, P < 0.00001; 8 non-RCTs, P = 0.009; Overall, P < 0.00001), intraoperative bleeding (1 RCTs, P < 0.00001; 9non-RCTs, P < 0.00001; Overall, P < 0.00001), femoral head necrosis rate (1 RCT, P = 0.11;7 non-RCTs, P = 0.09; Overall, P = 0.02) and higher Harris scores (1 RCT, P < 0.0001; 9 non-RCTs, P = 0.0002; Overall, P < 0.0001), and there were no significant differences in fracture healing rate between the two groups (5 non-RCTs, P = 0.17). Secondary outcomes indicators: The computer-assisted group had a lower frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy and total number of drills compared with the traditional method group, while there was no significant difference in fracture healing time.ConclusionCompared with the traditional hollow screw internal fixation on the treatment of femoral neck fracture, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can shorten the operation time and improve the operation efficiency and reduce the X-ray injury of medical staff and help patients obtain a better prognosis. Therefore, computer-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation is a better choice for the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Study registration PROSPERO registration number CRD42020214493.
| S-EPMC8607593 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries with increasing incidence, particularly in the aging population. Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures can be treated conservatively whereas surgical fixation is usually indicated in the cases of displaced fractures. Various surgical options have been used for treatment of these fractures. Good outcomes have been reported with use of the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS plate; Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) as the implant of choice. However many complications have been reported, including varus malalignment, excessive retroversion of the articular part of the humerus, penetration of screws, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Therefore, we have hypothesized that an inadequate intraoperative fluoroscopic assessment may be an important factor contributing to these complications. We have described a step-by-step intraoperative fluoroscopic setup, including the proposal of a plate and screw view, focusing on the accuracy of reduction and proper placement of the PHILOS plate to prevent the complications previously described.
| S-EPMC5621472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo compare the initial fixation strength of osteochondral fragment fixations using osteochondral plugs, bioabsorbable pins, and knotless suture anchors.MethodsEighteen fresh-frozen immature (6 month old) porcine knees were used. An osteochondral fragment, cut from the articular surface of the medial femoral condyle to achieve a thickness of 5 mm, was used to mimic the unstable osteochondral fragment. It was fixed using three techniques, including two osteochondral plugs (osteochondral plug group), four full-threaded poly l-lactic acid pins (bioabsorbable pin group), and three suture anchors with a 2-0 tape (suture anchor group). Tensile loads at displacements of 1 and 2 mm and ultimate failure load were measured at a cross-head speed of 100 mm/min, and the variables of the three groups were compared statistically using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's honestly significant difference test.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the tensile load to achieve 1-mm displacement. The load to achieve 2-mm displacement and the ultimate failure load were significantly greater in the suture anchor group than the osteochondral plug group and the bioabsorbable pin group.ConclusionsSingle-pull destructive testing of a fixed articular osteochondral fragment with the force perpendicular to the articular surface, demonstrated no statistical difference in the tensile load to achieve 1-mm displacement, but the load to achieve 2-mm displacement was significantly greater for the three suture anchor-interlocking 2-0 tape constructs than the dual osteochondral plug fixation and the four bioabsorbable pin fixation constructs. Additionally, the three suture anchor-interlocking 2-0 tape construct's mean single-pull failure load was greater than other two fixation procedures.Clinical relevanceTo achieve osteochondral fragment union, sufficient fixation strength is critical. However, the initial fixation strength of osteochondral plugs, bioabsorbable pins, and knotless suture anchors for unstable osteochondral lesions remains unclear.
| S-EPMC9042741 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundUnilateral pedicle screw fixation several advantages, including reduced trauma and low cost. However, its stability and safety have not been widely recognized. In this study, the biomechanical differences in the vertebral body and screw-rod system after unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation were compared using both the finite element model and calf lumbar model.MethodWe used the verified finite element model to establish unilateral and bilateral posterior lumbar surgery models. The biomechanical data of different parts of the models were recorded under different working states. Then, three calf lumbar models were selected to simulate different working states with the help of a universal testing machine and other instruments. Finally, the biomechanical data of the screw-rod system were obtained from a static strain test and analysis system.ResultsBy analyzing and comparing biomechanical data obtained using two different methods, this study found that unilateral pedicle screw fixation does not bring excessive loads to the lumbar spine and screw-rod system.ConclusionFrom the perspective of biomechanics, unilateral pedicle screw fixation is considered a safe and reliable implantation technique.
| S-EPMC9713276 | biostudies-literature