Dataset Information

The analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-articular injection versus intra-articular injection in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

As an essential component of multimodal analgesia approaches after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), local infiltration analgesia (LIA) can be classified into peri-articular injection (PAI) and intra-articular injection (IAI) according to administration techniques. Currently, there is no definite answer to the optimal choice between the two techniques. Our study aims to investigate analgesic efficacy and safety of PAI versus IAI in patients receiving simultaneous bilateral TKA.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2017 and finished in July 2018. Sixty patients eligible for simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomly assigned to receive PAI on one side and IAI on another. Primary outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at rest or during activity at 3?h, 6?h, 12?h, 24?h, 48?h, and 72?h following surgery. Secondary outcomes contained active or passive range of motion (ROM) at 1, 2, and 3?days after surgery, time to perform straight leg raise, wound drainage, operation time, and wound complications.

Results

Patients experienced lower NRS pain scores of the knee receiving PAI compared with that with PAI during the first 48?h after surgery. The largest difference of NRS pain score at rest occurred at 48?h (PAI: 0.68, 95%CI[0.37, 0.98]; IAI: 2.63, 95%CI [2.16, 3.09]; P ConclusionPAI had the superior performance of pain relief and improvement of range of motion to IAI. Therefore, the administration technique of peri-articular injection is recommended when performing local infiltration analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR1800020420 on 29th December, 2018.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic Level I.

SUBMITTER: Cheng KY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6942284 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-articular injection versus intra-articular injection in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Cheng Kai-Yuan KY Feng Bin B Peng Hui-Ming HM Bian Yan-Yan YY Zhang Lin-Jie LJ Han Chang C Qiu Gui-Xing GX Weng Xisheng X

BMC anesthesiology 20200104 1

<h4>Background</h4>As an essential component of multimodal analgesia approaches after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), local infiltration analgesia (LIA) can be classified into peri-articular injection (PAI) and intra-articular injection (IAI) according to administration techniques. Currently, there is no definite answer to the optimal choice between the two techniques. Our study aims to investigate analgesic efficacy and safety of PAI versus IAI in patients receiving simultaneous bilateral TKA.<h ...[more]

PMID: 31901229

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA combined intravenous and intra-articular regimen is one of the most effective administration routes of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce perioperative blood loss in unilateral total knee arthroplasty. However, there have been few reports regarding use of the combined regimen for patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, in which blood-management strategy is more challenging.MethodsWe compared perioperative blood loss in 30 consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty who received both 1,000 mg of TXA intravenously and 1,000 mg of intra-articular TXA in each knee (combined TXA group) with that in a consecutive series of 51 patients who only received 1,000 mg of TXA intravenously (intravenous TXA group). Additional intravenous TXA was administered 6 hours after the initial administration in both groups. Except for the intraoperative TXA administration regimen, an identical perioperative blood-management strategy was applied to both groups; this consisted of transfusion of 800 or 400 mL of predeposited autologous blood except for patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level of <11.0 g/dL, who received 4 units of allogenic blood. All surgical procedures were performed with spinal anesthesia and without use of a pneumatic tourniquet. Perioperative blood loss was calculated using the blood volume and change in hemoglobin level from the preoperative measurement to postoperative day 3.ResultsThere was significantly less perioperative blood loss in the combined TXA group compared with the intravenous TXA group (mean and standard deviation, 1,201 ± 347 versus 1,638 ± 400 mL, respectively; mean difference, 437 mL; 95% confidence interval, 263 to 613 mL; p < 0.0001). No patient in the combined TXA group and 1 patient (2%) in the intravenous TXA group required additional allogenic blood transfusion. No thrombotic events occurred in either group.ConclusionsIn a nonrandomized comparison, combined intra-articular and intravenous TXA significantly reduced the calculated perioperative blood loss in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty compared with that found in patients treated only with intravenous TXA.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dataset Information

The analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-articular injection versus intra-articular injection in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Trial registration

Level of evidence

Publications

The analgesic efficacy and safety of peri-articular injection versus intra-articular injection in one-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets