Dataset Information

Efficacy and Systemic Absorption of Peri-articular Versus Intra-articular Administration of Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is widely accepted as an effective method for reducing blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As different routes of local TXA administration have been proposed to minimize systemic complications, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness and systemic absorption of peri-articular (PA) and intra-articular (IA) administration of TXA after primary TKA.

Methods

In a randomized controlled trial of patients scheduled for unilateral primary TKA, 108 were assigned to receive PA-TXA (15 mg/kg), IA-TXA (2 g), or no TXA injection. We assessed total blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and hemoglobin level changes 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative serum TXA levels, complications, and clinical symptoms of venous thromboembolism events were also evaluated.

Results

Total blood loss, hemoglobin level decreases, and blood transfusion rates in both TXA groups were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .05), without significant differences between PA and IA groups 48 hours after surgery. Serum TXA levels in the IA group were significantly higher than those in the PA cohort at 2 hours (28.2 mg/L vs 15.6 mg/L, P < .01) and 24 hours (4.4 mg/L vs 1.7 mg/L, P < .01) postoperatively. No wound complications were found in both TXA groups, but 14% of the control group developed subcutaneous ecchymoses. No evidence of venous thromboembolism events was reported.

Conclusions

PA-TXA is an excellent alternative route of local TXA injection to decrease postoperative blood loss after TKA. PA-TXA demonstrated lower levels of postoperative serum TXA, which may be beneficial for high-risk patients.

SUBMITTER: Pinsornsak P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8358094 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA combined intravenous and intra-articular regimen is one of the most effective administration routes of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce perioperative blood loss in unilateral total knee arthroplasty. However, there have been few reports regarding use of the combined regimen for patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, in which blood-management strategy is more challenging.MethodsWe compared perioperative blood loss in 30 consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty who received both 1,000 mg of TXA intravenously and 1,000 mg of intra-articular TXA in each knee (combined TXA group) with that in a consecutive series of 51 patients who only received 1,000 mg of TXA intravenously (intravenous TXA group). Additional intravenous TXA was administered 6 hours after the initial administration in both groups. Except for the intraoperative TXA administration regimen, an identical perioperative blood-management strategy was applied to both groups; this consisted of transfusion of 800 or 400 mL of predeposited autologous blood except for patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level of <11.0 g/dL, who received 4 units of allogenic blood. All surgical procedures were performed with spinal anesthesia and without use of a pneumatic tourniquet. Perioperative blood loss was calculated using the blood volume and change in hemoglobin level from the preoperative measurement to postoperative day 3.ResultsThere was significantly less perioperative blood loss in the combined TXA group compared with the intravenous TXA group (mean and standard deviation, 1,201 ± 347 versus 1,638 ± 400 mL, respectively; mean difference, 437 mL; 95% confidence interval, 263 to 613 mL; p < 0.0001). No patient in the combined TXA group and 1 patient (2%) in the intravenous TXA group required additional allogenic blood transfusion. No thrombotic events occurred in either group.ConclusionsIn a nonrandomized comparison, combined intra-articular and intravenous TXA significantly reduced the calculated perioperative blood loss in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty compared with that found in patients treated only with intravenous TXA.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Project description:BackgroundAs an essential component of multimodal analgesia approaches after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), local infiltration analgesia (LIA) can be classified into peri-articular injection (PAI) and intra-articular injection (IAI) according to administration techniques. Currently, there is no definite answer to the optimal choice between the two techniques. Our study aims to investigate analgesic efficacy and safety of PAI versus IAI in patients receiving simultaneous bilateral TKA.MethodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted from February 2017 and finished in July 2018. Sixty patients eligible for simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomly assigned to receive PAI on one side and IAI on another. Primary outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at rest or during activity at 3?h, 6?h, 12?h, 24?h, 48?h, and 72?h following surgery. Secondary outcomes contained active or passive range of motion (ROM) at 1, 2, and 3?days after surgery, time to perform straight leg raise, wound drainage, operation time, and wound complications.ResultsPatients experienced lower NRS pain scores of the knee receiving PAI compared with that with PAI during the first 48?h after surgery. The largest difference of NRS pain score at rest occurred at 48?h (PAI: 0.68, 95%CI[0.37, 0.98]; IAI: 2.63, 95%CI [2.16, 3.09]; P <?0.001); and the largest difference of NRS pain score during activity also took place at 48?h (PAI: 2.46, 95%CI [2.07, 2.85]; IAI: 3.90, 95%CI [3.27, 4.52]; P =?0.001). PAI group had better results of range of motion and time to perform straight leg raise when compared with IAI group. There were no differences in operation time, wound drainage, and wound complication.ConclusionPAI had the superior performance of pain relief and improvement of range of motion to IAI. Therefore, the administration technique of peri-articular injection is recommended when performing local infiltration analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.Trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR1800020420 on 29th December, 2018.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Level I.