Dataset Information

Composite score analysis for unsupervised comparison and network visualization of metabolomics data.

ABSTRACT: Metabolomics-based approaches are becoming increasingly popular to interrogate the chemical basis for phenotypic differences in biological systems. Successful metabolomics studies employ multivariate data analysis to compare large and highly complex datasets. A primary tool for unsupervised statistical analyses, principal component analysis (PCA), relies on the selection of a subsection of a maximum of three components from a larger model to visually represent similarity. The use of only three principal components limits the comprehensiveness of the model and can mask discrimination between samples. We have developed a new statistical metric, the composite score (CS), as a univariate statistic that incorporates multiple principal components to calculate a correlation matrix that enables quantitative comparisons of sample similarity between samples within one dataset based upon measured metabolome profiles. Composite score values were tabulated using profiles of complex extracts of dietary supplements from the plant Hydrastis canadensis (goldenseal) as a case study. Several outliers were unambiguously identified, and a PCA composite score network was developed to provide a graphical representation of the composite score matrix. Comparison with visualization using PCA score plots or dendrograms from hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) demonstrates the utility of the composite score to as a tool for metabolomics studies that seek to quantify similarity among samples. An R-script for the calculation of composite score has been made available.

SUBMITTER: Kellogg JJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6948848 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Composite score analysis for unsupervised comparison and network visualization of metabolomics data.

Kellogg Joshua J JJ Kvalheim Olav M OM Cech Nadja B NB

Analytica chimica acta 20191016

Metabolomics-based approaches are becoming increasingly popular to interrogate the chemical basis for phenotypic differences in biological systems. Successful metabolomics studies employ multivariate data analysis to compare large and highly complex datasets. A primary tool for unsupervised statistical analyses, principal component analysis (PCA), relies on the selection of a subsection of a maximum of three components from a larger model to visually represent similarity. The use of only three p ...[more]

PMID: 31864629

Similar Datasets

Project description:Membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults. It is characterized by the thickening of the glomerular basement membrane in the renal tissue. The current diagnosis of MGN is based on renal biopsy and the detection of antibodies to the few podocyte antigens. Due to the limitations of the current diagnostic methods, including invasiveness and the lack of sensitivity of the current biomarkers, there is a requirement to identify more applicable biomarkers. The present study aimed to identify diagnostic metabolites that are involved in the development of the disease using topological features in the component‑reaction‑enzyme‑gene (CREG) network for MGN. Significant differential metabolites in MGN compared with healthy controls were identified using proton nuclear magnetic resonance and gas chromatography‑mass spectrometry techniques, and multivariate analysis. The CREG network for MGN was constructed, and metabolites with a high centrality and a striking fold‑change in patients, compared with healthy controls, were introduced as putative diagnostic biomarkers. In addition, a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network, which was based on proteins associated with MGN, was built and analyzed using PPI analysis methods, including molecular complex detection and ClueGene Ontology. A total of 26 metabolites were identified as hub nodes in the CREG network, 13 of which had salient centrality and fold‑changes: Dopamine, carnosine, fumarate, nicotinamide D‑ribonucleotide, adenosine monophosphate, pyridoxal, deoxyguanosine triphosphate, L‑citrulline, nicotinamide, phenylalanine, deoxyuridine, tryptamine and succinate. A total of 13 subnetworks were identified using PPI analysis. In total, two of the clusters contained seed proteins (phenylalanine‑4‑hydroxlylase and cystathionine γ‑lyase) that were associated with MGN based on the CREG network. The following biological processes associated with MGN were identified using gene ontology analysis: 'Pyrimidine‑containing compound biosynthetic process', 'purine ribonucleoside metabolic process', 'nucleoside catabolic process', 'ribonucleoside metabolic process' and 'aromatic amino acid family metabolic process'. The results of the present study may be helpful in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of MGN. However, validation is required in the future.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Bioinformatic tools for the enrichment of 'omics' datasets facilitate interpretation and understanding of data. To date few are suitable for metabolomics datasets. The main objective of this work is to give a critical overview, for the first time, of the performance of these tools. To that aim, datasets from metabolomic repositories were selected and enriched data were created. Both types of data were analysed with these tools and outputs were thoroughly examined. RESULTS:An exploratory multivariate analysis of the most used tools for the enrichment of metabolite sets, based on a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of Jaccard's distances, was performed and mirrored their diversity. Codes (identifiers) of the metabolites of the datasets were searched in different metabolite databases (HMDB, KEGG, PubChem, ChEBI, BioCyc/HumanCyc, LipidMAPS, ChemSpider, METLIN and Recon2). The databases that presented more identifiers of the metabolites of the dataset were PubChem, followed by METLIN and ChEBI. However, these databases had duplicated entries and might present false positives. The performance of over-representation analysis (ORA) tools, including BioCyc/HumanCyc, ConsensusPathDB, IMPaLA, MBRole, MetaboAnalyst, Metabox, MetExplore, MPEA, PathVisio and Reactome and the mapping tool KEGGREST, was examined. Results were mostly consistent among tools and between real and enriched data despite the variability of the tools. Nevertheless, a few controversial results such as differences in the total number of metabolites were also found. Disease-based enrichment analyses were also assessed, but they were not found to be accurate probably due to the fact that metabolite disease sets are not up-to-date and the difficulty of predicting diseases from a list of metabolites. CONCLUSIONS:We have extensively reviewed the state-of-the-art of the available range of tools for metabolomic datasets, the completeness of metabolite databases, the performance of ORA methods and disease-based analyses. Despite the variability of the tools, they provided consistent results independent of their analytic approach. However, more work on the completeness of metabolite and pathway databases is required, which strongly affects the accuracy of enrichment analyses. Improvements will be translated into more accurate and global insights of the metabolome.

Dataset Information

Composite score analysis for unsupervised comparison and network visualization of metabolomics data.

Publications

Composite score analysis for unsupervised comparison and network visualization of metabolomics data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure