Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Mendel and Darwin: untangling a persistent enigma.


ABSTRACT: Mendel and Darwin were contemporaries, with much overlap in their scientifically productive years. Available evidence shows that Mendel knew much about Darwin, whereas Darwin knew nothing of Mendel. Because of the fragmentary nature of this evidence, published inferences regarding Mendel's views on Darwinian evolution are contradictory and enigmatic, with claims ranging from enthusiastic acceptance to outright rejection. The objective of this review is to examine evidence from Mendel's published and private writings on evolution and Darwin, and the influence of the scientific environment in which he was immersed. Much of this evidence lies in Mendel's handwritten annotations in his copies of Darwin's books, which this review scrutinises in detail. Darwin's writings directly influenced Mendel's classic 1866 paper, and his letters to Nägeli. He commended and criticised Darwin on specific issues pertinent to his research, including the provisional hypothesis of pangenesis, the role of pollen in fertilisation, and the influence of "conditions of life" on heritable variation. In his final letter to Nägeli, Mendel proposed a Darwinian scenario for natural selection using the same German term for "struggle for existence" as in his copies of Darwin's books. His published and private scientific writings are entirely objective, devoid of polemics or religious allusions, and address evolutionary questions in a manner consistent with that of his scientific contemporaries. The image that emerges of Mendel is of a meticulous scientist who accepted the tenets of Darwinian evolution, while privately pinpointing aspects of Darwin's views of inheritance that were not supported by Mendel's own experiments.

SUBMITTER: Fairbanks DJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6972880 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Mendel and Darwin: untangling a persistent enigma.

Fairbanks Daniel J DJ  

Heredity 20191217 2


Mendel and Darwin were contemporaries, with much overlap in their scientifically productive years. Available evidence shows that Mendel knew much about Darwin, whereas Darwin knew nothing of Mendel. Because of the fragmentary nature of this evidence, published inferences regarding Mendel's views on Darwinian evolution are contradictory and enigmatic, with claims ranging from enthusiastic acceptance to outright rejection. The objective of this review is to examine evidence from Mendel's published  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8943104 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5763265 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1420686 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5478260 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11348560 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC29835 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5659730 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB20152 | ENA
| S-EPMC3673222 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4961897 | biostudies-literature