Dataset Information

Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Laparoscopic myomectomy can be difficult when fibroids are large and numerous. This may result in extensive intraoperative bleeding and the need for a conversion to a laparotomy. Medical pretreatment prior to surgery might reduce these risks by decreasing fibroid size and vascularization of the fibroid. We compared pretreatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to laparoscopic myomectomy on several intra- and postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS:We performed a non-inferiority double-blind randomized controlled trial in nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Women were randomized between daily oral UPA for 12 weeks and single placebo injection or single intramuscular injection with leuprolide acetate and daily placebo tablets for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss. Secondary outcomes were reduction of fibroid volume, suturing time, total surgery time and surgical ease. RESULTS:Thirty women received UPA and 25 women leuprolide acetate. Non-inferiority of UPA regarding intraoperative blood loss was not demonstrated. When pretreated with UPA, median intraoperative blood loss was statistically significantly higher (525 mL [348-1025] vs 280 mL[100-500]; P = 0.011) and suturing time of the first fibroid was statistically significantly longer (40 minutes [28-48] vs 22 minutes [14-33]; P = 0.003) compared with GnRHa. Pretreatment with UPA showed smaller reduction in fibroid volume preoperatively compared with GnRHa (-7.2% [-35.5 to 54.1] vs -38.4% [-71.5 to -19.3]; P = 0.001). Laparoscopic myomectomies in women pretreated with UPA were subjectively judged more difficult than in women pretreated with GnRHa. CONCLUSIONS:Non-inferiority of UPA in terms of intraoperative blood loss could not be established, possibly due to the preliminary termination of the study. Pretreatment with GnRHa was more favorable than UPA in terms of fibroid volume reduction, intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop directly postoperatively, suturing time of the first fibroid and several subjective surgical ease parameters.

SUBMITTER: de Milliano I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6973004 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

de Milliano Inge I Huirne Judith A F JAF Thurkow Andreas L AL Radder Celine C Bongers Marlies Y MY van Vliet Huib H van de Lande Jonas J van de Ven Peter M PM Hehenkamp Wouter J K WJK

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 20190927 1

<h4>Introduction</h4>Laparoscopic myomectomy can be difficult when fibroids are large and numerous. This may result in extensive intraoperative bleeding and the need for a conversion to a laparotomy. Medical pretreatment prior to surgery might reduce these risks by decreasing fibroid size and vascularization of the fibroid. We compared pretreatment with ulipristal acetate (UPA) vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) prior to laparoscopic myomectomy on several intra- and postoperative ...[more]

PMID: 31468503

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMyomectomy has potential risks of complications. To reduce these risks, medical pre-treatment can be applied to reduce fibroid size and thereby potentially decrease intra-operative blood loss, the need for blood transfusion and emergency hysterectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the effectiveness of medical pre-treatment with Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or ulipristal acetate prior to laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy on intra-operative and post-operative outcomes.MethodsWe performed an extensive search in Embase.com, Wiley/Cochrane Library and PubMed in accordance with the Prisma guidelines. All studies published as full papers in peer reviewed journals using GnRHa or ulipristal acetate as medical pre-treatment independent of route of administration or dosage before laparotomic or laparoscopic myomectomy were included. The primary outcome was duration of surgery. Secondary outcomes were duration of enucleation, blood loss, degree of difficulty of surgery, identification of cleavage planes, proportion of vertical incisions, conversion rate, frequency of blood transfusions, post-operative complications, duration of hospital stay, frequency of recurrence of fibroids, frequency of uterine adhesions, recovery time and quality of life. No language restrictions were applied. Meta-analysis were performed where possible.FindingsTwenty-three studies were included. In laparotomic myomectomy, pre-treatment with GnRHa decreases intra-operative blood loss with 97.39ml (95% CI -111.80 to -82.97) compared to no pre-treatment or placebo. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomies also shows a reduction in intra-operative blood loss by 23.03ml (95% CI -40.79 to -5.27) and in the frequency of blood transfusions (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.55) compared to no pre-treatment. Only two retrospective cohort studies reported on pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate compared to no pre-treatment before laparoscopic myomectomy showing a statistically significant reduction in intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery and frequency of blood transfusions after pre-treatment with ulipristal acetate.ConclusionAdministration of GnRHa prior to laparotomic myomectomy reduces blood loss and might decrease uterine adhesion formation. Pre-treatment with GnRHa before laparoscopic myomectomy reduces blood loss, the frequency of blood transfusions and might increase recurrence rate of fibroids, however it should be taken into account that some results are mainly based on cohort studies. Other pre-treatment agent ulipristal acetate has not been investigated sufficiently for relevant surgical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundHeavy menstrual bleeding affects one in four women and negatively impacts quality of life. Ulipristal acetate is prescribed to treat symptoms associated with uterine fibroids. We compared the effectiveness of ulipristal acetate and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system at reducing the burden of heavy menstrual bleeding, irrespective of the presence of fibroids.MethodsThis randomised, open-label, parallel group phase III trial enrolled women over 18 years with heavy menstrual bleeding from 10 UK hospitals. Participants were centrally randomised, in a 1:1 ratio, to either three, 12-week treatment cycles of 5 mg ulipristal acetate daily, separated by 4-week treatment-free intervals, or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The primary outcome, analysed by intention-to-treat, was quality of life measured by the Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included menstrual bleeding and liver function. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 20426843.FindingsBetween June 5th, 2015 and February 26th, 2020, 236 women were randomised, either side of a recruitment suspension due to concerns of ulipristal acetate hepatoxicity. Subsequent withdrawal of ulipristal acetate led to early cessation of recruitment but the trial continued in follow-up. The primary outcome substantially improved in both groups, and was 89, (interquartile range [IQR] 65 to 100, n = 53) and 94, (IQR 70 to 100, n = 50; adjusted odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.17; p = 0.12) in the ulipristal and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system groups. Rates of amenorrhoea at 12 months were higher in those allocated ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (64% versus 25%, adjusted odds ratio 7.12, 95% CI 2.29-22.2). Other outcomes were similar between the two groups and there were no cases of endometrial malignancy or hepatotoxicity due to ulipristal acetate use.InterpretationOur findings suggested that both treatments improved quality of life. Ulipristal was more effective at inducing amenorrhoea. Ulipristal has been demonstrated to be an effective medical therapeutic option but currently its use has restrictions and requires liver function monitoring.FundingUK Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research EME Programme (12/206/52).

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess efficacy and tolerability of ulipristal acetate, a selective progesterone receptor modulator, for treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.MethodsThis phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled premenopausal women (aged 18-50 years) with abnormal uterine bleeding, one or more discrete leiomyomas, and uterine size 20 weeks of gestation or less. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 5 mg ulipristal, 10 mg ulipristal, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks followed by 12-week drug-free follow-up. Coprimary endpoints were rate of and time to amenorrhea, defined as no bleeding for the last 35 consecutive days of treatment. Secondary endpoints included rates of amenorrhea from day 11 and change from baseline to endpoint in the Revised Activities subscale of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, which includes questions pertaining to physical and social activities. Safety assessments included adverse event monitoring and endometrial biopsies. A sample size of 150 was planned to compare separately each dose of ulipristal with placebo.ResultsFrom March 2014 to March 2016, 157 patients were randomized. Demographics were similar across treatment groups. Amenorrhea was achieved by 25 of 53 (47.2% [97.5% CI 31.6-63.2]) and 28 of 48 (58.3% [97.5% CI 41.2-74.1]) patients treated with 5 mg and 10 mg ulipristal, respectively, compared with 1 of 56 (1.8% [97.5% CI 0.0-10.9]) placebo-treated patients (both P<.001). Time to amenorrhea was shorter for both ulipristal doses compared with placebo (P<.001), and both doses of ulipristal resulted in improved quality of life compared with placebo (P<.001). Common adverse events (5% or greater in either ulipristal group during treatment) were hypertension, elevated blood creatinine phosphokinase, and hot flushes. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients, but none was considered related to treatment. Endometrial biopsies were benign.ConclusionUlipristal at 5 mg and 10 mg were well tolerated and superior to placebo in rate of and time to amenorrhea in women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02147197.

Project description:ObjectivesTo assess pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic outcomes of a novel copper (Cu) intrauterine system (IUS) releasing ulipristal acetate (UPA) in healthy women.Study designIn this single-blinded, randomized proof-of-concept study, ovulatory women received one of three Cu-IUSs releasing low-dose UPA (5, 20 or 40 µg/d) for 12 weeks. The study included a baseline cycle, three 4-week treatment-cycles and 2 recovery cycles. Primary outcomes included effects of the IUS on bleeding profile, ovarian function, and the occurrence of progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes (PAEC). Pharmacokinetics and safety profile were secondary outcomes. We compared outcomes in treatment-cycle 3 with baseline, using generalized linear mixed models with orthogonal contrasts.ResultsWe randomized 29 women (5 µg/d = 10, 20 µg/d = 10, 40 µg/d = 9). All had a successful IUS insertion; 27 completed the 12-week treatment period. Compared to baseline, the mean number of bleeding-only days at treatment-cycle 3 declined by 16.7% in the 5 µg/d group (3.6 vs 3.0, p = 0.66), 40.5% in the 20 µg/d group (4.2 vs 2.5, p = 0.14), and 77% in the 40 µg/d group (3.9 vs 0.9, p = 0.002). Most women reported reduction in the amount of bleeding: 4/8, 8/10, and 7/9 for the 5 µg/d, 20 µg/d, and 40 µg/d groups, respectively. During IUS use, ovulation occurred in most cycles [5 µg/d: 23/24 (96%), 20 µg/d: 26/30 (87%), 40 µg/d: 22/27 (81%)]. The frequency of PAEC at IUS removal was 1/10 (10%), 1/10 (10%) and 4/9 (44%) in the 5 µg/d, 20 µg/d, and 4 0 µg/d groups, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsReduction in bleeding, low incidence of PAEC, and no serious adverse events are reassuring findings of the novel Cu-UPA-IUS. The 20 µg/d seems the lowest dose promoting a favorable bleeding profile and limiting PAEC.ImplicationsThe preliminary results of this short-term study of a novel copper intrauterine system (IUS) delivering ulipristal acetate showed reduction of bleeding, low incidence of progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes, and absence of serious adverse events. By preventing copper-induced increase in bleeding, this IUS could provide a noncontraceptive benefit, especially for women with low hemoglobin.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether ulipristal acetate reduces the number of bleeding days in etonogestrel implant users in a 30-day period as compared with placebo. METHODS:We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible participants were women aged 18-45 years with an etonogestrel implant in place for greater than 90 days and less than 3 years who reported greater than one bleeding episode in a 24-day period. Enrolled participants were randomized to receive 15 mg ulipristal acetate compared with an identical-appearing placebo daily for 7 days. Participants completed daily bleeding diaries using automated text messaging to evaluate whether ulipristal acetate reduces the number of bleeding days as compared with placebo. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction with bleeding and the effect of ulipristal acetate on ovulation status. A sample size of 52 per group (n=104) was planned, calculated with an effect size of a 30% reduction in bleeding days, SD of 10 days, and dropout of 15%. Our study was terminated early (N=65) as a result of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration hold, but power was sufficient for analysis. The effect of ulipristal acetate on ovulatory potential was evaluated in a subset with weekly serum progesterone. RESULTS:From May 2017 to January 2018, 65 women were allocated to receive 15 mg ulipristal acetate (n=32) or placebo (n=33) daily for 7 days. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Women randomized to ulipristal acetate reported 5 fewer days of bleeding over a 30-day reference period after treatment (P=.002). At the conclusion of the 30-day follow-up period, women in the ulipristal acetate group were more satisfied with their bleeding profile than the placebo group (87.5% vs 60%, respectively; P<.001). Serum progesterone levels were nonovulatory in a subset of each group (placebo group range: less than 0.2-1.3 ng/mL; ulipristal acetate group range: less than 0.2-4.4 ng/mL). CONCLUSION:Ulipristal acetate is well-tolerated and reduced the number of bleeding days in etonogestrel implant users in our study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03118297.

Dataset Information

Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Publications

Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets