Dataset Information

Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.

ABSTRACT: Importance:Timely and complete disclosure of medical device defects is necessary to manage patient care safely and effectively. Objectives:To determine if the manufacturer's recommendations following the recall of a medical device were timely and complete, the follow-up information and data provided to patients and physicians were adequate for managing patient care, and the actions taken by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the recall were appropriate. Design, Setting, and Participants:This single-center retrospective case series included 90 of 448 patients who were implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker at the Minneapolis Heart Institute from May 2003 through January 2011; this pacemaker was recalled in November 2015. In addition, returned product reports submitted by the manufacturer to the FDA via the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from January 2008 through December 2018 were analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures:Clinical outcomes were serious adverse clinical events that occurred before and after the November 2015 recall notifying physicians and patients that the device's battery could fail unexpectedly because of high internal impedance. Technical outcomes were signs and causes of failure. Results:Five of 90 patients observed during 2015 experienced syncope when their pacemakers stopped pacing owing to battery or wire connection defects prior to the recall. Of the 90 patients, 37 (41%) were men, and the median (interquartile range) age at implantation was 71.3 (66.1-78.2) years. Analysis of the MAUDE data revealed that battery failures prior to the recall were associated with serious adverse events that included 1 death, 1 cardiac arrest, 5 syncopal attacks, and 6 heart failure exacerbations; 3 additional prerecall syncopal events were caused by wire connection defects. The manufacturer and the FDA were aware of the battery and wire connection defects for 19 months before issuing the recall, yet the wire connection problem was not included in the advisory and physicians were not informed that interrogating the pacemaker could result in loss of pacing. The FDA classified the recall as class II rather than the more critical class I. Conclusions and Relevance:This case series study of patients implanted with a defective pacemaker found that the pacemaker recall was delayed and that subsequent communications did not include all critical information needed for safe and effective patient care. These findings should prompt reforms in how the medical device industry and the FDA manage future medical device recalls.

SUBMITTER: Sengupta J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6990820 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.

Sengupta Jay J Storey Katelyn K Casey Susan S Trager Lena L Buescher Melissa M Horning Mark M Gornick Charles C Abdelhadi Raed R Tang Chuen C Brill Suzanne S Ashbach Laura L Hauser Robert G RG

JAMA internal medicine 20200201 2

<h4>Importance</h4>Timely and complete disclosure of medical device defects is necessary to manage patient care safely and effectively.<h4>Objectives</h4>To determine if the manufacturer's recommendations following the recall of a medical device were timely and complete, the follow-up information and data provided to patients and physicians were adequate for managing patient care, and the actions taken by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding the recall were appropriate.<h4>Design, ...[more]

PMID: 31860011

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThere are limited data examining the role of immune checkpoint (IC) ligands in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF). Therefore, we explore this in three HF animal models and in three different human cohorts (healthy, stable, and worsening HF).Methods and resultsTranscriptomic analyses of cardiac tissue of three different HF mouse models revealed differentially expressed IC receptors and their ligands compared with control mice. Based on this observation, serum levels of three well-known IC ligands (i.e. sPD-L1, sPD-L2 and galectin-9) were measured in stable HF patients from the Vitamin D Chronic Heart Failure (VitD-CHF) study (n = 101), as well as healthy individuals from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) study (n = 58). sPD-L1, sPD-L2, and galectin-9 were all associated with New York Heart Association classification. In multivariate linear regression analyses, all three IC ligands were associated with galectin-3 (β = 0.230, β = 0.283, and β = 0.304, respectively). sPD-L1 and galectin-9 were also associated with hs-troponin-T (β = 0.386 and β = 0.314). Regarding prognosis, higher serum levels of sPD-L1 and galectin-9 were significantly associated with increased risk for HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality [hazard ratio 1.69 (1.09-2.59) and hazard ratio 1.50 (1.06-2.12)]. Furthermore, the importance of IC ligands was tested in another stage of HF, namely worsening HF patients. In the worsening HF cohort (The BIOlogy Study to Tailored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure) (n = 2032), sPD-L2 and galectin-9 were associated with New York Heart Association classification and significantly predicted outcome with an increased relative risk of 15% and 20%, after multivariable adjustment, respectively.ConclusionsIC ligands are expressed in cardiac disease models, and serum levels of IC ligands are elevated in HF patients, are associated with disease severity, and significantly predict prognosis. These data indicate a potential role for IC ligands in HF pathogenesis.

Dataset Information

Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.

Publications

Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets