Dataset Information

Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The safety of pirfenidone on pulmonary fibrosis patients with other kinds of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Furthermore, its effectiveness-related factors on IPF patients are not quite explored. METHODS:A retrospective study, on patients prescribed pirfenidone for pulmonary fibrosis, was conducted to assess effectiveness on IPF patients and tolerability of all patients with lung fibrosis. The effectiveness of pirfenidone was tested on 110 IPF subjects receiving treatment for ?3 months by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Response-linked factors and progression-free survival (PFS) were also analyzed. The data about safety outcomes and drug dose adjustments were collected from all included subjects. RESULTS:A total of 176 subjects were included: 117 were IPF, 19 connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), and 40 unclassifiable ILD. Out of the 110 IPF subjects, 89 subjects were assessed as stable and 21 as progressive, out of which 10 died of acute exacerbation and 11 progressed. The effectiveness was significantly related to their baseline body mass index (BMI). IPF subjects with BMI>25kg/m2 or diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco)>30% had higher PFS rate. The most common adverse events were skin-related and gastrointestinal-related. Drug discontinuation owing to adverse events occurred similarly in these three groups. CONCLUSION:Pirfenidone was well tolerated in most of the lung fibrosis patients besides IPF, with a similar pattern of adverse events. Nearly 80% of IPF subjects were assessed as stable. More benefits were seen in IPF patients with higher BMI or mild-to-moderate disease.

SUBMITTER: Fang C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6992179 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice.

Fang Chuling C Huang Hui H Guo Jian J Ferianc Martin M Xu Zuojun Z

PloS one 20200130 1

<h4>Background</h4>The safety of pirfenidone on pulmonary fibrosis patients with other kinds of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Furthermore, its effectiveness-related factors on IPF patients are not quite explored.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective study, on patients prescribed pirfenidone for pulmonary fibrosis, was conducted to assess effectiveness on IPF patients and tolerability of all patients with lung fibrosis. The effectivenes ...[more]

PMID: 31999801

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Management of schizophrenia is sub-optimal in many patients. Targeting negative symptoms, among the most debilitating aspects of schizophrenia, together with positive symptoms, can result in significant functional benefits and dramatically improve quality of life for patients and their carers. Cariprazine, a partial agonist of the dopamine receptors D2/D3 has demonstrated effectiveness across symptom domains in clinical trials, particularly on negative symptoms. Objective To obtain a broader insight from clinicians with specific experience with cariprazine, on how it affects patient populations outside the clinical trial setting. Methods The panel addressed a series of psychopharmacologic topics not comprehensively addressed by the evidence-based literature, including characteristics of patients treated, dosing and switching strategies, duration of therapy, role of concomitant medications and tolerability as well as recommendations on how to individualize cariprazine treatment for patients with schizophrenia. Results Patients recommended for cariprazine treatment are those with first episodes of psychosis, predominant negative symptoms (maintenance/acute phase) and significant side effects (metabolic side effects, hyperprolactinemia, sedation) with other antipsychotics. When the long-term treatment of a lifetime illness is adequately weighted, cariprazine becomes one of the first-line medications, not only for patients with predominant negative symptoms but also for those with relatively severe positive symptoms, especially if they are at the first episodes and if a specific medication is added for symptoms such as agitation or insomnia. For instance, patients with agitation may also benefit from the combination of cariprazine and a benzodiazepine or another sedating agent. Cariprazine may be prescribed as add-on to medications such as clozapine, when that medication alone is ineffective for negative symptoms, and sometimes the first may be discontinued or its dose lowered, after a period of stability, leaving the patient on a better tolerated antipsychotic regimen. Conclusions Based on real-world clinical experience, the panel considered that cariprazine, with its distinct advantages including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, good efficacy and tolerability, represents a drug of choice in the long-term management of schizophrenia not only for patients with predominant negative symptoms but also for those with positive symptoms.

Project description:IntroductionPirfenidone is an oral antifibrotic agent approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Real-world data on adverse event (AE) management for pirfenidone are limited. Strategies for managing potential antifibrotic therapy AEs were examined in a sample of US pulmonologists.MethodsAn online, self-administered survey was fielded to pulmonologists between April 10 and May 17, 2017. Pulmonologists were included if they spent > 20% of their time in direct patient care and had ≥ 5 patients with IPF on antifibrotic therapy. Participants answered questions regarding initiation of pirfenidone, dose titration, and management of potential AEs.ResultsA total of 169 pulmonologists participated. Gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance was the most important factor in implementing alternative titration schedules for pirfenidone. Approximately three-quarters of pulmonologists recommended the standard titration scheme for starting treatment; however, a range of titration schedules up to 8 weeks were described, with a 4-week schedule being most common. Pulmonologists reported that most patients treated with alternative titration schedules could achieve the full dose of pirfenidone. Pulmonologists who were most effective at mitigating pirfenidone-related GI AEs by advising dosing at mealtimes more frequently recommended taking pirfenidone during a substantial meal than pulmonologists who were less effective. For photosensitivity AEs, pulmonologists recommended sunscreen use, sun avoidance, wearing a hat, and ultraviolet protection factor clothing.ConclusionsPulmonologists reported that alternative titration schedules for initiating pirfenidone were common and can aid in maintaining the full dose. Proposed strategies to ameliorate pirfenidone-related GI and photosensitivity AEs included taking pirfenidone during a substantial meal and minimizing sun exposure, respectively.FundingF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.

Project description:IntroductionIn this literature review we evaluated the real-world clinical effectiveness of switching Japanese diabetic patients from their current insulin regimen to insulin degludec (IDeg).MethodsStudies were identified from Japanese Diabetes Society (JDS) abstracts (2014-2015) and PubMed (2012 onwards). Inclusion criteria were: Japanese population, >15 participants, and studies switching patients from basal or basal-bolus insulin regimens to IDeg. Randomized controlled trials and case reports were excluded. Weighted mean changes in safety and effectiveness endpoints were calculated using the number of patients in each study.ResultsIn total, 81 JDS abstracts and seven manuscripts met the search criteria, representing 4238 patients [1028 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 602 with type 2 diabetes (T2D), 2608 with unspecified or mixed diabetes]. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was reported in 93% of studies, with an improvement in 84% of these (51% significant, 33% numerical), no change in 12%, and worsening in 4% (3% numerical, 1% significant). Across all studies, the weighted mean absolute change in HbA1c was -0.3% (-2.7 mmol/mol). Basal insulin dose was reported in 58% of studies and was lower in 60% of these (30% significant, 30% numerical), numerically unchanged in 26%, and higher in 14% (2% significant, 12% numerical). The weighted mean change in basal insulin dose was -4.8% and -3.0% for all studies and for studies with only significant results, respectively. The weighted mean change in basal dose based on all studies was -8.9, -5.5, and -2.9% for the T1D, T2D, and unspecified patient populations, respectively. Hypoglycemia was recorded in 31% of the studies. After switching treatment to IDeg, 55% of studies reported decreased hypoglycemia, 29% no change, and 16% an increase. Quality of life (QoL) was measured in 11% of studies, of which 82% reported improved QoL after switching, and 18% reported no change in QoL.ConclusionSwitching from a conventional basal insulin to IDeg has the potential to improve HbA1c with a lower insulin dose. Switching to IDeg may also provide a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improvement in QoL.FundingNovo Nordisk.

Dataset Information

Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice.

Publications

Real-world experiences: Efficacy and tolerability of pirfenidone in clinical practice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets