Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

ABSTRACT: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of voriconazole+anidulafungin (combination) or voriconazole+placebo (monotherapy) for invasive aspergillosis (IA; NCT00531479). We present a post hoc analysis of Korean and non-Korean patients with IA (including baseline positive serum galactomannan [GM]). Immunocompromised patients ? 16 years with IA were randomised 1:1, combination or monotherapy, for ? 2 weeks' treatment. The primary endpoint was 6- and 12-week all-cause mortality (Korean modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population). Overall, 454 patients enrolled (Koreans: 56 [combination: 28, monotherapy: 28], non-Koreans: 398 [combination: 200, monotherapy: 198]). The mITT population comprised 40 Koreans (combination: 23; monotherapy: 17) and 237 non-Koreans (combination: 112; monotherapy: 125). Week 6 treatment difference in mortality rate between combination and monotherapy was -6.4% in non-Koreans. This reduction was more marked in Koreans (-22.4%). Week 12 difference in all-cause mortality between combination and monotherapy was -17.7% (Koreans) and -20.2% at Week 6 (Koreans; positive baseline GM). Week 6 mortality (Koreans [mITT]; baseline GM >0.5-2.0) was 0/13 (combination) and 2/6 (monotherapy). Serious adverse events were numerically higher for combination than monotherapy (Koreans: 57.1%, 46.4%; non-Koreans: 49.5%, 46.0%). In Koreans, combination therapy was associated with marginally better outcomes than monotherapy and more so than in non-Koreans.

SUBMITTER: Lee DG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7003761 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Lee Dong-Gun DG Lee Hye-Jung HJ Yan Jean Li JL Lin Stephen Sheng-Fong SS Aram Jalal A JA

Mycoses 20190818 10

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of voriconazole+anidulafungin (combination) or voriconazole+placebo (monotherapy) for invasive aspergillosis (IA; NCT00531479). We present a post hoc analysis of Korean and non-Korean patients with IA (including baseline positive serum galactomannan [GM]). Immunocompromised patients ≥ 16 years with IA were randomised 1:1, combination or monotherapy, for ≥ 2 weeks' treatment. The primary endpoin ...[more]

PMID: 31355956

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:According to a recent randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin (VOR+ANI) with VOR monotherapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with hematologic disease or with hematopoietic stem cell transplant, mortality was lower after 6 weeks with VOR+ANI than with VOR monotherapy in a post hoc analysis of patients with galactomannan-based IA. The objective of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of VOR+ANI with VOR, from the perspective of hospitals in the Spanish National Health System. METHODS:An economic model with deterministic and probabilistic analyses was used to determine costs per life-year gained (LYG) for VOR+ANI versus VOR in patients with galactomannan-based IA. Mortality, adverse event rates, and life expectancy were obtained from clinical trial data. The costs (in 2015 euros [€]) of the drugs and the adverse event-related costs were obtained from Spanish sources. A Tornado plot and a Monte Carlo simulation (1,000 iterations) were used to assess uncertainty of all model variables. RESULTS:According to the deterministic analysis, for each patient treated with VOR+ANI compared with VOR monotherapy, there would be a total of 0.348 LYG (2.529 vs 2.181 years, respectively) at an incremental cost of €5,493 (€17,902 vs €12,409, respectively). Consequently, the additional cost per LYG with VOR+ANI compared with VOR would be €15,785. Deterministic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. In the probabilistic analysis, the cost per LYG with VOR+ANI was €15,774 (95% confidence interval: €15,763-16,692). The probability of VOR+ANI being cost-effective compared with VOR was estimated at 82.5% and 91.9%, based on local cost-effectiveness thresholds of €30,000 and €45,000, respectively. CONCLUSION:According to the present economic study, combination therapy with VOR+ANI is cost-effective as primary therapy of IA in galactomannan-positive patients in Spain who have hematologic disease or hematopoietic stem cell transplant, compared with VOR monotherapy.

Project description:Animal model systems are a critical component of the process of discovery and development of new antifungal agents for treatment and prevention of invasive aspergillosis. The persistently neutropenic rabbit model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) has been a highly predictive system in identifying new antifungal agents for treatment and prevention of this frequently lethal infection. Since its initial development, the persistently neutropenic rabbit model of IPA has established a strong preclinical foundation for dosages, drug disposition, pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy for deoxycholate amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex, amphotericin B colloidal dispersion, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole, and ibrexafungerp in treatment of patients with invasive aspergillosis. The findings of combination therapy with a mould-active triazole and an echinocandin in this rabbit model also predicted the outcome of the clinical trial for voriconazole plus anidulafungin for treatment of IPA. The plasma pharmacokinetic parameters and tissue disposition for most antifungal agents approximate those of humans in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Safety, particularly nephrotoxicity, has also been highly predictive in the rabbit model, as exemplified by the differential glomerular filtration rates observed in animals treated with deoxycholate amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B lipid complex, and amphotericin B colloidal dispersion. A panel of validated outcome variables measures therapeutic outcome in the rabbit model: residual fungal burden, markers of organism-mediated pulmonary injury (lung weights and infarct scores), survival, and serum biomarkers. In selected antifungal studies, thoracic computerized tomography (CT) is also used with diagnostic imaging algorithms to measure therapeutic response of pulmonary infiltrates, which exhibit characteristic radiographic patterns, including nodules and halo signs. Further strengthening the predictive properties of the model, therapeutic response to successfully developed antifungal agents for treatment of IPA has been demonstrated over the past two decades by biomarkers of serum galactomannan and (1→3)-β-D-glucan with patterns of resolution, that closely mirror those documented responses in patients with IPA. The decision to move from laboratory to clinical trials should be predicated upon a portfolio of complementary and mutually validating preclinical laboratory animal models studies. Other model systems, including those in mice, rats, and guinea pigs, are also valuable tools in developing clinical protocols. Meticulous preclinical investigation of a candidate antifungal compound in a robust series of complementary laboratory animal models will optimize study design, de-risk clinical trials, and ensure tangible benefit to our most vulnerable immunocompromised patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Project description:AimThe use of bevacizumab in combination therapy is an emerging trend in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. However, the clinical value of different combination types remains under debate. Thus, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bevacizumab-based combination therapy with monotherapy (therapy that uses one type of treatment, such as chemotherapy or surgery alone, to treat metastatic colorectal cancer) was performed, aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab-based combination therapy and to find a more beneficial combination.MethodsWe searched for clinical studies that evaluated bevacizumab-based combination therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. We extracted data from these studies to evaluate the relative risk (RR) of overall response rate (ORR) and grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), HRs of overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsEight RCTs were identified (n=3,424). Treatments included combinations of bevacizumab and oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4), combinations of bevacizumab and capecitabine and oxaliplatin, combinations of bevacizumab and fluorouracil/leucovorin, combinations of bevacizumab and irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (IFL), and combinations of bevacizumab and capecitabine. Bevacizumab-based combination therapy showed higher ORR (RR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.10–1.78; P=0.005), PFS (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55–0.73; P=0.000), and OS (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.73–0.92; P=0.001) values than monotherapy. However, higher grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.15–1.41; P=0.000) were observed in combination therapy than in monotherapy.ConclusionThis meta-analysis showed that the addition of IFL to bevacizumab better benefits PFS and safety. Adding FOLFOX4 was associated with better ORR and OS. The efficacy and safety of an IFL–bevacizumab–FOLFOX4 combination should be given greater weight in future clinical trials, guidelines, and clinical practice.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Publications

Efficacy and safety of combination antifungal therapy in Korean haematological patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets