Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Primary care interventions to address physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older: A meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:The best interventions to address frailty among older adults have not yet been fully defined, and the diversity of interventions and outcome measures makes this process challenging. Consequently, there is a lack of guidance for clinicians and researchers regarding which interventions are most likely to help older persons remain robust and independent. This paper uses meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of primary care interventions for physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60+ and provides an up-to-date synthesis of literature in this area. METHODS:PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and PEDro databases were searched, and RCTs, controlled pilot studies, or trials with similar study designs addressing frailty in the primary care setting among persons aged 60+ were chosen. Study data was abstracted following PRISMA guidelines, then meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. RESULTS:31 studies with a total of 4794 participants were analysed. Interventions using predominantly resistance-based exercise and nutrition supplementation seemed to improve frailty status versus control (RR = 0.62 (CI 0.48-0.79), I2 = 0%). Exercise plus nutrition education also reduced frailty (RR = 0.69 (CI 0.58-0.82), I2 = 0%). Exercise alone seemed effective in reducing frailty (RR = 0.63 (CI 0.47-0.84), I2 = 0%) and improving physical performance (RR = 0.43 (CI 0.18-0.67), I2 = 0%). Exercise alone also appeared superior to control in improving gait speed (SMD = 0.36 (CI 0.10-0.61, I2 = 74%), leg strength (SMD = 0.61 (CI 0.09-1.13), I2 = 87%), and grip strength (Mean Difference = 1.08 (CI 0.02-2.15), I2 = 71%) though a high degree of heterogeneity was observed. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (RR = 0.77 (CI 0.64-0.93), I2 = 0%) also seemed superior to control in reducing frailty. CONCLUSION:Exercise alone or with nutrition supplementation or education, and comprehensive geriatric assessment, may reduce physical frailty. Individual-level factors and health systems resource availability will likely determine configuration of future interventions.

SUBMITTER: Macdonald SH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7006935 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Primary care interventions to address physical frailty among community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older: A meta-analysis.

Macdonald Stephen H-F SH   Travers John J   Shé Éidín Ní ÉN   Bailey Jade J   Romero-Ortuno Roman R   Keyes Michael M   O'Shea Diarmuid D   Cooney Marie Therese MT  

PloS one 20200207 2


<h4>Introduction</h4>The best interventions to address frailty among older adults have not yet been fully defined, and the diversity of interventions and outcome measures makes this process challenging. Consequently, there is a lack of guidance for clinicians and researchers regarding which interventions are most likely to help older persons remain robust and independent. This paper uses meta-analysis to assess effectiveness of primary care interventions for physical frailty among community-dwel  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8001836 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3663706 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7557756 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5478427 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5679620 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6625582 | biostudies-literature