Dataset Information

Measuring and Reducing Chemical Spills by Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Providing Feedback.

ABSTRACT: The ability to handle chemicals safely is a key aspect of the learning development of students studying chemistry; however, there have been no previously reported investigations of the quantity of chemicals spilled by students during lab experiments. Therefore, the first part of this article reports the assessment of the volume of chemicals spilled by year 1 undergraduate chemistry students (n = 64) at a U.K. university during an existing chemical analysis practical designed to develop volumetric handling skills. The experiment was carried out on paper liners, allowing the areas of students' spills to be visible and quantified using calibrated spill volumes of liquid to determine the resultant spill area. The volume spilled by the student group was ca. 1.2% of that handled; however, the amount spilled by individual students ranged widely, from ca. 0.02% to ca. 10% of the volume handled. A feedback tool has been developed to allow laboratory demonstrators to rapidly quantify chemical spillage by individual students. This tool also provides the demonstrators with a framework to communicate the potential safety significance of the volume of chemical a student has spilled. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried out to examine the effect of providing feedback to students on their chemical spillage during a subsequent experiment. From a cohort of 185 year 1 undergraduate students, 150 consented to be randomized (81%), and data was collected for 144 students (96% of those randomized). A Hodges-Lehmann estimator for the median change in volume spilled during the second experiment due to providing feedback on spillage during first experiment was a 50% decrease in volume spilled (95% confidence range: 0 to 80% decrease, Mann-Whitney U test p = 0.05). The RCT was a waiting list trial, with all student receiving feedback either during or after the RCT, with blinded assessment by the demonstrators assessing volume spilled for the RCT.

SUBMITTER: Tsokou AM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7007193 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measuring and Reducing Chemical Spills by Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Providing Feedback.

Tsokou Aimilia M AM Howells Alix A Stark Moray S MS

Journal of chemical education 20190819 10

The ability to handle chemicals safely is a key aspect of the learning development of students studying chemistry; however, there have been no previously reported investigations of the quantity of chemicals spilled by students during lab experiments. Therefore, the first part of this article reports the assessment of the volume of chemicals spilled by year 1 undergraduate chemistry students (<i>n</i> = 64) at a U.K. university during an existing chemical analysis practical designed to develop vo ...[more]

PMID: 32051643

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is well known that some survey respondents reduce the effort they invest in answering questions by taking mental shortcuts - survey satisficing. This is a concern because such shortcuts can reduce the quality of responses and, potentially, the accuracy of survey estimates. This article explores "speeding," an extreme type of satisficing, which we define as answering so quickly that respondents could not have given much, if any, thought to their answers. To reduce speeding among online respondents we implemented an interactive prompting technique. When respondents answered faster than a minimal response time threshold, they received a message encouraging them to answer carefully and take their time. Across six web survey experiments, this prompting technique reduced speeding on subsequent questions compared to a no prompt control. Prompting slowed response times whether the speeding that triggered the prompt occurred early or late in the questionnaire, in the first or later waves of a longitudinal survey, among respondents recruited from non-probability or probability panels, or whether the prompt was delivered on only the first or on all speeding episodes. In addition to reducing speeding, the prompts increased response accuracy on simple arithmetic questions for a key subgroup. Prompting also reduced later straightlining in one experiment, suggesting the benefits may generalize to other types of mental shortcuts. Although the prompting could have annoyed respondents, it was not accompanied by a noticeable increase in breakoffs. As an alternative technique, respondents in one experiment were asked to explicitly commit to responding carefully. This global approach complemented the more local, interactive prompting technique on several measures. Taken together, these results suggest that interactive interventions of this sort may be useful for increasing respondents' conscientiousness in online questionnaires, even though these questionnaires are self-administered.

Project description:BackgroundPlacebos can reduce physical symptoms even when provided with full honesty and disclosure. Yet, the precise mechanisms underlying the effects of "open-label placebos" (OLPs) have remained subject of debate. Furthermore, it is unclear whether OLPs are similarly effective when provided remotely, as is sometimes required e.g. in the current COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsIn a randomized-controlled trial, we examined the effects of OLP plus treatment as usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone on symptom reduction in people with allergic rhinitis (N = 54) over the course of two weeks. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, OLP was provided remotely (i.e. sent via postal service). To investigate the potential influence of the clinical encounter on the effects of OLP, we manipulated the perception of the virtual clinical encounter, both with respect to verbal and nonverbal factors (augmented vs. limited encounter).ResultsThe results of the manipulation check confirmed that the augmented clinical encounter was evaluated more positively than the limited encounter, in terms of perceived warmth of the provider. Participants from all treatment groups showed significant symptom reduction from baseline to two weeks later, but OLP had no incremental effect over TAU. Participants benefitted more from OLP when they did not take any other medication against allergic symptoms than when taking medication on demand. When controlling for baseline symptoms, a significant treatment by encounter interaction was found, pointing to greater symptom improvement in the OLP group when the encounter was augmented, whereas the control group improved more when the encounter was limited.DiscussionThe study demonstrates that providing OLP and enhancing the encounter remotely is possible, but their effectiveness might be lower in comparison to previous studies relying on physical patient-provider interaction. The study raises questions for future research about the potential and challenges of remote placebo studies and virtual clinical encounters. The study has been registered as a clinical trial at ISRCTN (record number: 39018).

Dataset Information

Measuring and Reducing Chemical Spills by Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Providing Feedback.

Publications

Measuring and Reducing Chemical Spills by Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Providing Feedback.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets