Extending the Interval of Natalizumab Dosing: Is Efficacy Preserved?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Clerico M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7007494 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Extending the Interval of Natalizumab Dosing: Is Efficacy Preserved?
Clerico Marinella M De Mercanti Stefania Federica SF Signori Alessio A Iudicello Marco M Cordioli Cinzia C Signoriello Elisabetta E Lus Giacomo G Bonavita Simona S Lavorgna Luigi L Maniscalco Giorgia Teresa GT Curti Erica E Lorefice Lorena L Cocco Eleonora E Nociti Viviana V Mirabella Massimiliano M Baroncini Damiano D Mataluni Giorgia G Landi Doriana D Petruzzo Martina M Lanzillo Roberta R Gandoglia Ilaria I Laroni Alice A Frangiamore Rita R Sartori Arianna A Cavalla Paola P Costantini Gianfranco G Sormani Maria Pia MP Capra Ruggero R
Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics 20200101 1
Extending the natalizumab interval after the 24th administration could reduce the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The objective is to evaluate the noninferiority of the efficacy of an extended interval dosing (EID) compared with the standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab. It is an observational, multicenter (14 Italian centers), retrospective cohort study, starting from the 24th natalizumab infusion to the loss of follow-up or 2 years after baseline. Patients wer ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:To determine if the concentration and saturation of natalizumab (NTZ) administration at extended interval dosing (EID; every 5-8 weeks) over 18 months is able to be maintained in the range considered adequate to sustain the clinical efficacy of NTZ. In a cross-sectional assessment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who received standard interval dosing (every 4 weeks) or EID, serum NTZ concentrations were measured using ELISA, and α4-integrin receptor saturations were analyzed via cytometry, in blood samples obtained at trough timepoints. Trough serum concentration was above the "therapeutic" concentration of 2.0 μg/mL in 72% of EID patients. Trough saturation was above the "therapeutic" 50% threshold in 79% of EID-treated patients. Our model predicted that at least 9 NTZ infusions/year are required to maintain adequate trough saturation and concentration levels. Higher body mass index (BMI) was a predictor of suboptimal trough saturation on EID NTZ. Trough α4-integrin receptor saturation >50% correlated with high clinical efficacy of NTZ in previous studies. A continual treatment with EID maintains receptor saturation and concentration that are in the "therapeutic range" for most patients. This finding provides biological plausibility for the clinical efficacy of NTZ EID. Patients with higher BMI may require closer clinical and MRI follow-up.
| S-EPMC7057061 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Natalizumab is approved for multiple sclerosis treatment at a dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks. Extended-interval dosing of natalizumab has been proposed as a strategy to mitigate the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, but the efficacy of extended-interval dosing is not established. Previous models suggesting lower efficacy when initiating natalizumab treatment with extended-interval dosing rather than every-4-week dosing are inconsistent with reports from clinical observations and real-world studies conducted in patient populations switching to extended-interval dosing after a period of receiving natalizumab every 4 weeks. Here, the efficacy of natalizumab extended-interval dosing was modeled specifically in patients switching from every-4-week dosing to extended-interval dosing. Published population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were used to simulate the distribution of alpha-4 integrin saturations for different body weight categories and dosing intervals (every 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, or 12 weeks). Generalized estimating equations relating alpha-4 integrin saturation to probability of multiple sclerosis lesion or relapse were derived from RESTORE trial data, which included patients (n = 175) who discontinued natalizumab after being treated every 4 weeks for ≥1 year and had no relapses in the year before discontinuation. The model-based simulations described indicate that every-5-week or every-6-week dosing is likely to maintain the efficacy of natalizumab, particularly at body weights <80 kg, in patients who switch after a period of stability on every-4-week dosing. The efficacy of natalizumab decreases as dosing intervals and body weight increase. Partial model validation was achieved in that observed outcomes in an independent clinical study were similar to those predicted by the models.
| S-EPMC7891569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe enthusiasm for natalizumab, a highly efficacious agent in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), has been tempered by the risks of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with its use, and strategies to minimize those risks are of great interest. Extended interval dosing (EID) has been proposed as a way to maintain the efficacy of natalizumab while reducing exposure to it. We reviewed a cohort of patients who received natalizumab at 6-8-week intervals instead of the typical infusions every 4 weeks with the goal to assess if patients on EID had an increase in clinical relapses.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of all patients with MS treated with natalizumab at two MS centers where patients were offered the opportunity to switch to an EID every 6 or 8 weeks.ResultsA total of 361 patients received natalizumab for 22 ± 13 months (minimum duration 6 months). Of these, 96 patients received EID natalizumab at some point for 20 ± 11 months (minimum duration 6 months). Over the study period, there was no significant difference between the relapse rate in the monthly dosing (13%) and the EID (13%) groups of patients.ConclusionNatalizumab is effective in controlling MS as very few clinical relapses were observed in our dataset. We found that EID did not compromise the treatment effect as measured by relapse rate and no significant breakthrough disease activity was observed. EID is an optional regimen for maintenance natalizumab therapy, but prospective studies are warranted to determine its efficacy.
| S-EPMC4206618 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionNatalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent.ConclusionThese results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab.Clinical trialsgov identifier (NCT04580381).
| S-EPMC10043118 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo use the large dataset from the Tysabri Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH) program to compare progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk with natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID) vs standard interval dosing (SID) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included anti-JC virus antibody-positive patients (n = 35,521) in the TOUCH database as of June 1, 2017. The effect of EID on PML risk was evaluated with 3 planned analyses using Kaplan-Meier methods stratified by prior immunosuppressant use. Risk of PML was analyzed by Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, prior immunosuppressants, time since natalizumab initiation, and cumulative number of infusions.ResultsThis study included 35,521 patients (primary analysis: 1,988 EID, 13,132 SID; secondary analysis: 3,331 EID, 15,424 SID; tertiary analysis: 815 EID, 23,168 SID). Mean average dosing intervals were 35.0 to 43.0 and 29.8 to 30.5 days for the EID and SID cohorts, respectively. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of PML risk for EID vs SID were 0.06 (0.01-0.22, p < 0.001) and 0.12 (0.05-0.29, p < 0.001) for the primary and secondary analyses, respectively. Relative risk reductions were 94% and 88% in favor of EID for the primary and secondary analyses, respectively. The tertiary analysis included no cases of PML with EID.ConclusionNatalizumab EID is associated with clinically and statistically significantly lower PML risk than SID.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS, natalizumab EID is associated with a lower PML risk than SID.
| S-EPMC7010325 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab has been suggested to be associated with a reduced risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and short-term preservation of efficacy but its long-term effectiveness remain unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term effectiveness and safety of natalizumab in an EID setting in a cohort of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated for more than 7 years. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study, including 39 (34 female, 5 male) patients with clinically definite relapsing-MS, initially treated with standard interval dosing (SID) of natalizumab (mean time 54 months [SD29]) who were then switched to EID, every 8 weeks (mean time 76 months [SD13]). The main outcome measures included the following: i) annualized relapse rate (ARR), ii) radiological activity, iii) disability progression, and iv) NEDA-3 no evidence of disease activity index. EID preserved ARR, radiological activity, and prevented disability worsening during follow-up. The proportion of patients maintaining their NEDA-3 status after 24, 48, and 72 months of natalizumab administration in EID was 94%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. Stratified analysis according to history of drug therapy showed that the EID of natalizumab was slightly more effective in naïve patients than in those previously treated with other immunosuppressive drugs. No cases of PML or other severe adverse reactions were reported. In conclusion, long-term therapy with natalizumab in an EID setting following an SID regimen maintained its disease-modifying activity, and was safe and well tolerated for over 7 years. These encouraging observational results need to be confirmed in controlled clinical trials.
| S-EPMC8027344 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundExtended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab treatment is increasingly used in multiple sclerosis. Besides the clear anti-inflammatory effect, natalizumab is considered to have neuroprotective properties as well.ObjectivesThis study aimed to study the longitudinal effects of EID compared to standard interval dosing (SID) and natalizumab drug concentrations on brain atrophy.MethodsPatients receiving EID or SID of natalizumab with a minimum radiological follow-up of 2 years were included. Changes in brain atrophy measures over time were derived from clinical routine 3D-Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using SynthSeg.ResultsWe found no differences between EID (n = 32) and SID (n = 50) for whole brain (-0.21% vs -0.16%, p = 0.42), ventricular (1.84% vs 1.13%, p = 0.24), and thalamic (-0.32% vs -0.32%, p = 0.97) annualized volume change over a median follow-up of 3.2 years. No associations between natalizumab drug concentration and brain atrophy rate were found.ConclusionWe found no clear evidence that EID compared to SID or lower natalizumab drug concentrations have a negative impact on the development of brain atrophy over time.
| S-EPMC10851624 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Extended intervals between the first and second doses of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines may reduce the risk of myocarditis in children and adolescents. However, vaccine effectiveness after this extension remains unclear. To examine this potential variable effectiveness, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study of children and adolescents aged 5-17 years who had received two doses of BNT162b2 in Hong Kong. From January 1 to August 15, 2022, 5396 Covid-19 cases and 202 Covid-19 related hospitalizations were identified and matched with 21,577 and 808 controls, respectively. For vaccine recipients with extended intervals [≥28 days, adjusted odds ratio 0.718, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.619, 0.833] there was a 29.2%-reduced risk of Covid-19 infection compared to those with regular intervals (21-27 days). If the threshold was set at eight weeks, the risk reduction was estimated at 43.5% (aOR 0.565, 95% CI: 0.456, 0.700). In conclusion, longer dosing intervals for children and adolescents should be considered.
| S-EPMC10068718 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The high efficacy of natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is without controversy. Indeed, effective disease control was not only demonstrated in the pivotal trials but has been corroborated impressively in real-world observations. This monoclonal IgG4 antibody blocks the α4β1 integrin-mediated leukocyte-endothelial interaction and thereby inhibits the migration of immune cells to the brain parenchyma. However, treatment with natalizumab carries the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). This potentially lethal side effect is a significant limitation for treatment initiation and long-term therapy. Natalizumab is given intravenously or subcutaneously in the standard dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks, allowing drug concentrations at levels that ensure continuous α4β1 integrin receptor saturation on the surface of immune cells. Extended-interval dosing (EID) is an emerging treatment approach that aims to mitigate the natalizumab-related PML risk by prolonging the standard infusion intervals to 6 weeks or even more. This treatment approach may abrogate the PML risk due to improved immune surveillance within the central nervous system while maintaining clinical efficacy. Moreover, even an individual interval dosing can be envisioned based on the availability of a biomarker that is capable of monitoring both safety and efficacy aspects. This review summarizes the early and encouraging evidence for EID from observational and randomized-controlled trials and discusses current limitations and upcoming challenges for introducing a tailored treatment approach.
| S-EPMC9580073 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccumulating evidence supports the efficacy of administering natalizumab (NZ) with extended-interval dosing (EID) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).ObjectivesWe switched NZ dosing from 4-week to 6-week intervals in patients with RRMS, and investigated the effect on serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) concentrations.MethodsWe included two cohorts of patients with RRMS treated with NZ: one received the standard-interval dosing (4 weeks) at baseline, and were switched to 6-week intervals (EID4-6, N = 45). The other cohort received EID (5- or 6-week intervals) both at baseline and during follow-up (EID5/6, N = 25). Serum samples were collected in the EID4-6 cohort at every NZ infusion, for 12 months. The primary outcome was the change in sNfL concentrations after switching to EID.ResultsThe baseline mean sNfL concentration in the EID4-6 cohort was 10.5 ng/L (standard deviation (SD) = 6.1), and it remained unchanged at 12 months. Moreover, individual sNfL concentrations did not change significantly after extending the NZ dosing intervals. In addition, the EID4-6 and EID5/6 cohorts had similar baseline sNfL concentrations.ConclusionWe concluded that extending the NZ dosing interval did not increase axonal damage, as determined with sNfL, in patients with RRMS.
| S-EPMC9574231 | biostudies-literature