Dataset Information

Characterizing Disease Manifestations and Treatment Patterns Among Adults with Systemic Sclerosis: A Retrospective Analysis of a US Healthcare Claims Population.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Real-world use of immunomodulating therapy (IMT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) was investigated for the first time in a descriptive, retrospective cohort analysis of claims made in a healthcare insurance database to characterize treatment patterns and their alignment with SSc disease manifestations.

Methods

Treatment patterns and disease manifestations, symptoms, complications, and comorbidities were assessed in patients with SSc enrolled in a US healthcare claims database who received treatment between January 2006 and December 2013 and for whom data were available 6 months before and 12 months after SSc diagnosis.

Results

Among 7812 eligible patients, 6852 received treatments of interest for SSc and 2404 (30.8%) received IMT during the first year after SSc diagnosis. In the first year after diagnosis, the most common claims were for antibiotics (61.7%), opioids (50.6%), glucocorticoids (46.5%), and proton pump inhibitors (35.4%); the most common organs involved with complications among patients with SSc were lung (30.5%), heart (17.4%), and gastrointestinal tract (22.4%); the most common signs or symptoms were musculoskeletal (16.1%) and fatigue (10.5%); 1035 patients (15.1%) had infections and 14 (0.2%) had malignancies. Among patients who received IMT, 43.8% received at least hydroxychloroquine and 21.1% received at least methotrexate; 460 patients switched to a second IMT, 23.0% to at least methotrexate and 22.8% to at least mycophenolate mofetil. The most common comorbidities reported with first IMT were in lung (11.8%), overlap syndrome (8.4%), heart (5.3%), and gastrointestinal (6.8%) categories.

Conclusion

One-third of patients with SSc in the healthcare claims population received IMTs during the first year after diagnosis. However, patients who received IMTs had disease manifestations similar to those of the overall SSc healthcare claims population.

SUBMITTER: Gale SL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7021840 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAlopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disorder causing sudden, non-scarring hair loss. There are currently no drugs approved for AA treatment. This study assessed prevalence of comorbidities, treatments, and healthcare costs and resource utilization among patients with AA in the USA.MethodsPatients diagnosed with AA between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified in IBM MarketScan® Research Databases. Eligible patients had no other hair loss-related disorders and were continuously enrolled with medical and pharmacy benefits at least 12 months before and after AA diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize comorbid conditions, treatments related to AA or other autoimmune/inflammatory conditions, and all-cause and AA-specific healthcare costs and resource utilization identified from claims data.ResultsA total of 68,121 patients with AA were identified. Mean (SD) age was 40.3 (17.8) years and 61.0% were female. The most common comorbidities included hyperlipidemia (22.4%), hypertension (21.8%), thyroid disorders (13.1%), contact dermatitis or eczema (10.8%), depression (9.5%), and anxiety (8.4%). Comorbid autoimmune diseases included atopic dermatitis (2.8%), psoriasis (2.1%), chronic urticaria (1.5%), and rheumatoid arthritis (1.1%). During the 12-month follow-up period, 37,995 patients (55.8%) were prescribed treatment for their AA or other comorbid autoimmune/inflammatory disease; 44.9% of treated patients were prescribed therapy within 7 days of AA diagnosis. Of patients receiving treatment, 80.3% received topical steroids and 30.0% received oral steroids. Mean (SD) total healthcare costs were $11,241.21 ($43,839.69) for all-causes and $419.12 ($1534.99) for AA. AA-related expenses were driven by outpatient and prescription costs.ConclusionPatients with AA have a high comorbidity burden and lack of treatment. Current AA treatments, including systemic therapies other than oral steroids, were not frequently utilized in this study population. Healthcare costs incurred by patients with AA went beyond AA-related expenses. Longitudinal data are needed to better understand treatment trajectories and the disease burden in patients with AA.

Project description:Background Cardiovascular involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) comprises a wide range of manifestations with prevalence and incidence that remain uncertain. Methods and Results In the Danish administrative registries between 1995 and 2015, all patients aged ?18 years with a first diagnosis of SSc were matched by age and sex with controls (1:5) from the general population. Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases at the time of the SSc diagnosis and incidence during follow-up were assessed by in- and outpatient discharge diagnoses. Conditional logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used respectively to calculate odds ratios for prevalent cardiovascular diseases and hazard ratios (HRs) for incident diseases associated with SSc. Patients with SSc (n=2778; 76% women; mean±SD age: 55±15 years) had more established cardiovascular risk factors than their respective controls at baseline, including greater prevalence of hypertension (31.2% versus 21.0%, P<0.0001) and treated dyslipidemia (9.8% versus 8.5%, P=0.02). SSc was associated with an increased relative risk of developing most cardiovascular diseases, including myocardial infarction (HR: 2.08; 95% CI, 1.65-2.64), peripheral vascular disease (HR: 5.73; 95% CI, 4.63-7.09), pulmonary hypertension (HR: 21.18; 95% CI, 14.73-30.45), mitral regurgitation (HR: 4.60; 95% CI, 3.12-6.79), aortic regurgitation (HR: 3.78; 95% CI, 2.55-5.58), aortic stenosis (HR: 2.99; 95% CI, 2.25-3.97), pericarditis (HR: 8.78; 95% CI, 4.84-15.93), heart failure (HR: 2.86; 95% CI, 2.43-3.37), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.75; 95% CI, 1.51-2.04), and venous thromboembolism (HR: 2.10; 95% CI, 1.65-2.67). Additional adjustment for medications and comorbidities yielded results similar to the main analyses. Conclusions In this nationwide study, SSc was associated with greater risks of distinct cardiovascular diseases for patients than for matched controls, suggesting a significant disease-related adverse impact across the vascular bed and specific cardiac structures.

Project description:IntroductionTreatments for Peyronie's disease (PD) include surgical management and collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH).AimsTo evaluate PD treatment trends after CCH approval and compare clinical outcomes in CCH- and surgery-treated cohorts.MethodsPatients newly diagnosed with PD between January 2011 and December 2017 were identified in a U.S. claims database. Cohorts initiating treatment with CCH or surgery between January 2014 and June 2017 were included. Patients were continuously enrolled ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after index date. Post-treatment penile complications and analgesic use were compared 1 year after procedure in propensity score-matched cohorts.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures of this study were treatment patterns, penile complications, and analgesic use.ResultsIn the newly diagnosed PD cohort, 1,609 patients received CCH and 1,555 patients had surgery. Overall CCH or surgery treatment rate/year increased from 9.8% in 2014 to 15.5% in 2017, with <1% receiving verapamil or interferon. Initial treatment ratios of CCH to surgery increased from approximately 1:1 (2014) to 2:1 (2017). In the unmatched CCH (n = 1,227) and surgery (n = 620) cohorts, more (P < .05) surgery-treated patients received analgesics (particularly opioids), oral PD therapies, vacuum erection devices, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors before the index date. After propensity score matching (n = 620/cohort), newly occurring postprocedural complications during the follow-up period were higher in the surgery cohort (25.3% vs 18.4%, P = .003). The surgery cohort had significantly (P < .05) higher rates of erectile dysfunction (65.0% vs 44.8%), penile pain (17.9% vs 8.9%), and penile swelling (8.1% vs 5.2%) and was more likely to be prescribed opioids (93.3% vs 38.9%; P < .0001) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (27.0% vs 20.3%; P = .006).ConclusionCCH demonstrated fewer complications and less analgesic use than surgery and was used as the initial therapy for PD twice as often as surgery. L Trost, H Huang, X Han, et al. Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Outcomes with Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum vs Surgery in Peyronie's Disease: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis. Sex Med 2021;9:100321.

Project description:Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease initially recognized by hand involvement due to characteristic Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), puffy hands, skin thickening, and contractures resembling claw deformities. SSc contributes to hand impairment through inflammatory arthritis, joint contractures, tendon friction rubs (TFRs), RP, digital ulcers (DU), puffy hands, skin sclerosis, acro-osteolysis, and calcinosis. These manifestations, which often co-exist, can contribute to difficulty with occupational activities and activities of daily living (ADL), which can result in impaired quality of life. However, despite this knowledge, most diagnostic and treatment principles in SSc are focused on visceral manifestations due to known associations with morbidity and mortality. Treatment of inflammatory arthritis is symptom based and involves corticosteroids ?10mg daily, methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, tocilizumab, and abatacept. Small joint contractures are managed by principles of occupational hand therapy and rarely surgical procedures. TFRs may be treated similar to inflammatory arthritis with corticosteroids. All patients with RP and DU should keep digits covered and warm and avoid vasoconstrictive agents. Pharmacologic management of RP begins with use of calcium channel blockers, but additional agents that may be considered are fluoxetine and phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. DU management also involves vasodilators including calcium channel blockers and PDE5 inhibitors; bosentan has also been shown to prevent DU. In patients with severe RP and active DU, intravenous epoprostenol or iloprost can be used and surgical procedures, such as botulinum injections and digital sympathectomies, may be considered. For those with early diffuse cutaneous SSc needing immunosuppression for skin sclerosis, methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil can be used, but the agent of choice depends on co-existing manifestations, such as inflammatory arthritis and/or lung involvement. Various pharmacologic agents for calcinosis have been considered but are generally ineffective; however, surgical options, including excision of areas of calcinosis, can be considered. Overall management of hand impairment for all patients with SSc should include occupational hand therapy techniques such as range of motion exercises, paraffin wax, and devices to assist in ADL. Thus, treatment options for the various manifestations contributing to hand impairment in SSc are limited and often modestly efficacious at best. Robust studies are needed to address the manifestations of SSc that contribute to hand impairment.