Dataset Information

Probabilistic Approach for Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Pharmacophores.

ABSTRACT: Pharmacophore modeling is usually considered as a special type of virtual screening without probabilistic nature. Correspondence of at least one conformation of a molecule to pharmacophore is considered as evidence of its bioactivity. We show that pharmacophores can be treated as one-class machine learning models, and the probability the reflecting model's confidence can be assigned to a pharmacophore on the basis of their precision of active compounds identification on a calibration set. Two schemes (Max and Mean) of probability calculation for consensus prediction based on individual pharmacophore models were proposed. Both approaches to some extent correspond to commonly used consensus approaches like the common hit approach or the one based on a logical OR operation uniting hit lists of individual models. Unlike some known approaches, the proposed ones can rank compounds retrieved by multiple models. These approaches were benchmarked on multiple ChEMBL datasets used for ligand-based pharmacophore modeling and externally validated on corresponding DUD-E datasets. The influence of complexity of pharmacophores and their performance on a calibration set on results of virtual screening was analyzed. It was shown that Max and Mean approaches have superior early enrichment to the commonly used approaches. Thus, a well-performing, easy-to-implement, and probabilistic alternative to existing approaches for pharmacophore-based virtual screening was proposed.

SUBMITTER: Madzhidov TI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7024325 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Probabilistic Approach for Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Pharmacophores.

Madzhidov Timur I TI Rakhimbekova Assima A Kutlushuna Alina A Polishchuk Pavel P

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 20200117 2

Pharmacophore modeling is usually considered as a special type of virtual screening without probabilistic nature. Correspondence of at least one conformation of a molecule to pharmacophore is considered as evidence of its bioactivity. We show that pharmacophores can be treated as one-class machine learning models, and the probability the reflecting model's confidence can be assigned to a pharmacophore on the basis of their precision of active compounds identification on a calibration set. Two sc ...[more]

PMID: 31963467

Similar Datasets

Project description:To reduce time and cost, virtual ligand screening (VLS) often precedes experimental ligand screening in modern drug discovery. Traditionally, high-resolution structure-based docking approaches rely on experimental structures, while ligand-based approaches need known binders to the target protein and only explore their nearby chemical space. In contrast, our structure-based FINDSITEcomb2.0 approach takes advantage of predicted, low-resolution structures and information from ligands that bind distantly related proteins whose binding sites are similar to the target protein. Using a boosted tree regression machine learning framework, we significantly improved FINDSITEcomb2.0 by integrating ligand fragment scores as encoded by molecular fingerprints with the global ligand similarity scores of FINDSITEcomb2.0. The new approach, FRAGSITE, exploits our observation that ligand fragments, e.g., rings, tend to interact with stereochemically conserved protein subpockets that also occur in evolutionarily unrelated proteins. FRAGSITE was benchmarked on the 102 protein DUD-E set, where any template protein whose sequence identify >30% to the target was excluded. Within the top 100 ranked molecules, FRAGSITE improves VLS precision and recall by 14.3 and 18.5%, respectively, relative to FINDSITEcomb2.0. Moreover, the mean top 1% enrichment factor increases from 25.2 to 30.2. On average, both outperform state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods such as AtomNet. On the more challenging unbiased set LIT-PCBA, FRAGSITE also shows better performance than ligand similarity-based and docking approaches such as two-dimensional ECFP4 and Surflex-Dock v.3066. On a subset of 23 targets from DEKOIS 2.0, FRAGSITE shows much better performance than the boosted tree regression-based, vScreenML scoring function. Experimental testing of FRAGSITE's predictions shows that it has more hits and covers a more diverse region of chemical space than FINDSITEcomb2.0. For the two proteins that were experimentally tested, DHFR, a well-studied protein that catalyzes the conversion of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate, and the kinase ACVR1, FRAGSITE identified new small-molecule nanomolar binders. Interestingly, one new binder of DHFR is a kinase inhibitor predicted to bind in a new subpocket. For ACVR1, FRAGSITE identified new molecules that have diverse scaffolds and estimated nanomolar to micromolar affinities. Thus, FRAGSITE shows significant improvement over prior state-of-the-art ligand virtual screening approaches. A web server is freely available for academic users at http:/sites.gatech.edu/cssb/FRAGSITE.

Project description:We present Ligity, a hybrid ligand-structure-based, non-superpositional method for virtual screening of large databases of small molecules. Ligity uses the relative spatial distribution of pharmacophoric interaction points (PIPs) derived from the conformations of small molecules. These are compared with the PIPs derived from key interaction features found in protein-ligand complexes and are used to prioritize likely binders. We investigated the effect of generating PIPs using the single lowest energy conformer versus an ensemble of conformers for each screened ligand, using different bin sizes for the distance between two features, utilizing triangular sets of pharmacophoric features (3-PIPs) versus chiral tetrahedral sets (4-PIPs), fusing data for targets with multiple protein-ligand complex structures, and applying different similarity measures. Ligity was benchmarked using the Directory of Useful Decoys-Enhanced (DUD-E). Optimal results were obtained using the tetrahedral PIPs derived from an ensemble of bound ligand conformers and a bin size of 1.5 Å, which are used as the default settings for Ligity. The high-throughput screening mode of Ligity, using only the lowest-energy conformer of each ligand, was used for benchmarking against the whole of the DUD-E, and a more resource-intensive, "information-rich" mode of Ligity, using a conformational ensemble of each ligand, were used for a representative subset of 10 targets. Against the full DUD-E database, mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.44 to 0.99, while for the representative subset they ranged from 0.61 to 0.86. Data fusion further improved Ligity's performance, with mean AUC values ranging from 0.64 to 0.95. Ligity is very efficient compared to a protein-ligand docking method such as AutoDock Vina: if the time taken for the precalculation of Ligity descriptors is included in the comparason, then Ligity is about 20 times faster than docking. A direct comparison of the virtual screening steps shows Ligity to be over 5000 times faster. Ligity highly ranks the lowest-energy conformers of DUD-E actives, in a statistically significant manner, behavior that is not observed for DUD-E decoys. Thus, our results suggest that active compounds tend to bind in relatively low-energy conformations compared to decoys. This may be because actives-and thus their lowest-energy conformations-have been optimized for conformational complementarity with their cognate binding sites.

Project description:Virtual ligand screening is an integral part of the modern drug discovery process. Traditional ligand-based, virtual screening approaches are fast but require a set of structurally diverse ligands known to bind to the target. Traditional structure-based approaches require high-resolution target protein structures and are computationally demanding. In contrast, the recently developed threading/structure-based FINDSITE-based approaches have the advantage that they are as fast as traditional ligand-based approaches and yet overcome the limitations of traditional ligand- or structure-based approaches. These new methods can use predicted low-resolution structures and infer the likelihood of a ligand binding to a target by utilizing ligand information excised from the target's remote or close homologous proteins and/or libraries of ligand binding databases. Here, we develop an improved version of FINDSITE, FINDSITE(filt), that filters out false positive ligands in threading identified templates by a better binding site detection procedure that includes information about the binding site amino acid similarity. We then combine FINDSITE(filt) with FINDSITE(X) that uses publicly available binding databases ChEMBL and DrugBank for virtual ligand screening. The combined approach, FINDSITE(comb), is compared to two traditional docking methods, AUTODOCK Vina and DOCK 6, on the DUD benchmark set. It is shown to be significantly better in terms of enrichment factor, dependence on target structure quality, and speed. FINDSITE(comb) is then tested for virtual ligand screening on a large set of 3576 generic targets from the DrugBank database as well as a set of 168 Human GPCRs. Excluding close homologues, FINDSITE(comb) gives an average enrichment factor of 52.1 for generic targets and 22.3 for GPCRs within the top 1% of the screened compound library. Around 65% of the targets have better than random enrichment factors. The performance is insensitive to target structure quality, as long as it has a TM-score ≥ 0.4 to native. Thus, FINDSITE(comb) makes the screening of millions of compounds across entire proteomes feasible. The FINDSITE(comb) web service is freely available for academic users at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/skolnick/webservice/FINDSITE-COMB/index.html.

Dataset Information

Probabilistic Approach for Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Pharmacophores.

Publications

Probabilistic Approach for Virtual Screening Based on Multiple Pharmacophores.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets