Dataset Information

Performance and Accuracy of Four Open-Source Tools for In Silico Serotyping of Salmonella spp. Based on Whole-Genome Short-Read Sequencing Data.

ABSTRACT: We compared the performance of four open-source in silico Salmonella typing tools (SeqSero, SeqSero2, Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource [SISTR], and Metric Oriented Sequence Typer [MOST]) to assess their potential for replacing laboratory serological testing with serovar predictions from whole-genome sequencing data. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,624 Salmonella isolates of 72 serovars submitted to the German National Salmonella Reference Laboratory between 1999 and 2019. All isolates are derived from animal and foodstuff origins. We conducted Illumina short-read sequencing and compared the in silico serovar prediction results with the results of routine laboratory serotyping. We found the best-performing in silico serovar prediction tool to be SISTR, with 94% correctly typed isolates, followed by SeqSero2 (87%), SeqSero (81%), and MOST (79%). Furthermore, we found that mapping-based tools like SeqSero and SeqSero2 (allele mode) were more reliable for the prediction of monophasic variants, while sequence type and cluster-based methods like MOST and SISTR (core-genome multilocus sequence type [cgMLST]), showed greater resilience when confronted with GC-biased sequencing data. We showed that the choice of library preparation kit could substantially affect O antigen detection, due to the low GC content of the wzx and wzy genes. Although the accuracy of computational serovar predictions is still not quite on par with traditional serotyping by Salmonella reference laboratories, the command-line tools investigated in this study perform a rapid, efficient, inexpensive, and reproducible analysis, which can be integrated into in-house characterization pipelines. Based on our results, we find SISTR most suitable for automated, routine serotyping for public health surveillance of Salmonella IMPORTANCE Salmonella spp. are important foodborne pathogens. To reduce the number of infected patients, it is essential to understand which subtypes of the bacteria cause disease outbreaks. Traditionally, characterization of Salmonella requires serological testing, a laboratory method by which Salmonella isolates can be classified into over 2,600 distinct subtypes, called serovars. Due to recent advances in whole-genome sequencing, many tools have been developed to replace traditional testing methods with computational analysis of genome sequences. It is crucial to validate that these tools, many already in use for routine surveillance, deliver accurate and reliable serovar information. In this study, we set out to compare which of the currently available open-source command-line tools is most suitable to replace serological testing. A thorough evaluation of the differing computational approaches is highly important to ensure the backward compatibility of serotyping data and to maintain comparability between laboratories.

SUBMITTER: Uelze L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7028957 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Performance and Accuracy of Four Open-Source Tools for In Silico Serotyping of Salmonella spp. Based on Whole-Genome Short-Read Sequencing Data.

Uelze Laura L Borowiak Maria M Deneke Carlus C Szabó István I Fischer Jennie J Tausch Simon H SH Malorny Burkhard B

Applied and environmental microbiology 20200218 5

We compared the performance of four open-source in silico Salmonella typing tools (SeqSero, SeqSero2, Salmonella In Silico Typing Resource [SISTR], and Metric Oriented Sequence Typer [MOST]) to assess their potential for replacing laboratory serological testing with serovar predictions from whole-genome sequencing data. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,624 Salmonella isolates of 72 serovars submitted to the German National Salmonella Reference Laboratory between 19 ...[more]

PMID: 31862714

Similar Datasets

Project description:Bacteria of the genus Shigella, consisting of 4 species and >50 serotypes, cause shigellosis, a foodborne disease of significant morbidity, mortality, and economic loss worldwide. Classical Shigella identification based on selective media and serology is tedious, time-consuming, expensive, and not always accurate. A molecular diagnostic assay does not distinguish Shigella at the species level or from enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC). We inspected genomic sequences from 221 Shigella isolates and observed low concordance rates between conventional designation and molecular serotyping: 86.4% and 80.5% at the species and serotype levels, respectively. Serotype determinants for 6 additional serotypes were identified. Examination of differentiation gene markers commonly perceived as characteristic hallmarks in Shigella showed high variability among different serotypes. Using this information, we developed ShigaTyper, an automated workflow that utilizes limited computational resources to accurately and rapidly determine 59 Shigella serotypes using Illumina paired-end whole-genome sequencing (WGS) reads. Shigella serotype determinants and species-specific diagnostic markers were first identified through read alignment to an in-house curated reference sequence database. Relying on sequence hits that passed a threshold level of coverage and accuracy, serotype could be unambiguously predicted within 1 min for an average-size WGS sample of ∼500 MB. Validation with WGS data from 380 isolates showed an accuracy rate of 98.2%. This pipeline is the first step toward building a comprehensive WGS-based analysis pipeline of Shigella spp. in a field laboratory setting, where speed is essential and resources need to be more cost-effectively dedicated.IMPORTANCEShigella causes diarrheal disease with serious public health implications. However, conventional Shigella identification methods are laborious and time-consuming and can be erroneous due to the high similarity between Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) and cross-reactivity between serotyping antisera. Further, serotype interpretation is complicated for inexperienced users. To develop an easier method with higher accuracy based on whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for Shigella serotyping, we systematically examined genomic information of Shigella isolates from 53 serotypes to define rules for differentiation and serotyping. We created ShigaTyper, an automated pipeline that accurately and rapidly excludes non-Shigella isolates and identifies 59 Shigella serotypes using Illumina paired-end WGS reads. A serotype can be unambiguously predicted at a data processing speed of 538 MB/min with 98.2% accuracy from a regular laptop. Once it is installed, training in bioinformatics analysis and Shigella genetics is not required. This pipeline is particularly useful to general microbiologists in field laboratories.

Project description:Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica is a highly diverse subspecies with more than 1500 serovars and the ability to distinguish serovars within this group is vital for surveillance. With the development of whole-genome sequencing technology, serovar prediction by traditional serotyping is being replaced by molecular serotyping. Existing in silico serovar prediction approaches utilize surface antigen encoding genes, core genome MLST and serovar-specific gene markers or DNA fragments for serotyping. However, these serovar-specific gene markers or DNA fragments only distinguished a small number of serovars. In this study, we compared 2258 Salmonella accessory genomes to identify 414 candidate serovar-specific or lineage-specific gene markers for 106 serovars which includes 24 polyphyletic serovars and the paraphyletic serovar Enteritidis. A combination of several lineage-specific gene markers can be used for the clear identification of the polyphyletic serovars and the paraphyletic serovar. We designed and evaluated an in silico serovar prediction approach by screening 1089 genomes representing 106 serovars against a set of 131 serovar-specific gene markers. The presence or absence of one or more serovar-specific gene markers was used to predict the serovar of an isolate from genomic data. We show that serovar-specific gene markers have comparable accuracy to other in silico serotyping methods with 84.8% of isolates assigned to the correct serovar with no false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) and 10.5% of isolates assigned to a small subset of serovars containing the correct serovar with varied FP. Combined, 95.3% of genomes were correctly assigned to a serovar. This approach would be useful as diagnosis moves to culture-independent and metagenomic methods as well as providing a third alternative to confirm other genome-based analyses. The identification of a set of gene markers may also be useful in the development of more cost-effective molecular assays designed to detect specific gene markers of the all major serovars in a region. These assays would be useful in serotyping isolates where cultures are no longer obtained and traditional serotyping is therefore impossible.

Dataset Information

Performance and Accuracy of Four Open-Source Tools for In Silico Serotyping of Salmonella spp. Based on Whole-Genome Short-Read Sequencing Data.

Publications

Performance and Accuracy of Four Open-Source Tools for <i>In Silico</i> Serotyping of <i>Salmonella</i> spp. Based on Whole-Genome Short-Read Sequencing Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure