S-EPMC7042820 - Association of Monogenic vs Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia With Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. - OmicsDI

Unknown

Dataset Information

Association of Monogenic vs Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia With Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with lifelong elevations in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, many individuals with hypercholesterolemia have a polygenic rather than a monogenic cause for their condition. It is unclear if a genetic variant for hypercholesterolemia alters the risk of CVD.

Objectives

To assess whether a genetic variant for hypercholesterolemia alters the risk of atherosclerotic CVD and to evaluate how this risk compares with that of nongenetic hypercholesterolemia.

Design, setting, and participants

In this genetic-association, case-control, cohort study, individuals aged 40 to 69 years were recruited by the UK Biobank from across the United Kingdom between March 13, 2006, and October 1, 2010, and followed up until March 31, 2017. Genotyping array and exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank cohort were used to identify individuals with monogenic (LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9) or polygenic hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C polygenic score >95th percentile based on 223 single-nucleotide variants in the entire cohort). The data were analyzed from July 1, 2019, to December 30, 2019.

Main outcomes and measures

The study investigated the association of genotype with the risk of coronary and carotid revascularization, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality among the overall study population and among participants with monogenic FH (n = 277), polygenic hypercholesterolemia (n = 2379), or hypercholesterolemia with undetermined cause (n = 2232) at comparable levels of LDL-C measured at study enrollment.

Results

For the 48 741 individuals with genotyping array and exome sequencing data, the mean (SD) age was 56.6 (8.0) years, and 54.5% were female (n = 26 541 of 48 741). A monogenic FH variant for hypercholesterolemia was found in 277 individuals (0.57%, 1 in 176 individuals). Participants with monogenic FH were significantly more likely than those without monogenic FH to experience an atherosclerotic CVD event at 55 years or younger (17 of 277 [6.1%] vs 988 of 48 464 [2.0%]; P < .001). Compared with the general population, both monogenic and polygenic hypercholesterolemia were associated with an increased risk of CVD events. Moreover, among individuals with comparable levels of LDL-C, both monogenic (hazard ratio, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.34-2.77; P < .001) and polygenic hypercholesterolemia (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.55; P = .03) were significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD events compared with the risk of such events in individuals with hypercholesterolemia without an identified genetic cause.

Conclusions and relevance

The findings of this study suggest that among individuals with hypercholesterolemia, genetic determinants of LDL-C levels may impose additional risk of CVD. Thus, understanding the possible genetic cause of hypercholesterolemia may provide important prognostic information to treat patients.

SUBMITTER: Trinder M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7042820 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

Project description:Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) affects up to 1 in 200 individuals in the United States, but atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes of FH in the general US population have not been described. We therefore sought to evaluate long-term coronary heart disease (CHD) and total ASCVD risks in US adults with an FH phenotype.Using individual pooled data from 6 large US epidemiological cohorts, we stratified participants by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level at index ages from 20 to 79 years. For the primary analysis, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels ?190 and <130 mg/dL defined the FH phenotype and referent, respectively. Sensitivity analyses evaluated the effects of varying the FH phenotype definition. We used Cox regression models to assess covariate-adjusted associations of the FH phenotype with 30-year hazards for CHD (CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and total ASCVD (CHD or stroke).We included 68?565 baseline person-examinations; 3850 (5.6%) had the FH phenotype by the primary definition. Follow-up across index ages ranged from 78?985 to 308?378 person-years. After covariate adjustment, the FH phenotype was associated with substantially elevated 30-year CHD risk, with hazard ratios up to 5.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-21.7). Across index ages, CHD risk was accelerated in those with the FH phenotype by 10 to 20 years in men and 20 to 30 years in women. Similar patterns of results were found for total ASCVD risk, with hazard ratios up to 4.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-13.4). Alternative FH phenotype definitions incorporating family history, more stringent age-based low-density lipoprotein cholesterol thresholds, or alternative lipid fractions decreased the FH phenotype prevalence to as low as 0.2% to 0.4% without materially affecting CHD risk estimates (hazard ratios up to 8.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-61.6).In the general US population, the long-term ASCVD burden related to phenotypic FH, defined by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ?190 mg/dL, is likely substantial. Our finding of CHD risk acceleration may aid efforts in risk communication.

Project description:BackgroundHeterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder leading to a lifetime exposure to high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) level and an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We evaluate the effect of a causative genetic variant to predict ASCVD in HFH patients undergoing treatment.Materials and methodsA retrospective cohort was conducted on 289 patients with possible, probable, and definite diagnosis of HFH according to Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Score and in whom DNA analyses were performed and mean LDL-c level was above 155 mg/dl. The study population was divided into groups based on the presence or not of a causative variant (pathogenic or likely pathogenic). We observed each of the study's participants for the occurrence of ASCVD.ResultsA causative variant was detected in 42.2% of study participants, and ASCVD has occurred in 21.5% of HFH patients. The incidence of ASCVD (27% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.048) and the mean of LDL-c under an optimal medical treatment (226 ± 59 mg/dl vs. 203 ± 37 mg/dl, p = 0.001) were higher in HFH-causative variant carriers than others. After adjusting on confounders, ASCVD was positively associated with LDL-c level [OR = 2.347; 95% (1.305-4.221), p = 0.004] and tends toward a negative association with HDL-c level [OR = 0.140; 95% (0.017-1.166), p = 0.059]. There is no more association between the detection of a causative variant and the occurrence of ASCVD [OR = 1.708; 95% (0.899-3.242), p = 0.102]. Kaplan Meier and log rank test showed no significant differences in event-free survival analysis between study groups (p = 0.523).ConclusionIn this study population under medical care, it seems that the presence of a causative variant did not represent an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HFH patients, and LDL-c level played an undisputable causal role.