Dataset Information

The neoadjuvant paradigm reinvigorated: a review of pre-surgical immunotherapy in HNSCC.

ABSTRACT: Background:There remains up to a 50% recurrence rate in advanced p16- head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with current standard of care treatment. In an attempt to improve survival, multiple trials administering induction or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been conducted but none demonstrated improved overall survival. The established efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the recurrent and metastatic setting has produced widespread interest in their neoadjuvant use. Purpose:To survey the landscape of active neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and summarize and synthesize currently available outcomes from these trials. Conclusions:Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has proven safe and well tolerated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with encouraging efficacy results, including relatively high rates of pathologic response. Ongoing studies offer an opportunity to study immune responses in vivo. PD-L1 positivity, high tumor mutational burden and infiltration of NK cells, CD8, CD26 and Tim3 positive lymphocytes at time of surgery have been correlated with pathologic responses. We await updated reports of disease free survival and overall survival data and results of ongoing phase III studies utilizing neoadjuvant immunotherapy to determine if this treatment paradigm will have a place in the standard of care treatment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Stafford M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7077151 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The neoadjuvant paradigm reinvigorated: a review of pre-surgical immunotherapy in HNSCC.

Stafford Margaret M Kaczmar John J

Cancers of the head & neck 20200316

<h4>Background</h4>There remains up to a 50% recurrence rate in advanced p16- head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with current standard of care treatment. In an attempt to improve survival, multiple trials administering induction or neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been conducted but none demonstrated improved overall survival. The established efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the recurrent and metastatic setting has produced widespread interest in their neoadjuvant use.<h4>Purpose</h4> ...[more]

PMID: 32195008

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveEsophageal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors in China. Previous studies have shown that surgery alone is less effective. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, which is the standard treatment for locally advanced and operable esophageal cancer. Selection of appropriate surgical methods and timing after neoadjuvant therapy is of great significance for improving the prognosis of patients and reducing postoperative complications.MethodsAn online electronic search of all eligible literature through PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library database was conducted using a combination of the following keywords: esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeting, surgery, complications. With a focus on the use of surgery after neoadjuvant therapy, Eligible articles were identified by one or both authors.Key content and findingsNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with radical surgical resection remains the current standard of care for resectable esophageal cancer, significantly improving survival and pathologic complete response (PCR) compared with preoperative chemotherapy Recently, studies have also found that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has a more advantageous pathological response in patients with locally advanced disease. Although the emergence of targeted drugs has led to a change in treatment mode from traditional chemoradiotherapy to precision therapy, the postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) need to be explored as well as how surgery-related risks caused by treatment can be reduced. Traditionally, surgery is performed 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy, and optimal timing for surgery after treatment is still being explored as research progresses, the surgical method also should be determined according to the specific situation of the patient. Postoperative complications should be dealt with in a timely manner, and of course, active preoperative intervention is equally important.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant therapy combined with surgery is the gold standard for resectable esophageal cancer. However, optimal timing of surgery after preoperative treatment remains unclear. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery (including robotic surgery) has gradually replaced traditional open surgery. Active prevention before operation, accurate and meticulous operation during operation, and timely treatment after operation can minimize the incidence of adverse events.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) remains controversial in the United States. Generalizability of existing trial results has been criticized because of less aggressive debulking procedures than commonly used in the United States. As a result, economic evaluations using input data from these trials may not accurately reflect costs and outcomes associated with more aggressive primary surgery. Using data from an ongoing trial performing aggressive debulking, we investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of NACT versus PDS for AEOC. METHODS:A decision tree model was constructed to estimate differences in short-term outcomes and costs for a hypothetical cohort of 15,000 AEOC patients (US annual incidence of AEOC) treated with NACT versus PDS over a 1-year time horizon from a Medicare payer perspective. Outcomes included costs per cancer-related death averted, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. Base-case probabilities, costs, and utilities were based on the Surgical Complications Related to Primary or Interval Debulking in Ovarian Neoplasms trial. Base-case analyses assumed equivalent survival; threshold analysis estimated the maximum survival difference that would result in NACT being cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to characterize model uncertainty. RESULTS:Compared with PDS, NACT was associated with $142 million in cost savings, 1098 fewer cancer-related deaths, and 1355 life-years and 1715 QALYs gained, making it the dominant treatment strategy for all outcomes. In sensitivity analysis, NACT remained dominant in 99.3% of simulations. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remained cost-effective at $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds if survival differences were less than 2.7 and 1.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:In the short term, NACT is cost-saving with improved outcomes. However, if PDS provides a longer-term survival advantage, it may be cost-effective. Research is needed on the role of patient preferences in tradeoffs between survival and quality of life.

Dataset Information

The neoadjuvant paradigm reinvigorated: a review of pre-surgical immunotherapy in HNSCC.

Publications

The neoadjuvant paradigm reinvigorated: a review of pre-surgical immunotherapy in HNSCC.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets