The Perioperative Use of Albumin
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Farag E
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7123816 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Objectives:To investigate the effect of albumin exposure in ICU after cardiac surgery on hospital mortality, complications, and costs. Design:A retrospective, single-center cohort study with economic evaluation. Setting:Cardiothoracic ICU in Australia. Patients:Adult patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac surgery. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Comparison of outcomes and costs in ICU after cardiac surgery based on 4% human albumin exposure. During the study period, 3,656 patients underwent cardiac surgery. After exclusions, 2,594 patients were suitable for analysis. One-thousand two-hundred sixty-four (48.7%) were exposed to albumin and 19 (1.4%) of those died. The adjusted hospital mortality of albumin exposure compared with no albumin was not significant (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.56-2.79; p = 0.6). More patients exposed to albumin returned to the operating theater for bleeding and/or tamponade (6.1% vs 2.1%; odds ratio, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.81-4.45; p < 0.01) and received packed red cell transfusions (p < 0.001). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were prolonged in those exposed to albumin (mean difference, 18 hr; 95% CI, 10.3-25.6; p < 0.001 and 87.5 hr; 95% CI, 40.5-134.6; p < 0.001). Costs (U.S. dollar) were higher in patients exposed to albumin, compared with those with no albumin exposure (mean difference in ICU costs, $2,728; 95% CI, $1,566-3,890 and mean difference in hospital costs, $5,427; 95% CI, $3,294-7,560). Conclusions:There is no increased mortality in patients who are exposed to albumin after cardiac surgery. The patients exposed to albumin had higher illness severity, suffered more complications, and incurred higher healthcare costs. A randomized controlled trial is required to determine whether albumin use is effective and safe in this setting.
| S-EPMC7365709 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether the perioperative use of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and albumin 5% in elective joint arthroplasties are associated with an increased risk for perioperative complications.DesignRetrospective cohort study of population based data between 2006 and 2013.SettingData from 510 different hospitals across the United States participating in the Premier Perspective database.Participants1,051,441 patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasties.ExposuresPerioperative fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 6% or albumin 5%, or neither.Main outcome measuresAcute renal failure and thromboembolic, cardiac, and pulmonary complications.ResultsCompared with patients who received neither colloid, perioperative fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 6% or albumin 5% was associated with an increased risk of acute renal failure (odds ratios 1.23 (95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.34) and 1.56 (1.36 to 1.78), respectively) and most other complications. A recent decrease in hydroxyethyl starch 6% use was noted, whereas that of albumin 5% increased.ConclusionsSimilar to studies in critically ill patients, we showed that use of hydroxyethyl starch 6% was associated with an increased risk of acute renal failure and other complications in the elective perioperative orthopedic setting. This increased risk also applied to albumin 5%. These findings raise questions regarding the widespread use of these colloids in elective joint arthroplasty procedures.
| S-EPMC4376265 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceIncreased use of benzodiazepines has resulted in increasing rates of misuse and adverse effects associated with these drugs. Little is known about the initial exposure and source of benzodiazepines among those who use them persistently.ObjectiveTo examine the frequency of use and persistent use of benzodiazepines among patients undergoing major and minor surgical procedures.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included 2 509 599 adult patients who underwent 1 of 11 common surgical procedures in the United States from 2009 to 2017 and were recorded in the MarketScan database. The rates of perioperative and persistent benzodiazepine use were examined in benzodiazepine-naive patients. Data analysis was conducted from July to November 2020.Main outcomes and measuresReceipt of a perioperative benzodiazepine prescription and persistent use (ie, fill of a second prescription 90-180 days after surgery) among those who received a benzodiazepine perioperatively.ResultsAmong 2 509 599 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 54.4 (15.3) years, and 1 596 137 (63.6%) were women. Perioperative benzodiazepine use was noted in 63 931 patients (2.6%). The median (interquartile range) benzodiazepine supply was 10 (5-23) days. Among benzodiazepine-naive patients prescribed a perioperative benzodiazepine, the rate of persistent benzodiazepine use was 19.5% (95% CI, 19.2%-19.8%). During the 90 to 180-day period after surgery, 7013 of 12 468 patients (56.2%) received 1 prescription for benzodiazepines while 5455 (43.8%) received 2 or more prescriptions. Among patients prescribed a benzodiazepine, persistent use was more common in Medicaid recipients (vs patients with commercial insurance: adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62), patients 70 years or older (vs those aged 40-49 years: aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), in women (vs men: aRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15), in patients with more medical comorbidities (eg, Elixhauser comorbidity score ≥3 vs 0: aRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19), and in those with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, insomnia or substance use disorder (eg, with vs without anxiety: aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.37-1.50).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, a relatively small percentage of surgical patients were prescribed benzodiazepines in the perioperative period; however, 1 in 5 of these patients went on to persistent benzodiazepine use.
| S-EPMC8176328 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5546394 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose of reviewThe main purpose of this article is to review recent literature regarding multimodal analgesia medications, citing their recommended doses, efficacy, and side effects. The second part of this report will provide a description of drugs in different stages of development which have novel mechanisms with less side effects such as tolerance and addiction.Recent findingsMultimodal analgesia is a technique that facilitates perioperative pain management by employing two or more systemic analgesics along with regional anesthesia, when possible. Even though opioids and non-opioid analgesics remain the most common medication used for acute pain management after surgery, they have many undesirable side effects including the potential for misuse. Newer analgesics including peripheral acting opioids, nitric oxide inhibitors, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, interleukin-6 receptor antagonists and gene therapy are under intensive investigation.SummaryA patient's first exposure to opioids is often in the perioperative setting, a vulnerable time when multimodal therapy can play a large role in decreasing opioid exposure. Additionally, the current shift towards faster recovery times, fewer post-operative complications and improved cost-effectiveness during the perioperative period has made multimodal analgesia a central pillar of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.
| S-EPMC7709949 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Aim:A reliable classification for predicting postoperative prognosis and perioperative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is required to make a precise decision for HCC treatment. In the present study, we assessed the perioperative and prognostic importance of indocyanine green (ICG) testing, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and ALBI-TNM (ALBI-T) score using consecutive resected HCC cases. Methods:Between 1998 and 2011, 273 consecutive patients who underwent primary and curative hepatectomy for HCC were identified. Among these 273 cases, 235 Child-Pugh class A patients were enrolled in the present study. Results:Correlation analysis showed that the value of linear predictor for ALBI grade was significantly correlated with ICG 15-minute retention rates (r = 0.51, P < 0.0001). Survival analysis for both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) showed there were significant differences between the two groups stratified by stage or ALBI-T score (stage, RFS: P = 0.01, OS: P = 0.003; ALBI-T, RFS: P < 0.0001, OS: P < 0.0001). In addition, Cox proportional hazard model identified ALBI-T score was a significant predictor for both RFS and OS (RFS, P = 0.001; OS, P = 0.004). Furthermore, ALBI-T score could predict perioperative risk in hepatectomy such as longer operation time and excessive intraoperative blood loss. Conclusions:This study showed a robust association of ALBI-T score with postoperative HCC patient survival and perioperative risk in hepatectomy. ALBI-T score can be used as a simple and powerful tool for assessing HCC patients with further study.
| S-EPMC6345730 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Practice guidelines for perioperative pain management recommend that multimodal analgesic therapy should be used for all postsurgical patients. However, the proportion of patients who actually receive this evidence-based approach is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe hospital-level patterns in the utilization of perioperative multimodal analgesia.Data for the study were obtained from the Premier Research Database. Patients undergoing below-knee amputation, open lobectomy, total knee arthroplasty, and open colectomy between 2007 and 2014 were included in the analysis. Patients were considered to have multimodal therapy if they received one or more nonopioid analgesic therapies. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to estimate the hospital-specific frequency of multimodal therapy use while adjusting for the case mix of patients and hospital characteristics and accounting for random variation.The cohort consisted of 799,449 patients who underwent a procedure at 1 of 315 hospitals. The mean probability of receiving multimodal therapy was 90.4%, with 95% of the hospitals having a predicted probability between 42.6 and 99.2%. A secondary analysis examined whether patients received two or more nonopioid analgesics, which gave an average predicted probability of 54.2%, with 95% of the hospitals having a predicted probability between 9.3 and 93.2%.In this large nationwide sample of surgical admissions in the United States, the authors observed tremendous variation in the utilization of multimodal therapy not accounted for by patient or hospital characteristics. Efforts should be made to identify why there are variations in the use of multimodal analgesic therapy and to promote its adoption in appropriate patients.
| S-EPMC4792695 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Opioid-related overdose deaths have reached epidemic levels within the last decade. The efforts to prevent, identify, and treat opioid use disorders (OUDs) mostly focus on the outpatient setting. Despite their frequent overrepresentation, less is known about the inpatient management of patients with OUDs. Specifically, the perioperative phase is a very vulnerable time for patients with OUDs, and little has been studied on the optimal management of acute pain in these patients. The preoperative evaluation should aim to identify those with OUDs and assess factors that may interfere with OUD treatment and pain management. Efforts should be made to provide education and assistance to patients and their support systems. For those who are actively struggling with opioid use, the perioperative phase can be an opportunity for engagement and to initiate treatment. Buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone medication treatment for OUD and opioid tolerance complicate perioperative pain management. A multidisciplinary team approach is crucial to provide clinically balanced pain relief without jeopardizing the patient's recovery. This article reviews the existing literature on the perioperative management of patients with OUDs and provides clinical suggestions for the optimal care of this patient population.
| S-EPMC6523021 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background In randomized controlled trials, perioperative administration of amiodarone has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial arrhythmias and length of stay (LOS) among patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. However, little is known about the use or effectiveness of perioperative amiodarone in routine clinical practice. Methods and Results We studied patients ≥18 years old without a previous history of atrial or ventricular arrhythmias who underwent elective coronary bypass surgery between 2013 and 2014 within a network of 235 US hospitals. Perioperative amiodarone was defined as receipt of amiodarone either on the day of or the day preceding surgery. We used covariate-adjusted modeling and instrumental variable methods to examine the association between receipt of amiodarone and the development of atrial arrhythmias, in-hospital mortality, readmission, LOS, and cost. Of 12 758 patients, 2195 (17.2%) received perioperative amiodarone, 3330 (26.1%) developed atrial arrhythmias postoperatively, and the average LOS was 6.4 days (±2.6 days). Instrumental variable analysis showed that receipt of perioperative amiodarone was associated with lower risk of atrial arrhythmias (risk difference -11 percentage points, 95% CI -19 to -4 percentage points; P=0.002) and a shorter LOS (-0.7 day, 95% CI -1.39 to -0.01 days; P=0.048). There was no association between receipt of perioperative amiodarone and in-hospital mortality, cost, or readmission. Conclusions Among patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery without previous arrhythmias, perioperative amiodarone is associated with a lower risk of atrial arrhythmias and shorter LOS. These findings are consistent with previous randomized trials and lend support to current guideline recommendations.
| S-EPMC6761672 | biostudies-other
Project description:As countries progressively embrace the legalization of both medicinal and recreational cannabis, there remains a significant knowledge gap when it comes to the perioperative uses of cannabis, as well as the management of cannabis users. This review summarizes the information available on the subject based on existing published studies. Articles outlining the physiological changes occurring in the human body during acute and chronic use of cannabis (outside the context of anesthesia) are also taken into consideration as understanding these changes allows a more calculated approach to better anticipate patients' needs in the perioperative setting. Common questions facing the anesthesiologist at each phase of the perioperative period will be addressed and a systematic approach to the effect of cannabinoids on various organ systems will also be presented. Issues unique to cannabis use such as cannabis withdrawal syndrome and alterations in post-operative pain processing will also be discussed. To date, the number of studies available for guidance is small and study designs are markedly heterogenous, if not limited, making conclusions challenging. While the currently available information can assist in making decisions, further studies of larger scale are eagerly anticipated to help guide future patient care.
| S-EPMC6922064 | biostudies-literature