Dataset Information

Multi-objective optimization for EEG channel selection and accurate intruder detection in an EEG-based subject identification system.

ABSTRACT: We present a four-objective optimization method for optimal electroencephalographic (EEG) channel selection to provide access to subjects with permission in a system by detecting intruders and identifying the subject. Each instance was represented by four features computed from two sub-bands, extracted using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for each channel, and the feature vectors were used as input for one-class/multi-class support vector machines (SVMs). We tested the method on data from the event-related potentials (ERPs) of 26 subjects and 56 channels. The optimization process was performed by the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA), which found a three-channel combination that achieved an accuracy of 0.83, with both a true acceptance rate (TAR) and a true rejection rate (TRR) of 1.00. In the best case, we obtained an accuracy of up to 0.98 for subject identification with a TAR of 0.95 and a TRR 0.93, all using seven EEG channels found by NSGA-III in a subset of subjects manually created. The findings were also validated using 10 different subdivisions of subjects randomly created, obtaining up to 0.97 ± 0.02 of accuracy, a TAR of 0.81 ± 0.12 and TRR of 0.85 ± 0.10 using eight channels found by NSGA-III. These results support further studies on larger datasets for potential applications of EEG in identification and authentication systems.

SUBMITTER: Moctezuma LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7125093 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multi-objective optimization for EEG channel selection and accurate intruder detection in an EEG-based subject identification system.

Moctezuma Luis Alfredo LA Molinas Marta M

Scientific reports 20200403 1

We present a four-objective optimization method for optimal electroencephalographic (EEG) channel selection to provide access to subjects with permission in a system by detecting intruders and identifying the subject. Each instance was represented by four features computed from two sub-bands, extracted using empirical mode decomposition (EMD) for each channel, and the feature vectors were used as input for one-class/multi-class support vector machines (SVMs). We tested the method on data from th ...[more]

PMID: 32246122

Similar Datasets

Project description:The advent of two-photon microscopy now reveals unprecedented, detailed spatio-temporal data on cellular motility and interactions in vivo. Understanding cellular motility patterns is key to gaining insight into the development and possible manipulation of the immune response. Computational simulation has become an established technique for understanding immune processes and evaluating hypotheses in the context of experimental data, and there is clear scope to integrate microscopy-informed motility dynamics. However, determining which motility model best reflects in vivo motility is non-trivial: 3D motility is an intricate process requiring several metrics to characterize. This complicates model selection and parameterization, which must be performed against several metrics simultaneously. Here we evaluate Brownian motion, Lévy walk and several correlated random walks (CRWs) against the motility dynamics of neutrophils and lymph node T cells under inflammatory conditions by simultaneously considering cellular translational and turn speeds, and meandering indices. Heterogeneous cells exhibiting a continuum of inherent translational speeds and directionalities comprise both datasets, a feature significantly improving capture of in vivo motility when simulated as a CRW. Furthermore, translational and turn speeds are inversely correlated, and the corresponding CRW simulation again improves capture of our in vivo data, albeit to a lesser extent. In contrast, Brownian motion poorly reflects our data. Lévy walk is competitive in capturing some aspects of neutrophil motility, but T cell directional persistence only, therein highlighting the importance of evaluating models against several motility metrics simultaneously. This we achieve through novel application of multi-objective optimization, wherein each model is independently implemented and then parameterized to identify optimal trade-offs in performance against each metric. The resultant Pareto fronts of optimal solutions are directly contrasted to identify models best capturing in vivo dynamics, a technique that can aid model selection more generally. Our technique robustly determines our cell populations' motility strategies, and paves the way for simulations that incorporate accurate immune cell motility dynamics.

Project description:Accurate and reliable predictions of bacterial growth and metabolism from unstructured kinetic models are critical to the proper operation and design of engineered biological treatment and remediation systems. As such, parameter estimation has progressed into a routine challenge in the field of Environmental Engineering. Among the main issues identified with parameter estimation, the model-data calibration approach is a crucial, yet an often overlooked and difficult optimization problem. Here, a novel and rigorous global, multi objective, and fully Bayesian optimization approach that overcomes challenges associated with multi-variate, sparse and noisy data, as well as highly non-linear model structures commonly encountered in Environmental Engineering practice is presented. This optimization approach allows an improved definition and targeting of the compromise solution space for all multivariate problems, allowing efficient convergence, and a Bayesian component to thoroughly explore parameter and model prediction uncertainty. This global optimization approach outperformed, in terms of parameter accuracy and precision, standard, local non-linear regression routines and overcomes issues associated with premature convergence and addresses overfitting of different variables in the calibration process. •A sequential single, multi-objective, and Bayesian optimization workflow was developed to accurately and reliably estimate unstructured kinetic model parameters.•The global, single objective approach defines the global optimum (the best compromise solution) and "extreme" parameter solutions for each variable, while the global, multi-objective approach confirms the "best" compromise solution space for the Bayesian search to target and convergence is assessed using the single objective results.•The Approximate Bayesian Computational approach fully explores parameter and model prediction uncertainty targeting the compromise solution space previously identified.

Project description:High-density Electroencephalography (HD-EEG) has proven to be the EEG montage that estimates the neural activity inside the brain with highest accuracy. Multiple studies have reported the effect of electrode number on source localization for specific sources and specific electrode configurations. The electrodes for these configurations are often manually selected to uniformly cover the entire head, going from 32 to 128 electrodes, but electrode configurations are not often selected according to their contribution to estimation accuracy. In this work, an optimization-based study is proposed to determine the minimum number of electrodes that can be used and to identify the optimal combinations of electrodes that can retain the localization accuracy of HD-EEG reconstructions. This optimization approach incorporates scalp landmark positions of widely used EEG montages. In this way, a systematic search for the minimum electrode subset is performed for single- and multiple-source localization problems. The Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) combined with source reconstruction methods is used to formulate a multi-objective optimization problem that concurrently minimizes (1) the localization error for each source and (2) the number of required EEG electrodes. The method can be used for evaluating the source localization quality of low-density EEG systems (e.g. consumer-grade wearable EEG). We performed an evaluation over synthetic and real EEG datasets with known ground-truth. The experimental results show that optimal subsets with 6 electrodes can attain an equal or better accuracy than HD-EEG (with more than 200 channels) for a single source case. This happened when reconstructing a particular brain activity in more than 88% of the cases in synthetic signals and 63% in real signals, and in more than 88% and 73% of cases when considering optimal combinations with 8 channels. For a multiple-source case of three sources (only with synthetic signals), it was found that optimized combinations of 8, 12 and 16 electrodes attained an equal or better accuracy than HD-EEG with 231 electrodes in at least 58%, 76%, and 82% of cases respectively. Additionally, for such electrode numbers, lower mean errors and standard deviations than with 231 electrodes were obtained.

Project description:In scientific disciplines, benchmarks play a vital role in driving progress forward. For a benchmark to be effective, it must closely resemble real-world tasks. If the level of difficulty or relevance is inadequate, it can impede progress in the field. Moreover, benchmarks should have low computational overhead to ensure accessibility and repeatability. The objective is to achieve a kind of ``Turing test'' by creating a surrogate model that is practically indistinguishable from the ground truth observation, at least within the dataset's explored boundaries. This objective necessitates a large quantity of data. This data encompasses numerous features that are characteristic of chemistry and materials science optimization tasks that are relevant to industry. These features include high levels of noise, multiple fidelities, multiple objectives, linear constraints, non-linear correlations, and failure regions. We performed 494498 random hard-sphere packing simulations representing 206 CPU days' worth of computational overhead. Simulations required nine input parameters with linear constraints and two discrete fidelities each with continuous fidelity parameters. The data was logged in a free-tier shared MongoDB Atlas database, producing two core tabular datasets: a failure probability dataset and a regression dataset. The failure probability dataset maps unique input parameter sets to the estimated probabilities that the simulation will fail. The regression dataset maps input parameter sets (including repeats) to particle packing fractions and computational runtimes for each of the two steps. These two datasets were used to create a surrogate model as close as possible to running the actual simulations by incorporating simulation failure and heteroskedastic noise. In the regression dataset, percentile ranks were calculated for each group of identical parameter sets to account for heteroskedastic noise, thereby ensuring reliable and accurate data. This differs from the conventional approach that imposes a-priori assumptions, such as Gaussian noise, by specifying mean and standard deviation. This technique can be extended to other benchmark datasets to bridge the gap between optimization benchmarks with low computational overhead and the complex optimization scenarios encountered in the real world.

Dataset Information

Multi-objective optimization for EEG channel selection and accurate intruder detection in an EEG-based subject identification system.

Publications

Multi-objective optimization for EEG channel selection and accurate intruder detection in an EEG-based subject identification system.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets