Dataset Information

Clinical significance of PET/CT uptake for peripheral clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:In this cohort study, we determined the clinical value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). STUDY DESIGN:A retrospective review of NSCLC patients was performed from January 2011 to December 2017. Peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients with tumor size ?2 cm were included. SUVmax was calculated as a continuous variable for semiquantitative analyses. A receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed to assess the cutoff threshold of SUVmax on pathological (p) nodal metastasis. We further evaluated the clinical relevance of SUVmax in peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients. RESULTS:A total of 670 peripheral NSCLC patients with tumor size ?2 cm were deemed cN0 by preoperative PET/CT scan. Statistical analyses suggested significant correlations of SUVmax with smoking status (P = .026), tumor volume (P = .001), pathology type (P = .008), tumor differentiation (P < .001), vessel invasion (P = .001), plural invasion (P < .001), pT stage (P < .001), nodal involvement (P < .001), and pathological tumor node metastasis stage (P < .001). A cutoff point of SUVmax of 3.8 (P < .001) could be used to predict pathological nodal metastasis. Multivariable analyses indicated that preoperative SUVmax >3.8 (odds ratio, 12.149; P < .001) was an independent predictor of nodal metastasis. Overall survival analyses further suggested that SUVmax was an independent prognostic indicator (hazard ratio, 2.050; P = .017). CONCLUSION:Preoperative SUVmax is a predictor of pathological nodal metastasis and prognosis for peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients with tumor size ?2 cm. Our results indicate that assessment of PET SUVmax could improve stratification of these patients.

SUBMITTER: Wang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7131855 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical significance of PET/CT uptake for peripheral clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Wang Shuai S Lin Dong D Yang Xiaodong X Zhan Cheng C Zhao Shihai S Luo Rongkui R Wang Qun Q Tan Lijie L

Cancer medicine 20200213 7

<h4>Objective</h4>In this cohort study, we determined the clinical value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).<h4>Study design</h4>A retrospective review of NSCLC patients was performed from January 2011 to December 2017. Peripheral cN0 NSCLC patients with tumor size ≤2 cm were included. SUVmax was calculated as a continuous variable for semiquantitative analyses. A receiver operating characteristic curve was analyzed to assess ...[more]

PMID: 32056387

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo develop and validate a PET/CT nomogram for preoperative estimation of lymph node (LN) staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsA total of 263 pathologically confirmed LNs from 124 patients with NCSLC were retrospectively analyzed. Positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) examination was performed before treatment according to the clinical schedule. In the training cohort (N = 185), malignancy-related features, such as SUVmax, short-axis diameter (SAD), and CT radiomics features, were extracted from the regions of LN based on the PET/CT scan. The Minimum-Redundancy Maximum-Relevance (mRMR) algorithm and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model were used for feature selection and radiomics score building. The radiomics score (Rad-Score) and SUVmax were incorporated in a PET/CT nomogram using the multivariable logistic regression analysis. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated with discrimination, calibration, and clinical application in an independent testing cohort (N = 78).ResultsThe radiomics scores consisting of 14 selected features were significantly associated with LN status for both training cohort with AUC of 0.849 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.796-0.903) and testing cohort with AUC of 0.828 (95% CI, 0.782-0.919). The PET/CT nomogram incorporating radiomics score and SUVmax showed moderate improvement of the efficiency with AUC of 0.881 (95% CI, 0.834-0.928) in the training cohort and AUC of 0.872 (95% CI, 0.797-0.946) in the testing cohort. The decision curve analysis indicated that the PET/CT nomogram was clinically useful.ConclusionThe PET/CT nomogram, which incorporates Rad-Score and SUVmax, can improve the diagnostic performance of LN metastasis.Key points• The PET/CT nomogram (Int-Score) based on lymph node (LN) PET/CT images can reliably predict LN status in NSCLC. • Int-Score is a relatively objective diagnostic method, which can play an auxiliary role in the process of clinicians making treatment decisions.

Project description:IntroductionA previous study showed that use of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for surveillance after treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) does not yield a detection or survival benefit over the use of chest CT. However, PET/CT remains a common method of follow-up imaging. Here we estimated and compared the costs of PET/CT versus CT for surveillance of patients with stage III NSCLC and identified patient and provider demographic characteristics associated with preference for use of PET/CT.Patients and methodsWe reviewed 178 patients with stage III NSCLC who had received ≥ 1 PET/CT scan within 6 months of completing radiotherapy (n = 89) or had received CT after radiotherapy (n = 89) from 2000 to 2011. Costs were measured according to Medicare payments converted from institutional billing records. Total and imaging costs were analyzed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after the end of treatment. Patient and provider demographic characteristics were also evaluated for potential associations with PET/CT use.ResultsTotal costs in the PET/CT group were higher during the first 18 months after treatment (P = .002 at 6 months, P = .019 at 12 months, and P = .018 at 18 months) but was marginally significant (P = .05) at 24 months. In univariate analysis of demographic variables, patients who lived in a state different from the treatment center might have been more likely to receive PET/CT (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; P = .051). In multivariate analysis, patients treated in 2007 to 2010 (OR, 29.9; P < .001) or 2003 to 2006 (OR, 11.6; P = .002) were more likely to receive PET/CT than patients treated in 1999 to 2002. In addition, radiation oncologists with > 10 years of experience were more likely to use PET/CT than those with less experience, although this result might be confounded by the small number of providers.ConclusionUse of PET/CT was associated with higher costs for 18 months after treatment, but the difference was at the borderline of statistical significance at 24 months.

Project description:Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is heterogeneous in tumor burden, and its treatment is variable. Whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) has been shown to be an independent prognostic index for overall survival (OS). However, the potential of MTVWB to risk-stratify stage IIIA NSCLC has previously been unknown. If we can identify subgroups within the stage exhibiting significant OS differences using MTVWB, MTVWB may lead to adjustments in patients' risk profile evaluations and may, therefore, influence clinical decision making regarding treatment. We estimated the risk-stratifying capacity of MTVWB in stage IIIA by comparing OS of stratified stage IIIA with stage IIB and IIIB NSCLC.We performed a retrospective review of 330 patients with clinical stage IIB, IIIA, and IIIB NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. The patients' clinical TNM stage, initial MTVWB, and long-term survival data were collected. Patients with TNM stage IIIA disease were stratified by MTVWB. The optimal MTVWB cutoff value for stage IIIA patients was calculated using sequential log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier OS analysis with log-rank tests were performed.The optimal MTVWB cut-point was 29.2 mL for the risk-stratification of stage IIIA. We identified statistically significant differences in OS between stage IIB and IIIA patients (p?<?0.01), between IIIA and IIIB patients (p?<?0.01), and between the stage IIIA patients with low MTVWB (below 29.2 mL) and the stage IIIA patients with high MTVWB (above 29.2 mL) (p?<?0.01). There was no OS difference between the low MTVWB stage IIIA and the cohort of stage IIB patients (p?=?0.485), or between the high MTVWB stage IIIA patients and the cohort of stage IIIB patients (p?=?0.459). Similar risk-stratification capacity of MTVWB was observed in a large range of cutoff values from 15 to 55 mL in stage IIIA patients.Using MTVWB cutoff points ranging from 15 to 55 mL with an optimal value of 29.2 mL, stage IIIA NSCLC may be effectively stratified into subgroups with no significant survival difference from stages IIB or IIIB NSCLC. This may result in more accurate survival estimation and more appropriate risk adapted treatment selection in stage IIIA NSCLC.

Dataset Information

Clinical significance of PET/CT uptake for peripheral clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Publications

Clinical significance of PET/CT uptake for peripheral clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure