Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA GHET1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: Background:A number of studies have demonstrated the critical role of long non-coding RNA gastric cancer high expressed transcript 1 (GHET1) in many cancers. This meta-analysis provides an evidence-based evaluation of the prognostic role of GHET1 in cancer. Materials and methods:Literature searches were conducted in several databases including Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the role of GHET1 in cancer. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42018111252). Results:Sixteen studies, containing 1315 patients, were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that GHET1 overexpression was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cancer. Moreover, up-regulation of GHET1 expression predicted larger tumor size, positive lymph node metastasis, positive distant metastasis, and advanced TNM (tumor-node-metastases) stage in human cancers. Conclusion:There is a significant correlation between up-regulation of GHET1 and both poor prognosis and advanced clinicopathological cancer characteristics. GHET1 may be a potential prognostic predictor for human cancers.

SUBMITTER: Wang D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7137500 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA GHET1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang Dingding D   Zhang Hong H   Fang Xiaolian X   Zhang Xue X   Liu Honggang H  

Cancer cell international 20200407


<h4>Background</h4>A number of studies have demonstrated the critical role of long non-coding RNA gastric cancer high expressed transcript 1 (GHET1) in many cancers. This meta-analysis provides an evidence-based evaluation of the prognostic role of GHET1 in cancer.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Literature searches were conducted in several databases including Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4193855 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5762581 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7478608 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8514773 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5725038 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9773142 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7271165 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5464649 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8761471 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8270596 | biostudies-literature