Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of Long Non-coding RNA MIAT in Human Cancers: A Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT: Background: Although the treatment of cancer has made evident progress, its morbidity and mortality are still high. A tumor marker is a critical indicator for early cancer diagnosis, and timely cancer detection can efficiently help improve the prognosis of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify novel markers associated with cancer. LncRNA myocardial infarction associated transcript (MIAT) is a newly identified tumor marker, and in this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between MIAT and clinicopathological features and patient prognosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 2020 to identify correlational studies. Then, we extracted valid data and used Stata software to make forest plots. We used the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI to evaluate the relationship between aberrant expression of MIAT and patients' prognosis and clinicopathological features. Results: The study included 21 studies, containing 2,048 patients. Meta-analysis showed that overexpression of lncRNA MIAT was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.60, 95% CI, 1.31–1.96, p < 0.001). In addition, high expression of MIAT could forecast tumor size (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.34–3.81, p = 0.002), distant metastasis (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.84–3.50, p < 0.001), TNM stage (OR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.36–4.18, p = 0.002), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.25–5.36, p = 0.011), and the degree of differentiation (OR = 2.65, 95% CI 1.54–4.58, p < 0.001). However, other clinicopathological features, including age (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.87–1.32, p = 0.516), gender (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.77–1.19, p = 0.668), and histology (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.48–1.10, p = 0.128) were not significantly different from high expression of MIAT. Conclusions: Our study showed that overexpression of MIAT is related to poor overall survival and clinicopathological features. MIAT can be considered a novel tumor marker to help diagnose tumors earlier and improve patient prognosis.

SUBMITTER: Wang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8514773 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Long non-coding RNA PANDAR is an emerging non-coding RNA mapping to 6p21.2. It underlies metastatic progression and chromosomal instability in a variety of cancers. Despite the fact that recent studies have revealed that lncRNA PANDAR may be a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with cancer, there has still been controversy on the prognostic value of PANDAR. Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, SinoMed, and Web of Science were carefully searched and the literature which investigated the prognostic value of PANDAR expression among human cancers was collected for further analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) or hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to estimate the relation between PANDAR expression and survival or clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients. Results: There were 13 eligible studies in total, with 1,465 patients enlisted in this meta-analysis. All the eligible studies complied with the case-control study. The outcome showed that the elevated expression level of PANDAR was significantly related to poor overall survival (OS) (pooled HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.14-2.60). However, high or low expression of PANDAR did not differ in the prediction of event-free survival (EFS). Moreover, we discovered that high PANDAR expression was closely related to decreased OS in colorectal cancer (pooled HR 3.43, 95%CI 2.06-5.72) and reduced expression level of PANDAR was markedly related to poor OS (pooled HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.45-0.88) in non-small cell lung cancer. However, the expression level of PANDAR had no significant association with OS in renal cell carcinoma (pooled HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.56-2.50). Moreover, after analysis, we discovered that the high expression level of PANDAR was associated closely with the depth of invasion (pooled OR 3.95, 95%CI 2.36-6.63), lymph node metastasis (pooled OR 1.92, 95%CI 0.93-3.98), tumor stage (pooled OR 2.05, 95%CI 0.99-4.27), and distant metastasis (pooled OR 2.87, 95%CI 1.60-5.16). Conclusions: Our study revealed that increased PANDAR expression may serve as an adverse prognostic biomarker for cancer patients, thus helping the clinical decision-making process.

Project description:Recently, increasing studies suggested that lncRNA SNHG12 was aberrantly expressed in kinds of cancers. However, definite prognostic value of SNHG12 remains unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the association between SNHG12 expression level and cancer prognosis. A literature retrieval was conducted by searching kinds of databases. The meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software. Besides, The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset was analyzed to validate the results in our meta-analysis via using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis. The pooled results showed that high SNHG12 expression significantly indicated worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Tumor type, sample size, survival analysis method, and cutoff value did not alter SNHG12 prognosis value according to stratified analysis results. Additionally, higher expression of SNHG12 suggested unfavorable clinicopathological outcomes including larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and advanced clinical stage. Online cross-validation in TCGA dataset further indicated that cancer patients with upregulated SNHG12 expression had worse overall survival and disease-free survival. Therefore, elevated SNHG12 expression was associated with poor survival and unfavorable clinical outcomes in various cancers, and therefore might be a potential prognostic biomarker in human cancers. Abbreviations Akt: protein kinase B; CESC: cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma; ceRNA: competitive endogenous RNA; CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure; CI: confidence interval; CCNE1: cyclin E1; COAD: colon adenocarcinoma; DM: distant metastasis; DFS: disease-free survival; EMT: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization; FIGO: the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; GEPIA: Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis; HR: hazard ratio; HIFα: hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α; KIRC: kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; KIRP: kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; LIHC: hepatocellular carcinoma; LNM: lymph node metastasis; mTOR: mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase; MMP-9: matrix metalloproteinase 9; MCL1: myeloid cell leukemia 1; MLK3: mixed-lineage protein kinase 3; N/A: not available; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; OR: odd ratio; OS: overall survival; PSA: prostate-specific antigen; PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase; qRT-PCR: quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; READ: rectum adenocarcinoma; RFS: recurrence-free survival; SARC: sarcoma; SNHG12: small nucleolar RNA host gene 12; STAT3: signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; SOX4: SRY-box transcription factor 4; SOX5: SRY-box transcription factor 5; STAD: stomach adenocarcinoma; TCGA: The Cancer Genome Atlas; TNM: tumor node metastasis; WWP1: WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1; WHO grade: World Health Organization grade; ZEB2: zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2.

Project description:BackgroundThe aberrant regulation of MALAT1 has been indicated to be involved in various carcinogenic pathways contributing to the tumourigenesis and progression of cancers. The current meta-analysis summarized the research advances of MALAT1 functions and analyzed its prognostic value among multiple types of cancers.MethodsEligible studies were identified through retrieving the PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases, up to Mar 1, 2018. 28 studies of 5436 patients and 36 studies of 3325 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis to evaluate the association of MALAT1 expression with survival outcomes and clinical parameters.ResultsThe results demonstrated that over-expression of MALAT1 may predict lymph node metastasis (pooled OR = 2.335, 95% CI 1.606-3.395, P = 0.000) and distant metastasis (pooled OR = 2.456, 95% CI 1.407-4.286, P = 0.002). Moreover, MALAT1 was also related with tumour size (pooled OR = 1.875, 95% CI 1.257-2.795, P = 0.002) and TNM stage (pooled OR = 2.034, 95% CI 1.111-3.724, P = 0.021). Additionally, elevated MALAT1 expression could predict poor OS (pooled HR = 2.298, 95% CI 1.953-2.704, P = 0.000), DFS (pooled HR = 2.036, 95% CI 1.240-3.342, P = 0.005), RFS (pooled HR = 2.491, 95% CI 1.505-4.123, P = 0.000), DSS (pooled HR = 2.098, 95% CI 1.372-3.211, P = 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.842, 95% CI 1.138-2.983, P = 0.013) in multivariate model. Importantly, subgroup analyses disclosed that increased MALAT1 expression had a poor OS among different cancer types (Estrogen-dependent cancer: pooled HR = 2.656, 95% CI 1.560-4.523; urological cancer: pooled HR = 1.952, 95% CI 1.189-3.204; glioma: pooled HR = 2.315, 95% CI 1.643-3.263; digestive cancer: pooled HR = 2.451, 95% CI 1.862-3.227).ConclusionsThe present findings demonstrated that MALAT1 may be a novel biomarker for predicting survival outcome, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

Dataset Information

Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of Long Non-coding RNA MIAT in Human Cancers: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets