Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

22 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Building three-dimensional models before destructive sampling of bioarchaeological remains: a comment to Palsdottir et al. (2019).

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Evin A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7137960 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Comment on Brocklehurst et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6408402 | biostudies-literature

Feng et al 2019 - Microarray Raw Data

Project description:In order to identify mechanisms of drug resistance to HER2-targeted therapy, we performed cDNA microarray analysis on drug naiive BT474 and drug resistant BT474 cells treated with lapatinib for 0, 10, and 20 hrs.

2020-04-14 | GSE136304 | GEO

Comment on the publication of Amiryousefi et al. (2017).

Project description:This announcement describes corrections and comments to the paper entitled 'The plastid genome sequence of the invasive plant common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Asteraceae)' by A Amiryousefi, J Hyvönen, P Poczai.

| S-EPMC7800051 | biostudies-literature

Reply to comment by Kienle <i>et al</i>. 2017.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5627218 | biostudies-literature

Authors' reply to the comment from Benavides-Zora et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10311869 | biostudies-literature

Comment on Silber et al.: Aggressive treatment styles and surgical outcomes.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC3029845 | biostudies-literature

Not a limitless resource: ethics and guidelines for destructive sampling of archaeofaunal remains.

Project description:With the advent of ancient DNA, as well as other methods such as isotope analysis, destructive sampling of archaeofaunal remains has increased much faster than the effort to collect and curate them. While there has been considerable discussion regarding the ethics of destructive sampling and analysis of human remains, this dialogue has not extended to archaeofaunal material. Here we address this gap and discuss the ethical challenges surrounding destructive sampling of materials from archaeofaunal collections. We suggest ways of mitigating the negative aspects of destructive sampling and present step-by-step guidelines aimed at relevant stakeholders, including scientists, holding institutions and scientific journals. Our suggestions are in most cases easily implemented without significant increases in project costs, but with clear long-term benefits in the preservation and use of zooarchaeological material.

| S-EPMC6837180 | biostudies-literature

Response to letter to editor: 'Comment on Arch et al., Trials. 2016;17:517'.

Project description:In October 2015 we published the paper 'Measurement of HbA1c in multicentre diabetes trials - should blood samples be tested locally or sent to a central laboratory: an agreement analysis'. Chatterjee and Pradhan have submitted a letter to the editor asking critical questions regarding the methods we used. We offer this letter in response. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Eudract No. 2010-023792-25. Registered on 4 November 2010. ISRCTN No. ISRCTN29255275 . Registered on 12 November 2010.

| S-EPMC5446760 | biostudies-literature

Scaling of swim speed in sharks: a comment on Jacoby et al. (2015).

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5014018 | biostudies-literature

Fibromyalgia criteria and anomalous results: comment on the article by Ghavidel-Parsa et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9274344 | biostudies-literature