Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.


ABSTRACT: Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) is now accepted as a murine model that better mimics human cancer when compared to a conventional cancer cell-line inoculation model. Some claim the advantage of orthotopic site implantation of patient tumor (OS) over ectopic implantation into the subcutaneous space (SQ); however, there has been no study that describes a head-to-head comparison of oncological differences between these two models to date. We hypothesize that OS tumors re-transplant and grow better than SQ tumors and are therefore a better model to evaluate tumor aggressiveness. Breast cancer PDXs were generated using the tumors derived from 11 patients into NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice. We used six ER(+)HER2(-) tumors and five triple negative (TN) tumors for a total of 11 tumors. Five PDX lines grew for an overall engraftment rate of 45%. We present our OS implantation method in detail. The re-transplantation rate of TN tumors in each transplant site was significantly higher in OS when compared to SQ tumors (70.1% vs. 32.1%, p?

SUBMITTER: Okano M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7141774 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Okano Maiko M   Oshi Masanori M   Butash Ali A   Okano Ichiro I   Saito Katsuharu K   Kawaguchi Tsutomu T   Nagahashi Masayuki M   Kono Koji K   Ohtake Toru T   Takabe Kazuaki K  

Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia 20200227 1


Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) is now accepted as a murine model that better mimics human cancer when compared to a conventional cancer cell-line inoculation model. Some claim the advantage of orthotopic site implantation of patient tumor (OS) over ectopic implantation into the subcutaneous space (SQ); however, there has been no study that describes a head-to-head comparison of oncological differences between these two models to date. We hypothesize that OS tumors re-transplant and grow better  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5659286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10670432 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7506024 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10956311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4480696 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7360541 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4299502 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7808565 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7903462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8865695 | biostudies-literature