Dataset Information

Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipoprotein subfractions and size in 15,397 apparently healthy individuals: An analysis from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Elevated postprandial triglycerides reflect a proatherogenic milieu, but underlying mechanisms are unclear.

Objective

We examined differences between fasting and nonfasting profiles of directly measured lipoprotein size and subfractions to assess if postprandial triglycerides reflected increases in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and remnants, or small dense lipid depleted LDL (sdLDL) particles.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 15,397 participants (10,135 fasting; 5262 nonfasting [<8 hours since last meal]) from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL. Baseline cholesterol subfractions were measured by the vertical auto profile method and particle subfractions by ion mobility. We performed multivariable linear regression adjusting for cardiovascular and lipoprotein-modifying risk factors.

Results

Mean age (SD) was 68.0 years (±7.0), with 50.9% women. Adjusted mean triglyceride concentrations were higher nonfasting by 17.8 ± 1.3%, with higher nonfasting levels of directly measured VLDL cholesterol (by 3.5 ± 0.6%) and total VLDL particles (by 2.0 ± 0.7%), specifically large VLDL (by 12.3 ± 1.3%) and medium VLDL particles (by 5.3 ± 0.8%), all P < .001. By contrast, lower concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) and IDL cholesterol and particles were noted for nonfasting participants. sdLDL cholesterol levels and particle concentrations showed no statistically significant difference by fasting status (-1.3 ± 2.1% and 0.07 ± 0.6%, respectively, P > .05).

Conclusions

Directly measured particle and cholesterol concentrations of VLDL, not sdLDL, were higher nonfasting and may partly contribute to the proatherogenicity of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia. These differences, although statistically significant, were small and may not fully explain the increased risk of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia.

SUBMITTER: Farukhi ZM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7166180 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar - Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipoprotein subfractions and size in 15,397 apparently healthy individuals: An analysis from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL.

Farukhi Zareen M ZM Demler Olga V OV Caulfield Michael P MP Kulkarni Krishnaji K Wohlgemuth Jay J Cobble Michael M Luttmann-Gibson Heike H Li Chunying C Nelson John R JR Cook Nancy R NR Buring Julie E JE Krauss Ronald M RM Manson JoAnn E JE Mora Samia S

Journal of clinical lipidology 20200221 2

<h4>Background</h4>Elevated postprandial triglycerides reflect a proatherogenic milieu, but underlying mechanisms are unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>We examined differences between fasting and nonfasting profiles of directly measured lipoprotein size and subfractions to assess if postprandial triglycerides reflected increases in very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and remnants, or small dense lipid depleted LDL (sdLDL) particles.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a c ...[more]

PMID: 32205068

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Compare gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE), vertical auto profile ultracentrifugation (VAP-II), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), and ion mobility for their ability to relate low- (LDL), intermediate- (IDL), very-low-density (VLDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfraction concentrations to atherosclerotic progression. METHODS AND RESULTS:Regression analyses of 136 patients who received baseline and follow-up coronary angiographies and subfraction measurements by all four methods in the HDL Atherosclerosis Treatment Study. Prior analyses have shown that the intervention primarily affected disease progression in proximal arteries with <30% stenoses at baseline. Three-year increases in percent stenoses were consistently associated with higher on-study plasma concentrations of small, dense LDL as measured by GGE (LDLIIIb, P=10(-6); LDLIVa, P=0.006; LDLIVb, P=0.02), VAP-II (LDL4, P=0.002), NMR (small LDL, P=0.001), and ion mobility (LDL IIb, P=0.04; LDLIIIa, P=0.002; LDLIIIb, P=0.0007; LDLIVa, P=0.05). Adjustment for triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol failed to eliminate the statistical significance for on-study GGE estimated LDLIIIb (P=10(-5)) and LDLIVa (P=0.04); NMR-estimated small LDL (P=0.03); or ion mobility estimated large VLDL (P=0.02), LDLIIIa (P=0.04) or LDLIIIb (P=0.02). All methods show that the effects were significantly greater for the on-study than the baseline small, dense LDL concentrations, thus establishing that the values concurrent to the progression of disease were responsible. The rate of disease progression was also related to individual VLDL, IDL, and HDL subclasses to differing extents among the various analytic methods. CONCLUSION:Four methodologies confirm the association of small, dense LDL with greater coronary atherosclerosis progression, and GGE, NMR, and ion mobility confirm that the associations were independent of standard lipid measurements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00000553.

Dataset Information

Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipoprotein subfractions and size in 15,397 apparently healthy individuals: An analysis from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of nonfasting and fasting lipoprotein subfractions and size in 15,397 apparently healthy individuals: An analysis from the VITamin D and OmegA-3 TriaL.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets