Dataset Information

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

ABSTRACT: Our objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in order to evaluate the currently recommended dosing regimen in term and preterm neonates. By using an optimal design approach, a prospective PK study was designed and implemented in 60 neonates with postmenstrual ages (PMA) of 26 to 43 weeks. A loading dose of 16?mg/kg was administered at day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 8?mg/kg daily. Plasma concentrations were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Population PK (popPK) analysis was performed using NONMEM software. Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations were performed to evaluate currently recommended dosing based on a pharmacodynamic index of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC?ratio of ?400. A two-compartment model with linear elimination best described the data by the following equations: clearance (CL) = 0.0227 × (weight [wt]/1,765)0.75 × (estimated creatinine clearance [eCRCL]/22)0.672, central compartment volume of distribution (V1) = 0.283 (wt/1,765), intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.151 (wt/1,765)0.75, and peripheral compartment volume (V2) = 0.541 (wt/1,765). The interindividual variability estimates for CL, V1, and V2 were 36.5%, 45.7%, and 51.4%, respectively. Current weight (wt) and estimated creatinine clearance (eCRCL) significantly explained the observed variability. MC simulation demonstrated that, with the current dosing regimen, an AUC/MIC?ratio of ?400 was reached by only 68.5% of neonates with wt of <1 kg when the MIC?was equal to?1 mg/kg, versus 82.2%, 89.7%, and 92.7% of neonates with wt of 1 to <2, 2 to <3, or ?3?kg, respectively. Augmentation of a maintenance dose up to 10 or 11?mg/kg for preterm neonates with wt of 1 to <2 or <1?kg, respectively, increases the probability of reaching the therapeutic target; the recommended doses seem to be adequate for neonates with wt of ?2?kg. Teicoplanin PK are variable in neonates, with wt and eCRCL having the most significant impact. Neonates with wt of?<2 kg need higher doses, especially for Staphylococcus spp. with an MIC?value of ?1 mg/liter.

SUBMITTER: Kontou A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7179285 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Kontou A A Sarafidis K K Begou O O Gika H G HG Tsiligiannis A A Ogungbenro K K Dokoumetzidis A A Agakidou E E Roilides E E

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20200324 4

Our objective was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in order to evaluate the currently recommended dosing regimen in term and preterm neonates. By using an optimal design approach, a prospective PK study was designed and implemented in 60 neonates with postmenstrual ages (PMA) of 26 to 43 weeks. A loading dose of 16 mg/kg was administered at day 1, followed by a maintenance dose of 8 mg/kg daily. Plasma concentrations were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography-mass s ...[more]

PMID: 31932366

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: The pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin differs in children compared with adults. Our aim was to determine the PK of teicoplanin in an Asian pediatric population and to optimize dosage regimens. Methods: This was a retrospective PK study and all the data were collected from hospitalized children. We developed a population PK model using sparse data, and Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the ability of standard teicoplanin regimen and other different dosage regimens. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target trough concentration (C min) of 10 mg/L and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD, [AUC24/MIC]) of 125 for moderate infection. For severe infection, the optimal dosing regimens were defined as achieving the target 15 mg/L and AUC24/MIC of 345. Results: 159 children were included and 1.5 samples/children on average were provided. Estimated clearance of teicoplanin was 0.694 L/h (0.784/L/h/70 kg) and volume of distribution was 1.39 L. Teicoplanin standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection, while 13 mg/kg was needed for severer infection. With standard maintenance doses, both patients with moderate and severe infection failed to achieve the target C min. 12 and 16 mg/kg/day were required to achieve a C min ≥ 10 and 15 mg/L, respectively. However, standard maintenance dose was adequate to achieve AUC24/MIC ≥ 125 for moderate infection, and 12 mg/kg/day was needed to achieve AUC24/MIC ≥ 345 for severe infection. Lower weight and serum creatinine were associated with higher dose. Conclusion: Optimal doses based on the target C min were higher than that based on the PK/PD target. To achieve the C min and PK/PD targets simultaneously, a standard loading dose was adequate for moderate infection based on simulation, while dosing higher than standard doses were required in other situation. Further clinical studies with rich sampling from children is required to confirm our findings.

Project description:Group B streptococci are common causative agents of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS). Pharmacokinetic (PK) data for penicillin G have been described for extremely preterm neonates but have been poorly described for late-preterm and term neonates. Thus, evidence-based dosing recommendations are lacking. We describe the PK of penicillin G in neonates with a gestational age (GA) of ?32 weeks and a postnatal age of <72 h. Penicillin G was administered intravenously at a dose of 25,000 or 50,000 IU/kg of body weight every 12 h (q12h). At steady state, PK blood samples were collected prior to and at 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, 8 h, and 12 h after injection. Noncompartmental PK analysis was performed with WinNonlin software. With those data in combination with data from neonates with a GA of ?28 weeks, we developed a population PK model using NONMEM software and performed probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations. In total, 16 neonates with a GA of ?32 weeks were included in noncompartmental analysis. The median volume of distribution (V) was 0.50 liters/kg (interquartile range, 0.42 to 0.57 liters/kg), the median clearance (CL) was 0.21 liters/h (interquartile range, 0.16 to 0.29 liters/kg), and the median half-life was 3.6 h (interquartile range, 3.2 to 4.3 h). In the population PK analysis that included 35 neonates, a two-compartment model best described the data. The final parameter estimates were 10.3 liters/70 kg and 29.8 liters/70 kg for V of the central and peripheral compartments, respectively, and 13.2 liters/h/70 kg for CL. Considering the fraction of unbound penicillin G to be 40%, the PTA of an unbound drug concentration that exceeds the MIC for 40% of the dosing interval was >90% for MICs of ?2 mg/liter with doses of 25,000 IU/kg q12h. In neonates, regardless of GA, the PK parameters of penicillin G were similar. The dose of 25,000 IU/kg q12h is suggested for treatment of group B streptococcal EOS diagnosed within the first 72 h of life. (This study was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register under EudraCT number 2012-002836-97.).

Project description:Objectives: Teicoplanin has been extensively used in the treatment for infections caused by gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, current teicoplanin treatment is challenging due to relatively low and variable concentrations under standard dosage regimens. This study aimed to investigate the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) characteristics of teicoplanin in adult sepsis patients and provide recommendations for optimal teicoplanin dosing regimens. Methods: A total of 249 serum concentration samples from 59 septic patients were prospectively collected in the intensive care unit (ICU). Teicoplanin concentrations were detected, and patients' clinical data were recorded. PPK analysis was performed using a non-linear, mixed-effect modeling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate currently recommended dosing and other dosage regimens. The optimal dosing regimens were defined and compared by different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, including trough concentration (Cmin), the ratio of 24-h area under the concentration-time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC), as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against MRSA. Results: A two-compartment model adequately described the data. The final model parameter estimates for clearance, central compartment volume of distribution, intercompartmental clearance and peripheral compartment volume were 1.03 L/h, 20.1 L, 3.12 L/h and 101 L, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was the only covariate that significantly affected teicoplanin clearance. Model-based simulations revealed that 3 or 5 loading doses of 12/15 mg/kg every 12 h followed by a maintenance dose of 12/15 mg/kg every 24 h-72 h for patients with different renal functions were required to achieve a target Cmin of 15 mg/L and a target AUC0-24/MIC of 610. For MRSA infections, PTAs and CFRs were not satisfactory for simulated regimens. Prolonging the dosing interval may be easier to achieve the target AUC0-24/MIC than reducing the unit dose for renal insufficient patients. Conclusion: A PPK model for teicoplanin in adult septic patients was successfully developed. Model-based simulations revealed that current standard doses may result in undertherapeutic Cmin and AUC, and a single dose of at least 12 mg/kg may be needed. AUC0-24/MIC should be preferred as the PK/PD indicator of teicoplanin, if AUC estimation is unavailable, in addition to routine detection of teicoplanin Cmin on Day 4, follow-up therapeutic drug monitoring at steady-state is recommended.

Project description:Teicoplanin is frequently administered to treat Gram-positive infections in pediatric patients. However, not enough is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teicoplanin in children to justify the optimal dosing regimen. The aim of this study was to determine the population PK of teicoplanin in children and evaluate the current dosage regimens. A PK hospital-based study was conducted. Current dosage recommendations were used for children up to 16 years of age. Thirty-nine children were recruited. Serum samples were collected at the first dose interval (1, 3, 6, and 24 h) and at steady state. A standard 2-compartment PK model was developed, followed by structural models that incorporated weight. Weight was allowed to affect clearance (CL) using linear and allometric scaling terms. The linear model best accounted for the observed data and was subsequently chosen for Monte Carlo simulations. The PK parameter medians/means (standard deviation [SD]) were as follows: CL, [0.019/0.023 (0.01)] × weight liters/h/kg of body weight; volume, 2.282/4.138 liters (4.14 liters); first-order rate constant from the central to peripheral compartment (Kcp), 0.474/3.876 h(-1) (8.16 h(-1)); and first-order rate constant from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc), 0.292/3.994 h(-1) (8.93 h(-1)). The percentage of patients with a minimum concentration of drug in serum (Cmin) of <10 mg/liter was 53.85%. The median/mean (SD) total population area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 619/527.05 mg · h/liter (166.03 mg · h/liter). Based on Monte Carlo simulations, only 30.04% (median AUC, 507.04 mg · h/liter), 44.88% (494.1 mg · h/liter), and 60.54% (452.03 mg · h/liter) of patients weighing 50, 25, and 10 kg, respectively, attained trough concentrations of >10 mg/liter by day 4 of treatment. The teicoplanin population PK is highly variable in children, with a wider AUC distribution spread than for adults. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be a routine requirement to minimize suboptimal concentrations. (This trial has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database Registry [EudraCT] under registration number 2012-005738-12.).

Dataset Information

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Publications

Population Pharmacokinetics of Teicoplanin in Preterm and Term Neonates: Is It Time for a New Dosing Regimen?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets