Re-irradiation for oligoprogression under Nivolumab in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A case report.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bonomo P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7186263 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Re-irradiation for oligoprogression under Nivolumab in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A case report.
Bonomo Pierluigi P Lucidi Sara S Desideri Isacco I Scotti Vieri V Casati Marta M Palomba Annarita A Ciabatti Cinzia C Garlatti Pietro P Massi Daniela D Gallo Oreste O Livi Lorenzo L
Clinical and translational radiation oncology 20200417
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a recently introduced class of agents active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For a subgroup of patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, long-term benefit can be achieved: maintaining a sustained response to immunotherapy is therefore a critical factor for its efficacy at an individual level. In analogy to targeted agents, a limited pattern of progression, or "oligoprogression", can occur. For locally recurrent HNSCC, the poten ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe rate of loco-regional recurrences for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) following standard treatment reaches up to 50%, accompanied by a probability of 20% to develop a second primary tumor in the head and neck region.MethodsTen patients with inoperable, in-field recurrence of HNSCC following previous primary or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in combination with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy were re-irradiated with 60 Gray in 30 fractions between December 2017 and January 2020 with concurrent and maintenance nivolumab administration. Data were retrospectively collected and compared with patients who underwent re-irradiation (ReRT) with concurrent cisplatin following propensity score matching (PSM). Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) were visualized using Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test).ResultsAll patients completed ReRT. Median number of applied courses of nivolumab was 12 (range, 3-38). OS rate was 50% at 12 months and the median OS was 11 (range, 2-23) months. Six and 12 month LPFS rates were 60% and 30%, respectively. Median LPFS was 8 (range, 2-19) months. OS and LPFS rates were not inferior to those of patients treated with concurrent cisplatin. No unexpected radiation-related toxicity occurred. A total of four patients developed any-grade immune-related adverse events of which two presented with grade 3 toxicities. One patient died within 3 weeks after ReRT. Higher blood levels of CRP (p = 0.004), lower levels of hemoglobin (p = 0.029) and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.004) were associated with impaired LPFS. Higher recursive portioning analysis (RPA) class was associated with impaired LPFS (p = 0.022) and OS (p = 0.024).ConclusionThe combination of ReRT and nivolumab for locally recurrent HNSCC was feasible without occurrence of unexpected toxicities. Combined radioimmunotherapy might offer an effective treatment option for carefully selected pre-irradiated patients ineligible for salvage surgery.
| S-EPMC8050105 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck after platinum chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, was assessed as treatment for this condition. METHODS:In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 361 patients with recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck whose disease had progressed within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 2 weeks or standard, single-agent systemic therapy (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). The primary end point was overall survival. Additional end points included progression-free survival, rate of objective response, safety, and patient-reported quality of life. RESULTS:The median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 9.1) in the nivolumab group versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.0) in the group that received standard therapy. Overall survival was significantly longer with nivolumab than with standard therapy (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 97.73% CI, 0.51 to 0.96; P=0.01), and the estimates of the 1-year survival rate were approximately 19 percentage points higher with nivolumab than with standard therapy (36.0% vs. 16.6%). The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.1) with nivolumab versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.1) with standard therapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.13; P=0.32). The rate of progression-free survival at 6 months was 19.7% with nivolumab versus 9.9% with standard therapy. The response rate was 13.3% in the nivolumab group versus 5.8% in the standard-therapy group. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 13.1% of the patients in the nivolumab group versus 35.1% of those in the standard-therapy group. Physical, role, and social functioning was stable in the nivolumab group, whereas it was meaningfully worse in the standard-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, treatment with nivolumab resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with standard, single-agent therapy. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 141 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02105636 .).
| S-EPMC5564292 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTreatment options for patients with platinum-refractory, recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/m HNSCC) are limited and prognosis is poor. The recent CheckMate 141 clinical trial demonstrated that nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody, was efficacious in extending the median overall survival (OS) in this patient population compared with standard therapies. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine whether nivolumab is a cost-effective treatment in this patient population and examined various subgroups to determine for which, if any, the treatment is more cost-effective.Materials and methodsWe implemented a state transition model for HNSCC with a patient cohort who had tumor progression 6 months after the last dose of platinum-containing chemotherapy and compared the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab with docetaxel. Treatment effect estimates and adverse event rates were obtained from CheckMate 141. Costs, utilities, and other model inputs were gathered from published sources. We used a Canadian perspective, a 5-year time horizon, and a 1.5% discount rate for the analysis.ResultsNivolumab extended mean OS by 4 months compared with docetaxel and resulted in fewer treatment-related adverse events, producing an incremental effectiveness of 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The incremental cost of treatment with nivolumab was $18,823. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY, nivolumab was not a cost-effective treatment option for r/m HNSCC, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $144,744/QALY. Nivolumab would be cost-effective if its price was reduced by 20%. Our subgroup analysis seemed to indicate that nivolumab might be cost-effective for tumors with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 >5%.ConclusionWe conclude that although nivolumab offers clinical benefit for the treatment of r/m HNSCC over current regimens, it is not cost-effective based on its list price. We have also established a value-based price estimate for nivolumab to be cost-effective in this patient population. Further study is required to draw a definitive conclusion on biomarkers for cost-effectiveness.Implications for practiceIn health care settings in which cost considerations are a constraint on choice of therapy, patient selection should be carefully considered to maintain efficiency in the system. Until a biomarker for response to therapy is identified for nivolumab, this medication is unlikely to be cost-effective for most patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
| S-EPMC5813741 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In an immune-competent context nivolumab showed long-term benefit in overall survival in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, in special cancer population such as these patients with immunodeficiency and viral infections, data on checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) activity are scant. Herein, we report a patient with a Human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and CD4 lymphocytopenia. After a first-line treatment complete remission, the patient experienced Human Polyomavirus (JCV) infection in the brain. Consequently, to the recovery from progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) the patient metastasized and was enrolled in a single-arm trial with nivolumab (EudraCT number: 2017-000562-30). A complete and durable response (more 3 years) was observed after 10 nivolumab injections Q2wks, interrupted for persistent drug related G2 diarrhea and a syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. We describe the circulating immune profile (before-, during-, and after nivolumab), consistent with the clinical history. Moreover, during nivolumab treatment, brain MRI evidenced the presence of small punctuate areas of contrast enhancement, reflecting a mild immune response in perivascular spaces. By cytofluorimetry, we observed that during JCV infection the CD4/CD8 ratio of the patient was under the normal values. After JCV infection recovery and before nivolumab treatment, CD4/CD8 ratio reached the normality threshold, even if the CD4+ T cell count remained largely under the normal values. During ICI, gene expression xCell analyses of circulating immune cells of the patient, showed a progressive normalization of the total immune profile, with significant boost in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and a reduction in NK T, comparable to the circulating immune profile of reference tumor-free HNSCC patients. The present case supports the activity of ICI in a population of special cancer patients; whether JCV and HPV infections (alone or together) might have a possible role as immune booster(s), require further investigations.
| S-EPMC8784387 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Treatment for local and locoregional recurrence or second head-and-neck (H&N) cancers after previous radiotherapy is challenging, and re-irradiation carries a significantly increased risk for radiotherapy-related normal tissue toxicities and treatment failure due to a radioresistant tumor phenotype. Here, we analyzed re-irradiation management and outcomes in patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma using state-of-the-art diagnostic procedures and radiotherapy techniques. METHODS:Between 2010 and 2019, 48 patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma received re-radiotherapy at the University of Freiburg Medical Center and were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of clinico-pathological factors on treatment outcomes. Acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.03). RESULTS:Thirty-one patients (64.6%) received definitive and 17 (35.4%) adjuvant radiotherapy. Simultaneous chemotherapy was administered in 28 patients (58.3%) with cetuximab as the most commonly used systemic agent (n =?17, 60.7%). After a median time of 17?months (range 4?months to 176?months) between first and second radiotherapy, patients were re-irradiated with a median of 58.4?Gy and a treatment completion rate of 87.5% (n =?42). Median OS was 25?months with a 1-year OS amounting to 62.4%, and median PFS was 9?months with a 1-year PFS of 37.6%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that both a lower rT-status and a radiotherapy boost were associated with improved OS (p <?0.05). There was a trend towards superior OS for patients who received >?50?Gy (p =?0.091) and who completed the prescribed radiotherapy (p =?0.055). Five patients (10.4%) suffered from at least one grade 3 toxicities, while 9 patients (27.3%) experienced chronic higher-grade toxicities (? grade 3) with one (3.0%) grade 4 carotid blowout and one (3.0%) grade 4 osteoradionecrosis. CONCLUSION:Re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary H&N cancer with modern radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy resulted in promising survival rates with acceptable toxicities compared to historical cohorts. Increased re-irradiation doses, utilization of a radiotherapy boost and completion of the re-irradiation treatment were found to result in improved survival.
| S-EPMC7164259 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recent studies have suggested the benefit of salvage chemotherapy (SCT) after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We retrospectively examined the outcome of SCT and the usefulness of the serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as prognostic biomarkers. Thirty-nine patients with R/M HNSCC were enrolled in this study. Twenty-five patients (64.1%) received combination chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab (PC) as SCT, and 14 patients (35.9%) received tegafur-gimestat-otastat potassium (S1), an oral fluoropyrimidine. In all patients, the response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 45.2%, 85.7%, 6.5 months, and 13.5 months, respectively. No chemotherapy-related deaths were observed. These PC groups had low CRP (<1.2 mg/dL) or low NLR (<7.0) values at the time of SCT induction, which was significantly associated with an improved OS (p = 0.0440, p = 0.0354). A multivariate analysis also showed that a lower CRP value was significantly associated with a better OS (p = 0.0078). We clarified the usefulness of the PC and S1 regimens as SCT. In addition, SCT with the PC regimen showed a better prognosis with a lower CRP or NLR at induction than a higher CRP or NLR. This is the first report on biomarkers of SCT in R/M HNSCC.
| S-EPMC7463840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:The CheckMate 141 trial found that nivolumab improved survival for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC). Despite the improved survival, nivolumab is much more expensive than standard therapies. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab for the treatment of HNC. Methods:We constructed a Markov model to simulate treatment with nivolumab or standard single-agent therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic platinum-refractory HNC. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and probability of toxicity, were derived from clinical trial data, while costs (in 2017?US dollars) and health utilities were estimated from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), expressed as dollar per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), were calculated, with values of less than $100?000/QALY considered cost-effective from a health care payer perspective. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess model uncertainty. Results:Our base case model found that treatment with nivolumab increased overall cost by $117?800 and improved effectiveness by 0.400 QALYs compared with standard therapy, leading to an ICER of $294?400/QALY. The model was most sensitive to the cost of nivolumab, though nivolumab only became cost-effective if the cost per cycle decreased from $13?432 to $3931. The model was not particularly sensitive to assumptions about survival. If one assumed that all patients alive at the end of the CheckMate 141 trial were cured of their disease, nivolumab was still not cost-effective (ICER $244?600/QALY). Conclusion:While nivolumab improves overall survival, at its current cost it would not be considered a cost-effective treatment option for patients with HNC.
| S-EPMC5946900 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionThe abscopal effect is a rarely observed outcome of radiotherapy wherein there is a reduction in metastatic disease burden outside of the targeted treatment area. Likely due to an in situ vaccine effect of radiotherapy, the abscopal effect may be augmented by immunotherapy. This report is the first case of the abscopal effect observed in metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc) treated with concurrent radiotherapy and single-agent nivolumab.Case descriptionAn otherwise healthy 57-year-old man underwent craniofacial resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Distant metastatic disease developed shortly after primary treatment, and immunotherapy in the form of nivolumab was initiated. Subsequent oligometastatic progression despite immunotherapy prompted palliative radiotherapy to a single metastasis due to pending symptomatology. Post-radiotherapy, the abscopal effect was observed with all distant sites of metastatic disease shrinking. Five months following treatment, a sustained reduction in disease burden has been demonstrated.SummaryWe present the first case of the abscopal effect in a patient with metastatic hnscc treated with palliative radiotherapy concurrent with single-agent nivolumab immunotherapy, and only the third case of the abscopal effect in metastatic head-and-neck cancer. Dual treatment with immunotherapy and radiotherapy may be an important treatment option in the future, mediated through the abscopal effect.
| S-EPMC7755449 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although several prognostic factors in nivolumab therapy have been reported in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC) patients, these factors remain controversial. Here, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of clinico-hematological factors on survival in RM-HNC patients treated with nivolumab. We reviewed 126 RM-HNC patients from seven institutes. We evaluated the prognostic effects of clinico-hematological factors on survival. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months, and the 1 year-OS rate was 51.2%. Patients without immune-related adverse events, lower relative eosinophil count, worse best overall response, higher performance status, and higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score had worse survival. The score, generated by combining these factors, was associated with survival. Patients with score of 4-5 had worse survival than those with score of 2-3 and 0-1 [adjusted HR for PFS: score of 4-5, 7.77 (3.98-15.15); score of 2-3, 3.44 (1.95-6.06), compared to score of 0-1], [adjusted HR for OS: score of 4-5, 14.66 (4.28-50.22); score of 2-3, 7.63 (2.29-25.37), compared to score of 0-1]. Our novel prognostic score utilizing clinico-hematological factors might be useful to establish an individual treatment strategy in RM-HNC patients treated with nivolumab therapy.
| S-EPMC8379150 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although nivolumab, a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, is a standard therapy for platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), no definitive biomarkers have been reported thus far. This study aimed to select promising prognostic markers in nivolumab therapy and to create a novel prognostic scoring system. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed patients with R/M HNSCC who were treated with nivolumab from April 2017 to April 2019. We developed a prognostic score for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy that was weighed using hazard ratio-based scoring algorithms. Significant variables were selected from the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses on overall survival (OS). A total of 85 patients with HNSCC were analyzed in the present study. The relative eosinophil count (REC), the ratio of eosinophil increase (REI), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) were selected as variables affecting the prognostic score. The patients were divided into four groups: very good (score = 0), good (score = 1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor (score = 3). The OS hazard ratios were 2.77, 10.18, and 33.21 for the good, intermediate, and poor risk groups compared with the very good risk group, respectively. The Eosinophil Prognostic Score is a novel prognostic score that is effective for predicting the prognosis of HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab. This score is more precise as it includes changes in biomarkers before and after the treatment.
| S-EPMC7780035 | biostudies-literature