Dataset Information

Quantifying Mobility in the ICU: Comparison of Electronic Health Record Documentation and Accelerometer-Based Sensors to Clinician-Annotated Video.

ABSTRACT: To compare the accuracy of electronic health record clinician documentation and accelerometer-based sensors with a gold standard dataset derived from clinician-annotated video to quantify early mobility activities in adult ICU patients. Design:Prospective, observational study. Setting:Medical ICU at an academic hospital. Patients:Adult ICU patients (n = 30) were each continuously monitored over a median of 24.4 hours, yielding 711.5 hours of video, electronic health record, and sensor data. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Electronic health record documentation estimated ambulation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-0.95), sitting out-of-bed (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93), and turning events (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94) with excellent agreement but underestimated the number of standing, transferring, and pregait activities performed per patient. The accelerometer-based sensor had excellent agreement with video annotation for estimating duration of time spent supine (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; CI, 0.97-0.99) and sitting/standing upright (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92; CI, 0.82-0.96) but overestimated ambulation time. Conclusions:Our results show that electronic health record documentation and sensor-based technologies accurately capture distinct but complimentary metrics for ICU mobility measurement. Innovations in artifact detection, standardization of clinically relevant mobility definitions, and electronic health record documentation enhancements may enable further use of these technologies to drive critical care research and technology leveraged data-driven ICU models of care.

SUBMITTER: Fazio S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7188433 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantifying Mobility in the ICU: Comparison of Electronic Health Record Documentation and Accelerometer-Based Sensors to Clinician-Annotated Video.

Fazio Sarina S Doroy Amy A Da Marto Natalie N Taylor Sandra S Anderson Nicholas N Young Heather M HM Adams Jason Y JY

Critical care explorations 20200429 4

To compare the accuracy of electronic health record clinician documentation and accelerometer-based sensors with a gold standard dataset derived from clinician-annotated video to quantify early mobility activities in adult ICU patients.<h4>Design</h4>Prospective, observational study.<h4>Setting</h4>Medical ICU at an academic hospital.<h4>Patients</h4>Adult ICU patients (n = 30) were each continuously monitored over a median of 24.4 hours, yielding 711.5 hours of video, electronic health record, ...[more]

PMID: 32426733

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Documentation of information in the health record by pharmacists is vital to patient care. Failure to document, or failure to document appropriately, may have negative effects on patients. Objectives:The primary objective was to determine pharmacists' competency in 18 elements of chart note documentation at 2 tertiary care centres and 1 rehabilitation centre. The secondary objectives were to quantify the number of episodes of documentation by pharmacists, to characterize the clinical activities associated with this documentation, and to determine whether there were differences in level of competency according to years of hospital experience, additional clinical training, and note type. Methods:This study used prospective audit methodology. Notes documented during a 6-week study period (February to April 2015) were assessed using a rubric specifically created to evaluate 18 of the essential elements of documentation, as defined by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. Four of the elements of chart note documentation were assessed on a yes/no basis, and Bloom's taxonomy was used to define the level of competency for the other 14 elements. Values were assigned to each level and were then used to calculate mean scores. Results:A total of 115 pharmacist notes, created by 29 of the 35 pharmacists included in the study, were assessed. The mean competency score per pharmacist was 2.2 (standard deviation [SD] 0.3; maximum score 3). Elements of documentation with the highest level of competency were diplomatic tone, conciseness, and clarity; elements with the lowest level of competency were medication list, note title, monitoring, and drug-related problem statements. The most frequent note types concerned drug-related problems (50 [43%]), pharmacokinetics (25 [22%]), and patient education (19 [17%]). Levels of competency were highest for notes related to patient education (mean 2.4, SD 0.2) and lowest for notes concerning drug-related problems (mean 2.1, SD 0.3) and notes providing clarification (mean 2.1, SD 0.3). The level of competency was not significantly affected by additional clinical training or years of hospital experience. Conclusions:Pharmacists in this study documented concisely, clearly, and in a diplomatic tone; however, there was room for improvement in the frequency and elements of chart note documentation in the patient health record.

Project description:ImportanceElectronic health records are a potentially valuable source of information for identifying patients with opioid use disorder (OUD).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether proxy measures from electronic health record data can be used reliably to identify patients with probable OUD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) criteria.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed individuals within the Geisinger health system who were prescribed opioids between December 31, 2000, and May 31, 2017, using a mixed-methods approach. The cohort was identified from 16 253 patients enrolled in a contract-based, Geisinger-specific medication monitoring program (GMMP) for opioid use, including patients who maintained or violated contract terms, as well as a demographically matched control group of 16 253 patients who were prescribed opioids but not enrolled in the GMMP. Substance use diagnoses and psychiatric comorbidities were assessed using automated electronic health record summaries. A manual medical record review procedure using DSM-5 criteria for OUD was completed for a subset of patients. The analysis was conducted beginning from June 5, 2017, until May 29, 2020.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the prevalence of OUD as defined by proxy measures for DSM-5 criteria for OUD as well as the prevalence of comorbidities among patients prescribed opioids within an integrated health system.ResultsAmong the 16 253 patients enrolled in the GMMP (9309 women [57%]; mean [SD] age, 52 [14] years), OUD diagnoses as defined by diagnostic codes were present at a much lower rate than expected (291 [2%]), indicating the necessity for alternative diagnostic strategies. The DSM-5 criteria for OUD can be assessed using manual medical record review; a manual review of 200 patients in the GMMP and 200 control patients identifed a larger percentage of patients with probable moderate to severe OUD (GMMP, 145 of 200 [73%]; and control, 27 of 200 [14%]) compared with the prevalence of OUD assessed using diagnostic codes.Conclusions and relevanceThese results suggest that patients with OUD may be identified using information available in the electronic health record, even when diagnostic codes do not reflect this diagnosis. Furthermore, the study demonstrates the utility of coding for DSM-5 criteria from medical records to generate a quantitative DSM-5 score that is associated with OUD severity.

Project description:ImportanceDespite the benefits of goals-of-care (GOC) communication, many hospitalized individuals never communicate their goals or preferences to clinicians.ObjectiveTo assess whether a GOC video intervention delivered by palliative care educators (PCEs) increased the rate of GOC documentation.Design, setting, and participantsThis pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial included patients aged 65 years or older admitted to 1 of 14 units at 2 urban hospitals in New York and Boston from July 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022.InterventionThe intervention involved PCEs (social workers and nurses trained in GOC communication) facilitating GOC conversations with patients and/or their decision-makers using a library of brief, certified video decision aids available in 29 languages. Patients in the control period received usual care.Main outcome and measuresThe primary outcome was GOC documentation, which included any documentation of a goals conversation, limitation of life-sustaining treatment, palliative care, hospice, or time-limited trials and was obtained by natural language processing.ResultsA total of 10 802 patients (mean [SD] age, 78 [8] years; 51.6% male) were admitted to 1 of 14 hospital units. Goals-of-care documentation during the intervention phase occurred among 3744 of 6023 patients (62.2%) compared with 2396 of 4779 patients (50.1%) in the usual care phase (P < .001). Proportions of documented GOC discussions for Black or African American individuals (865 of 1376 [62.9%] vs 596 of 1125 [53.0%]), Hispanic or Latino individuals (311 of 548 [56.8%] vs 218 of 451 [48.3%]), non-English speakers (586 of 1059 [55.3%] vs 405 of 863 [46.9%]), and people living with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (520 of 681 [76.4%] vs 355 of 570 [62.3%]) were greater during the intervention phase compared with the usual care phase.Conclusions and relevanceIn this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial of older adults, a GOC video intervention delivered by PCEs resulted in higher rates of GOC documentation compared with usual care, including among Black or African American individuals, Hispanic or Latino individuals, non-English speakers, and people living with Alzheimer disease and related dementias. The findings suggest that this form of patient-centered care delivery may be a beneficial decision support tool.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04857060.

Dataset Information

Quantifying Mobility in the ICU: Comparison of Electronic Health Record Documentation and Accelerometer-Based Sensors to Clinician-Annotated Video.

Publications

Quantifying Mobility in the ICU: Comparison of Electronic Health Record Documentation and Accelerometer-Based Sensors to Clinician-Annotated Video.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets