Dataset Information

Survival of Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Effect of Using Multiagent Versus Single-agent Chemotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Controversy exists regarding the optimal chemotherapy regimen for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Patients and methods

We analyzed data from the US National Cancer Data Base of 25,621 patients aged 60 to 79 years, with a diagnosis of AML from 2004 to 2014, who had received single-agent versus multiagent chemotherapy. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for overall survival (OS) analysis for the entire study cohort and separately for patients who had received single-agent (n = 6743) versus multiagent (n = 6743) chemotherapy, matched for age, Charlson comorbidity index, and AML subtype.

Results

The use of multiagent chemotherapy was high overall (70%) but declined with factors, such as increasing age, Charlson comorbidity index, AML subtype other than good risk, academic center, lower rate of high school graduation, and more recent year of diagnosis. Patients treated with multiagent chemotherapy had greater 1-year OS (43% vs. 28%), especially for patients aged 60 to 69 years and those with good-risk AML or Charlson comorbidity index of 0 to 1. OS (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.36) remained more favorable for the multiagent chemotherapy group on multivariable analysis. This was confirmed in a matched cohort analysis.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest real-world study that has demonstrated an association between factors such as age, comorbidity, and AML subtype and the use of multiagent chemotherapy. The use of multiagent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS, especially for patients aged <70 years, those with good-risk AML, and those with a low Charlson comorbidity index.

SUBMITTER: Bhatt VR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7190423 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose Bosutinib is a potent dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitor approved for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant and /or intolerant to prior therapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. Methods In this ongoing, multinational, phase III study, 536 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 400 mg of bosutinib once daily (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 268). Per protocol, efficacy was assessed in patients who were Philadelphia chromosome-positive with typical (e13a2/e14a2) transcripts (bosutinib, n = 246; imatinib, n = 241). Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative-/ BCR-ABL1-positive status and those with unknown Philadelphia chromosome status and/or atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript type were excluded from this population. Results The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months (primary end point) was significantly higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (47.2% v 36.9%, respectively; P = .02), as was complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate by 12 months (77.2% v 66.4%, respectively; P = .0075). Cumulative incidence was favorable with bosutinib (MMR: hazard ratio, 1.34; P = .0173; CCyR: hazard ratio, 1.38; P < .001), with earlier response times. Four patients (1.6%) receiving bosutinib and six patients (2.5%) receiving imatinib experienced disease progression to accelerated/blast phase. Among treated patients, 22.0% of patients receiving bosutinib and 26.8% of patients receiving imatinib discontinued treatment, most commonly for drug-related toxicity (12.7% and 8.7%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea (7.8% v 0.8%) and increased ALT (19.0% v 1.5%) and AST (9.7% v 1.9%) levels were more common with bosutinib. Cardiac and vascular toxicities were uncommon. Conclusion Patients who received bosutinib had significantly higher rates of MMR and CCyR and achieved responses faster than those who received imatinib. Consistent with the known safety profile, GI events and transaminase elevations were more common with bosutinib. Results indicate bosutinib may be an effective first-line treatment for chronic-phase CML.