Dataset on dynamics of Coronavirus on Twitter.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Aguilar-Gallegos N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7206447 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:In this data article, we provide a dataset of 8,982,694 Twitter posts around the coronavirus health global crisis. The data were collected through the Twitter REST API search. We used the rtweet R package to download raw data. The term searched was “Coronavirus” which included the word itself and its hashtag version. We collected the data over 23 days, from January 21 to February 12, 2020. The dataset is multilingual, prevailing English, Spanish, and Portuguese. We include a new variable created from other four variables; it is called “type” of tweets, which is useful for showing the diversity of tweets and the dynamics of users on Twitter. The dataset comprises seven databases which can be analysed separately. On the other hand, they can be crossed to set other researches, among them, trends and relevance of different topics, types of tweets, the embeddedness of users and their profiles, the retweets dynamics, hashtag analysis, as well as to perform social network analysis. This dataset can attract the attention of researchers related to different fields on knowledge, such as data science, social science, network science, health informatics, tourism, infodemiology, and others.
| S-EPMC7240211 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The use of social media data, like Twitter, for biomedical research has been gradually increasing over the years. With the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers have turned to more nontraditional sources of clinical data to characterize the disease in near real-time, study the societal implications of interventions, as well as the sequelae that recovered COVID-19 cases present (Long-COVID). However, manually curated social media datasets are difficult to come by due to the expensive costs of manual annotation and the efforts needed to identify the correct texts. When datasets are available, they are usually very small and their annotations do not generalize well over time or to larger sets of documents. As part of the 2021 Biomedical Linked Annotation Hackathon, we release our dataset of over 120 million automatically annotated tweets for biomedical research purposes. Incorporating best practices, we identify tweets with potentially high clinical relevance. We evaluated our work by comparing several SpaCy-based annotation frameworks against a manually annotated gold-standard dataset. Selecting the best method to use for automatic annotation, we then annotated 120 million tweets and released them publicly for future downstream usage within the biomedical domain.
| S-EPMC8328063 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The dataset described is an aspect-level sentiment analysis dataset for therapies, including medication, behavioral and other therapies, created by leveraging user-generated text from Twitter. The dataset was constructed by collecting Twitter posts using keywords associated with the therapies (often referred to as treatments). Subsequently, subsets of the collected posts were manually reviewed, and annotation guidelines were developed to categorize the posts as positive, negative, or neutral. The dataset contains a total of 5364 posts mentioning 32 therapies. These posts are further categorized manually into 998 (18.6%) positive, 619 (11.5%) negatives, and 3747 (69.9%) neutral sentiments. The inter-annotation agreement for the dataset was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa score, achieving an 0.82 score. The potential use of this dataset lies in the development of automatic systems that can detect users' sentiments toward therapies based on their posts. While there are other sentiment analysis datasets available, this is the first that encodes sentiments associated with specific therapies. Researchers and developers can utilize this dataset to train sentiment analysis models, natural language processing algorithms, or machine learning systems to accurately identify and analyze the sentiments expressed by consumers on social media platforms like Twitter.
| S-EPMC10558704 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this data article, a collection of 11,625,887 tweets on the topic of the COVID-19 pandemic are provided. The data from Twitter were collected through Twitter API from January 2020 to June 2020. In addition, we also provided subsets of tweets containing discourses on both COVID-19 and financial topics. In order to facilitate the research on sentiment analysis, the Sentiment140 dataset containing 1,600,000 tweets that were annotated as positive or negative sentiment was also provided (Go et al., 2009) We used Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) algorithm to transform documents to numeric vectors and used logistic regression classifier to train and predict sentiments of tweets. These datasets may garner interest from data science, economists, social science, natural language processing, epidemiology, and public health groups.
| S-EPMC9270199 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this data article, we provide a collection of 3,925,366 tweets and 18,413 online news around the online discussion about COVID-19 in Brazil. The data from Twitter were collected through Twitterscraper Python library and we considered a set of keywords in Portuguese regarding to COVID-19. In order to facilitate the identification of tweets that have hashtags, media and retweets for researchers or data enthusiasts, we created three specific datasets for each of these categories. The news on COVID-19 was collected from the UOL portal, the most popular Brazilian website. All the data were gathered from January to May, 2020. These datasets can attract the attention from communities such as data science, social science, natural language processing, tourism, infodemiology, and public health.
| S-EPMC7434436 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveSocial distancing policies are key in curtailing severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread, but their effectiveness is heavily contingent on public understanding and collective adherence. We studied public perception of social distancing through organic, large-scale discussion on Twitter.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.MethodsBetween March 27 and April 10, 2020, we retrieved English-only tweets matching two trending social distancing hashtags, #socialdistancing and #stayathome. We analyzed the tweets using natural language processing and machine-learning models, and we conducted a sentiment analysis to identify emotions and polarity. We evaluated the subjectivity of tweets and estimated the frequency of discussion of social distancing rules. We then identified clusters of discussion using topic modeling and associated sentiments.ResultsWe studied a sample of 574,903 tweets. For both hashtags, polarity was positive (mean, 0.148; SD, 0.290); only 15% of tweets had negative polarity. Tweets were more likely to be objective (median, 0.40; IQR, 0-0.6) with ~30% of tweets labeled as completely objective (labeled as 0 in range from 0 to 1). Approximately half of tweets (50.4%) primarily expressed joy and one-fifth expressed fear and surprise. Each correlated well with topic clusters identified by frequency including leisure and community support (ie, joy), concerns about food insecurity and quarantine effects (ie, fear), and unpredictability of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its implications (ie, surprise).ConclusionsConsidering the positive sentiment, preponderance of objective tweets, and topics supporting coping mechanisms, we concluded that Twitter users generally supported social distancing in the early stages of their implementation.
| S-EPMC7450231 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The current COVID-19 pandemic raises concerns worldwide, leading to serious health, economic, and social challenges. The rapid spread of the virus at a global scale highlights the need for a more harmonized, less privacy-concerning, easily accessible approach to monitoring the human mobility that has proven to be associated with viral transmission. In this study, we analyzed over 580 million tweets worldwide to see how global collaborative efforts in reducing human mobility are reflected from the user-generated information at the global, country, and U.S. state scale. Considering the multifaceted nature of mobility, we propose two types of distance: the single-day distance and the cross-day distance. To quantify the responsiveness in certain geographic regions, we further propose a mobility-based responsive index (MRI) that captures the overall degree of mobility changes within a time window. The results suggest that mobility patterns obtained from Twitter data are amenable to quantitatively reflect the mobility dynamics. Globally, the proposed two distances had greatly deviated from their baselines after March 11, 2020, when WHO declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. The considerably less periodicity after the declaration suggests that the protection measures have obviously affected people's travel routines. The country scale comparisons reveal the discrepancies in responsiveness, evidenced by the contrasting mobility patterns in different epidemic phases. We find that the triggers of mobility changes correspond well with the national announcements of mitigation measures, proving that Twitter-based mobility implies the effectiveness of those measures. In the U.S., the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on mobility is distinct. However, the impacts vary substantially among states.
| S-EPMC7654838 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Social media has been suggested as a source for safety information, supplementing existing safety surveillance data sources. This article summarises the activities undertaken, and the associated challenges, to create a benchmark reference dataset that can be used to evaluate the performance of automated methods and systems for adverse event recognition. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of public English-language Twitter posts (Tweets) was performed. We sampled 57,473 Tweets out of 5,645,336 Tweets created between 1 March, 2012 and 1 March, 2015 that mentioned at least one of six medicinal products of interest (insulin glargine, levetiracetam, methylphenidate, sorafenib, terbinafine, zolpidem). Products, adverse events, indications, product-event combinations, and product-indication combinations were extracted and coded by two independent teams of safety reviewers. RESULTS:The benchmark reference dataset consisted of 1056 positive controls ("adverse event Tweets") and 56,417 negative controls ("non-adverse event Tweets"). The 1056 adverse event Tweets contained 1396 product-event combinations referring to personal adverse event experiences, comprising 292 different MedDRA® Preferred Terms. The 1171 product-event combinations (83.9%) were confined to four MedDRA® System Organ Classes. The 195 Tweets (18.5%) contained indication information, comprising 25 different Preferred Terms. CONCLUSIONS:A manually curated benchmark reference dataset based on Twitter data has been created and is made available to the research community to evaluate the performance of automated methods and systems for adverse event recognition in unstructured free-text information.
| S-EPMC7165158 | biostudies-literature
Project description:People with lung cancer and others affected by the condition are using social media to share information and support, but little is known about how these behaviours vary between different platforms. To investigate this, we extracted posts from Twitter (using relevant hashtags), the Lung Cancer Support Group on Facebook and the Macmillan.org.uk lung cancer discussion forum for a single month. Interaction Process Analysis revealed that all three platforms were used more for giving than seeking information, opinion or suggestions. However, interaction types (including sentiment) varied between platforms, reflecting their digital architectures, user-base and inclusion of a moderator. For example, a higher percentage of information-seeking and sentiment marked the Macmillan.org.uk, compared with Twitter and the Facebook Group. Further analysis of the messages using a four-dimensional typology of social support revealed that emotional and informational support types were most prevalent on the Macmillan.org.uk forum, closely followed by the Facebook Group. Contrary to expectations, Twitter posts showed the most companionship support, reflecting the use of hashtags as user-generated signals of community belonging and interests. Qualitative analysis revealed an unanticipated sub-category of spiritual support, which featured uniquely in the Lung Cancer Support Group on Facebook. There was little evidence of trolling or stigma, although some users remarked that lung cancer was unfairly resourced compared with other cancers. These findings provide new insights about how people affected by lung cancer use social media and begin to elucidate the value of different platforms as channels for patient engagement and support, or as potential research data sources.
| S-EPMC6557847 | biostudies-other
Project description:Analysts of social media differ in their emphasis on the effects of message content versus social network structure. The balance of these factors may change substantially across time. When a major event occurs, initial independent reactions may give way to more social diffusion of interpretations of the event among different communities, including those committed to disinformation. Here, we explore these dynamics through a case study analysis of the Russian-language Twitter content emerging from Belarus before and after its presidential election of August 9, 2020. From these Russian-language tweets, we extracted a set of topics that characterize the social media data and construct networks to represent the sharing of these topics before and after the election. The case study in Belarus reveals how misinformation can be re-invigorated in discourse through the novelty of a major event. More generally, it suggests how audience networks can shift from influentials dispensing information before an event to a de-centralized sharing of information after it.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43545-022-00330-x.
| S-EPMC8990676 | biostudies-literature