Dataset Information

Visual seizure annotation and automated seizure detection using behind-the-ear electroencephalographic channels.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Seizure diaries kept by patients are unreliable. Automated electroencephalography (EEG)-based seizure detection systems are a useful support tool to objectively detect and register seizures during long-term video-EEG recording. However, this standard full scalp-EEG recording setup is of limited use outside the hospital, and a discreet, wearable device is needed for capturing seizures in the home setting. We are developing a wearable device that records EEG with behind-the-ear electrodes. In this study, we determined whether the recognition of ictal patterns using only behind-the-ear EEG channels is possible. Second, an automated seizure detection algorithm was developed using only those behind-the-ear EEG channels. METHODS:Fifty-four patients with a total of 182 seizures, mostly temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), and 5284 hours of data, were recorded with a standard video-EEG at University Hospital Leuven. In addition, extra behind-the-ear EEG channels were recorded. First, a neurologist was asked to annotate behind-the-ear EEG segments containing selected seizure and nonseizure fragments. Second, a data-driven algorithm was developed using only behind-the-ear EEG. This algorithm was trained using data from other patients (patient-independent model) or from the same patient (patient-specific model). RESULTS:The visual recognition study resulted in 65.7% sensitivity and 94.4% specificity. By using those seizure annotations, the automated algorithm obtained 64.1% sensitivity and 2.8 false-positive detections (FPs)/24 hours with the patient-independent model. The patient-specific model achieved 69.1% sensitivity and 0.49 FPs/24 hours. SIGNIFICANCE:Visual recognition of ictal EEG patterns using only behind-the-ear EEG is possible in a significant number of patients with TLE. A patient-specific seizure detection algorithm using only behind-the-ear EEG was able to detect more seizures automatically than what patients typically report, with 0.49 FPs/24 hours. We conclude that a large number of refractory TLE patients can benefit from using this device.

SUBMITTER: Vandecasteele K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7217054 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Visual seizure annotation and automated seizure detection using behind-the-ear electroencephalographic channels.

Vandecasteele Kaat K De Cooman Thomas T Dan Jonathan J Cleeren Evy E Van Huffel Sabine S Hunyadi Borbála B Van Paesschen Wim W

Epilepsia 20200311 4

<h4>Objective</h4>Seizure diaries kept by patients are unreliable. Automated electroencephalography (EEG)-based seizure detection systems are a useful support tool to objectively detect and register seizures during long-term video-EEG recording. However, this standard full scalp-EEG recording setup is of limited use outside the hospital, and a discreet, wearable device is needed for capturing seizures in the home setting. We are developing a wearable device that records EEG with behind-the-ear e ...[more]

PMID: 32160324

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSeizure detection is challenging outside the clinical environment due to the lack of comfortable, reliable, and practical long-term neurophysiological monitoring devices. We developed a novel, discreet, unobstructive in-ear sensing system that enables long-term electroencephalography (EEG) recording. This is the first study we are aware of that systematically compares the seizure detection utility of in-ear EEG with that of simultaneously recorded intracranial EEG. In addition, we present a similar comparison between simultaneously recorded in-ear EEG and scalp EEG.MethodsIn this foundational research, we conducted a clinical feasibility study and validated the ability of the ear-EEG system to capture focal-onset seizures against 1255 hrs of simultaneous ear-EEG data along with scalp or intracranial EEG in 20 patients with refractory focal epilepsy (11 with scalp EEG, 8 with intracranial EEG, and 1 with both).ResultsIn a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. The few seizures not detected on the ear-EEG signals emanated from deep within the mesial temporal lobe or extra-temporally and remained very focal, without significant propagation. Following multiple sessions of recording for a median continuous wear time of 13 hrs, patients reported a high degree of tolerance for the device, with only minor adverse events reported by the scalp EEG cohort.ConclusionsThese preliminary results demonstrate the potential of using ear-EEG to enable routine collection of complementary, prolonged, and remote neurophysiological evidence, which may permit real-time detection of paroxysmal events such as seizures and epileptiform discharges. This study suggests that the ear-EEG device may assist clinicians in making an epilepsy diagnosis, assessing treatment efficacy, and optimizing medication titration.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate and validate an offline, automated scalp EEG-based seizure detection system and to compare its performance to commercially available seizure detection software. METHODS:The test seizure detection system, IdentEvent™, was developed to enhance the efficiency of post-hoc long-term EEG review in epilepsy monitoring units. It translates multi-channel scalp EEG signals into multiple EEG descriptors and recognizes ictal EEG patterns. Detection criteria and thresholds were optimized in 47 long-term scalp EEG recordings selected for training (47 subjects, ?3653h with 141 seizures). The detection performance of IdentEvent was evaluated using a separate test dataset consisting of 436 EEG segments obtained from 55 subjects (?1200h with 146 seizures). Each of the test EEG segments was reviewed by three independent epileptologists and the presence or absence of seizures in each epoch was determined by majority rule. Seizure detection sensitivity and false detection rate were calculated for IdentEvent as well as for the comparable detection software (Persyst's Reveal®, version 2008.03.13, with three parameter settings). Bootstrap re-sampling was applied to establish the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates and for the performance comparison between two detection algorithms. RESULTS:The overall detection sensitivity of IdentEvent was 79.5% with a false detection rate (FDR) of 2 per 24h, whereas the comparison system had 80.8%, 76%, and 74% sensitivity using its three detection thresholds (perception score) with FDRs of 13, 8, and 6 per 24h, respectively. Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals of the performance difference revealed that the two detection systems had comparable detection sensitivity, but IdentEvent generated a significantly (p<0.05) smaller FDR. CONCLUSIONS:The study validates the performance of the IdentEvent™ seizure detection system. SIGNIFICANCE:With comparable detection sensitivity, an improved false detection rate makes the automated seizure detection software more useful in clinical practice.

Project description:Automated seizure detection is a valuable asset to health professionals, which makes adequate treatment possible in order to minimize brain damage. Most research focuses on two separate aspects of automated seizure detection: EEG feature computation and classification methods. Little research has been published regarding optimal training dataset composition for patient-independent seizure detection. This paper evaluates the performance of classifiers trained on different datasets in order to determine the optimal dataset for use in classifier training for automated, age-independent, seizure detection. Three datasets are used to train a support vector machine (SVM) classifier: (1) EEG from neonatal patients, (2) EEG from adult patients and (3) EEG from both neonates and adults. To correct for baseline EEG feature differences among patients feature, normalization is essential. Usually dedicated detection systems are developed for either neonatal or adult patients. Normalization might allow for the development of a single seizure detection system for patients irrespective of their age. Two classifier versions are trained on all three datasets: one with feature normalization and one without. This gives us six different classifiers to evaluate using both the neonatal and adults test sets. As a performance measure, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) is used. With application of FBC, it resulted in performance values of 0.90 and 0.93 for neonatal and adult seizure detection, respectively. For neonatal seizure detection, the classifier trained on EEG from adult patients performed significantly worse compared to both the classifier trained on EEG data from neonatal patients and the classier trained on both neonatal and adult EEG data. For adult seizure detection, optimal performance was achieved by either the classifier trained on adult EEG data or the classifier trained on both neonatal and adult EEG data. Our results show that age-independent seizure detection is possible by training one classifier on EEG data from both neonatal and adult patients. Furthermore, our results indicate that for accurate age-independent seizure detection, it is important that EEG data from each age category are used for classifier training. This is particularly important for neonatal seizure detection. Our results underline the under-appreciated importance of training dataset composition with respect to accurate age-independent seizure detection.

Dataset Information

Visual seizure annotation and automated seizure detection using behind-the-ear electroencephalographic channels.

Publications

Visual seizure annotation and automated seizure detection using behind-the-ear electroencephalographic channels.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets