Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br) showed acceptable reliability, validity and responsiveness in chronic low back pain.


ABSTRACT:

Background

This study aimed to adapt the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate its measurement properties, given as reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP).

Methods

A total of 108 patients with a mean age of 46.62?years (SD?=?9.98) and CLBP participated in this longitudinal study. Participants were oriented on undertaking the prescribed exercises in the first session, and adherence behavior was assessed after 1?week, and finally reassessed after 2?weeks (test-retest reliability). Three weeks after the first assessment, they were invited again to full fill the EARS (responsiveness). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and Cronbach's ? were used to assess test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively. Spearman's correlation and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to assess construct validity, and the Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze responsiveness.

Results

The one-factor EARS-Br (adherence behavior) structure with 6 items showed acceptable fit indexes (comparative fit index and goodness of fit index>?0.90 and root-mean-square error of approximationConclusionOur results demonstrated acceptable EARS-Br reliability, validity, and responsiveness for patients with CLBP. A final score of 17/24 on EARS after the prescription of home-exercise could be used as a cut-off for an acceptable adherence behavior associated with improvement in patient outcomes.

SUBMITTER: de Lira MR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7218635 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br) showed acceptable reliability, validity and responsiveness in chronic low back pain.

de Lira Mariana Romano MR   de Oliveira Anamaria Siriani AS   França Roberta Aniceto RA   Pereira Ana Claudia AC   Godfrey Emma L EL   Chaves Thais Cristina TC  

BMC musculoskeletal disorders 20200512 1


<h4>Background</h4>This study aimed to adapt the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) into Brazilian Portuguese and evaluate its measurement properties, given as reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP).<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 108 patients with a mean age of 46.62 years (SD = 9.98) and CLBP participated in this longitudinal study. Participants were oriented on undertaking the prescribed exercises in the first session, and adherence  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6804310 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3579716 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10833536 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7018811 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8277065 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7932035 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7866748 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4777438 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6738485 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8258813 | biostudies-literature