Unknown

Dataset Information

0

In vitro characterization of PrismaLung+: a novel ECCO2R device.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Invasive mechanical ventilation is lifesaving in the setting of severe acute respiratory failure but can cause ventilation-induced lung injury. Advances in extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) technologies may facilitate more protective lung ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome, and enable earlier weaning and/or avoid invasive mechanical ventilation entirely in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. We evaluated the in vitro CO2 removal capacity of the novel PrismaLung+ ECCO2R device compared with two existing gas exchangers. METHODS:The in vitro CO2 removal capacity of the PrismaLung+ (surface area 0.8?m2, Baxter) was compared with the PrismaLung (surface area 0.35?m2, Baxter) and A.L.ONE (surface area 1.35?m2, Eurosets) devices, using a closed-loop bovine blood-perfused extracorporeal circuit. The efficacy of each device was measured at varying pCO2 inlet (pinCO2) levels (45, 60, and 80?mmHg) and blood flow rates (QB) of 200-450?mL/min; the PrismaLung+ and A.L.ONE devices were also tested at a QB of 600?mL/min. The amount of CO2 removed by each device was assessed by measurement of the CO2 infused to maintain circuit equilibrium (CO2 infusion method) and compared with measured CO2 concentrations in the inlet and outlet of the CO2 removal device (blood gas analysis method). RESULTS:The PrismaLung+ device performed similarly to the A.L.ONE device, with both devices demonstrating CO2 removal rates ~ 50% greater than the PrismaLung device. CO2 removal rates were 73 ± 4.0, 44 ± 2.5, and 72 ± 1.9?mL/min, for PrismaLung+, PrismaLung, and A.L.ONE, respectively, at QB 300?mL/min and pinCO2 45?mmHg. A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated that the CO2 infusion method was comparable to the blood gas analysis method for calculating CO2 removal. The resistance to blood flow across the test device, as measured by pressure drop, varied as a function of blood flow rate, and was greatest for PrismaLung and lowest for the A.L.ONE device. CONCLUSIONS:The newly developed PrismaLung+ performed more effectively than PrismaLung, with performance of CO2 removal comparable to A.L.ONE at the flow rates tested, despite the smaller membrane surface area of PrismaLung+ versus A.L.ONE. Clinical testing of PrismaLung+ is warranted to further characterize its performance.

SUBMITTER: Hospach I 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7221037 | biostudies-literature | 2020 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

In vitro characterization of PrismaLung+: a novel ECCO<sub>2</sub>R device.

Hospach Ingeborg I   Goldstein Jacques J   Harenski Kai K   Laffey John G JG   Pouchoulin Dominique D   Raible Manuela M   Votteler Stefanie S   Storr Markus M  

Intensive care medicine experimental 20200513 1


<h4>Background</h4>Invasive mechanical ventilation is lifesaving in the setting of severe acute respiratory failure but can cause ventilation-induced lung injury. Advances in extracorporeal CO<sub>2</sub> removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) technologies may facilitate more protective lung ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome, and enable earlier weaning and/or avoid invasive mechanical ventilation entirely in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. We evaluated the in vitro CO<  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8306443 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6082559 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7047934 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9247164 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7075333 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5726654 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7822734 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7761483 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6089924 | biostudies-literature
2023-06-14 | GSE226086 | GEO